and why not have the courts force the data purchasers to purge the data and get a their money back from the carriers?

I know it is basically impossible to delete it all but if it shouldn't have been sold to them then they shouldn't be permitted to still have or use it.

Yes. My wife likes it but I found it much like the Amazon's Fire devices.where they were heavily biased toward their own services which is totally understandable but not what I want.

Roku *was* nice because it didn't have a clear bias. I did try an Nvidia shield last year but found it meh.

If you are just need/want Plex then a AppleTV seems like overkill.

This crap will push some folks to just run their own Plex server and a HTPC.

And why got this modded flaimbait, lolz.

I guess I have to invoke my mail to the admin power again and get some people get their mod rights removed.

There are.
Negev, death valley, Center of Sahara or Gobi, Atacama.

Just because at the edges is some life, does not mean in the middle is.
And: if you have a 100 million square miles desert: you certainly do not need an environmental study if you want to cover one promille of it with solar panels. Facepalm!

It is not really plausible that Switzerland only has a load of 30GW anyway.
https://www.bfe.admin.ch/bfe/e...

Apple TV is heavily slanted towards paid content.

If the profit or stock price are affected then "never let a crisis go to waste" tactics kick in.

I am a long term Roku fan and have multiple devices. This kind of garbage is how you get me to leave and never come back.

I'm saying fines by themselves don't work. Corporations don't make decisions or take actions, people do. Hold people accountable and we might see some change for the better.

Ultimately the customers will pay the fine. The carriers get hit with the bill and the stock price drops. In order to make up for the 'loss', the carriers are going to increase prices.

You didn't think the executives were going to eat the bill did you?

Certainly.
I could not do either.
But I think they invented Yoghurt already.
Not sure, though.

Sorry, that is just nonsense ...
Switzerland is like it ever was.

The questions about having money in Switzerland are bilateral agreements.

E.g. Germany wants to tax interests yielded i foreign countries. So Switzerland agreed to sent information about that to Germany. Otherwise the banks are just the same as before.

She should take advantage of this bug to get child fares, assuming they are cheaper than senior fare rates.
That would be funny and would make news, haha.

The WHO never "put the word out" that COVID is not air borne.
At the beginning of COVID they had a statement like: "so far there is no evidence that COVID is airborne"

That is a fucking big difference, stupid idiot.

And the rest of your rant: "airborne" is not a scientific term. So obviously they use "infectious respiratory particles" that "spread through the air".

How damn stupid can one be?

What happened to the Swizz banks a few years ago?