And those who put "choice" above the life of the unborn baby
Fetus, not baby. Historically, the idea of confusing the two is a very, very recent development.
Only Christianity and Judaism maintain that God created a material reality that was (1) separate from Him, and (2) knowable.
LMAO. Trends come and go in all religions. The Islamic Golden Age was a time of amazing scientific and philosophical progress, but they gave it up. Catholics rejected science, then eventually came to embrace it. Protestants loved science, then modern evangelical sects came to despise it.
I was raised Southern Baptist, but wholly abandoned it because of their insane insistence that reality was wrong. When a man tells you the sky is green and Jesus rode a dinosaur, it's awfully hard not to laugh at his opinions on anything else. Whatever else I might think about their organization, the Catholic church seems to be pretty good about science these days. I don't hear anything bad about the scientific beliefs of mainstream protestant groups (that is, ones that aren't American extremists). That said, Hindu and Taoist countries are doing lots of amazing science, and the OECD says that lots of barely religious countries are beating the US in science education.
That's why "faith based" is still permitted.
Maybe that's the workaround: describe everything like "bases its recommendations on science, not that faith-based bullshit, in consideration with scientific community standards".
...has forbidden the Centers for Disease Control from using seven terms in certain documents...
Quick, give me a single context in which it makes sense for CDC to avoid the words "science-based" or "evidence-based".
Time's up. I know that wasn't long, but I thought I'd save you the wasted effort of spending more than 2 seconds looking for something that doesn't exist. If the CD-freaking-C writes "For science-based work" in the memo field of your paycheck, it's appropriate because that's the whole reason they exist.
Any restrictions on this are nothing but political posturing. That Slashdot, WaPo, NYT, or any other group would be calling it out doesn't mean they're wrong.
Here, let me help:
A workstation is a special computer designed for technical or scientific applications.
It's fun to call our Chromebooks a "workstation", but traditionally that's not remotely what it means.
A ton of Java [...]
...but called Scala. I don't see a lot of bare Java in the big data stores I'm around.
Aside from Go, try writing most of those products in the hipster-approved platforms like Python
...which had its first public release 26 years ago. Python can rent cars and it would buy a house if it wasn't a millennial. Its kid sister, Java, just turned 22.
But yeah, I see way more Python than (again, plain ol') Java in big data. JVM languages other than Java are pretty popular, and Spark/Hadoop are often coordinating efforts behind the scenes, but the software running on the cluster is probably going to be Python/NumPy/SciPy/scikit-learn or Scala.
Admittedly, the datasets I work on aren't bigger than a small number of petabytes, so maybe we're not big data by some standards.
"Little else matters than to write good code." -- Karl Lehenbauer