But no, Republicans had to fight Obama instead of actually helping America by doing the thing they thought was a good idea in the first place, because... Obama or something.
"because... Obama or something, like he's black"
Fixed that for you. All those white working-class joes realized Dems weren't just talking the talk when they said they supported black equality.
"Chime is a financial technology company, not a bank." So they skirted bank law by being a technology company instead.
If they are not a bank, then how is it that they are receiving and holding deposits, unless they actually are a bank or have opened an account in your name at another bank? You need an ABA Routing number for that,
and Only banks can get those....
Paypal is not a bank and they hold people's cash and refuse to give it back at times.
Exactly this. I'm surprised at all the tech pros who make at least $40/hr complaining about $3/month in cost for software that gets supported across multiple platforms that they don't have to support themselves. Even with KeePass, you have to set up the infrastructure and go digging for ports for each device. And you somehow trust every one of these independent developers. If you really need the added security or it's a hobby, fine. But for folks with stuff to do, fighting this battle seems unnecessary.
Here's an article that argues that you can still plead the fifth because there are so many possible crimes that one can be indicated for that the bar is high to compel testimony. Also, there are lots of state-level crimes that a Presidential pardon does not absolve you of, so you can still plead the fifth to avoid those crimes.
The key insight I got from the article is the last sentence here:
"The Fifth Amendment is simply too important to a democratic way of life to be waved away so easily, Zelin said. It exists, he said, to protect people from the government forcing testimony, whether those people are guilty or innocent. To invoke it, you don't even need to point to an existing case or investigation."
Google "blanket pardon"
People have different tolerances for risk.
Do you ever eat at a restaurant? I'd say you're more likely to get spit on your restaurant burger than your groceries contaminated.
Why does it need to run SSH anyhow?
I think mostly so you can script for automated deployments
https://www.bmj.com/content/37... seems to be the study. Is hard to draw firm conclusions, especially because so many of the HIIT group dropped out before the study ended.
Just to add on, people who got too sick/weak so they dropped out of the HIIT group but did not die probably affected the results. It seems like a generally poor study.
And GOP has not realized that the majority of ppl their party are older.
Oh they realize it, but clearly they don't care. And neither do the older ppl in their party. I will grant them that choosing to take risks an living with the consequences should generally be allowed. But when your risky choices cost the rest of us, then it's our right to reign you in. Want to drive with no seatbelt? No problem, if you agree to live with the consequences. But when you get in an accident and the government has to pay $500k for your hospital care because you refused to buy insurance because "freedom" then support you for the rest of your life because you're a vegetable, that effects us and we have the right to say fuck you, wear a seatbelt. Agree to a do-not-resuscitate bracelet and I'm all for you sticking your head out the window driving down the freeway.
Why can't they? Because Trump's HHS took away that responsibility from them in July of this year. [cnbc.com] What you're seeing is the last data that the CDC had before Trump's HHS cut off the flow.
I agree that managing this information is in the CDC's bailiwick. Maybe you should tell that to the White House.
Mark parent as insightful. Trump moved reporting to HHS so he could control the data and filter and spin it his way. Just like any good authoritarian. Oh, I forgot, let's keep this about science and not politics.
It's hard to get buy-in to even plan for overflow if your leaders don't believe there's a problem. This is a difference between the US and UK responses
It's a false equivalence. Racist vs Socialist are not equally bad.
You hate me because of my race. I hate you because you hate me and my race. These attitudes are not equally bad.
It's not censorship if it's not done by the goverment
That's all fine and good, but that doesn't mean she wants to protect Indians over Americans. It means she serves the corporate class over the worker class.
I'll grant you that it's hard to disentangle motivations, but I'd suggest that she'd be less motivated if 70% of H1-Bs came from Iraq. Or even Taiwan. But who knows
One possible reason that things aren't going according to plan is that there never was a plan in the first place.
