I'd recommend you reread your posts before clicking submit to avoid posting nonsensical replies...
Oooh, typo flame. Such heady intellectualism.
Let's see, which one make sense?
> I get the impression people accuse me of being a zealot quite frequently.
or
> I get the impression people accuse you of being a zealot quite frequently.
Rorschah test and you failed...
I'd also recommend that you look up the word zealot & reflect on why you are hearing it so often.
What is really interesting here is you. Snowden eh, you could have substituted anyone else who has done some interviews and everything I wrote would have been the same. But you, you are such an interesting specimen. What is it that motivates you to such levels of irrationality?
Are you mentally ill? I try not engage with the mentally ill so much because its just mean-spirited to poke at their reality-impairments. Would you even know it if you were mentally ill?
Or are you just one of those people who love hierarchy so much that they take anything that threatens the hierarchy to which they belong as a personal attack? An attack that provokes an emotional rather than a logical response? Sure you might try to use the forms of logic but when the ideas of your words don't actually follow in any logical manner it seems like just a veneer, an attempt to appropriate the language of a higher moral stage than what you are actually functioning at.
What is it that makes your clock tick so erratically and yet so emphatically?