Although a planet, by definition of the *word*, is every body orbiting a star!
By that definition, even your momma is a planet.
Come to think about it, she too is by some other definitions, but that's beside the point.
WTF is cislunar orbit and how does it differ from any other lunar orbit?
Yeah.. We only have to dig 3000 km to arrive at liquid rock. That's like 0.0001% of Earth's ~6000 km radius. Right?
Activists from the feminist and LGBTQIA+ communities have been trying to force the Linux project to join the Contributor Covenant [...] an agreement to implement a special Code of Conduct (frequently CoC from now on) aimed at changing the predominantly white, straight, and male face of programming. CC’s Code of Conduct is controversial particularly because it allows anyone to be banned from contributing code for any reason, usually with no mechanism for oversight or accountability.
On September 16 the pro-CoC side got their wish—Linux had officially committed to implementing and obeying the CC Code of Conduct—and they immediately set about using it to remove top Linux coders. Sage Sharp, who describes theyself as a “diversity & inclusion consultant, hufflepuff, non-binary agender trans masculine” and has 7k followers, cites GeekFeminismWiki and targets Google’s Theo Ts’o with accusations of being a rape apologist.
Opposition to CC’s Code of Conduct has generated thousands of posts on 4chan’s technology board alone.
This has prompted a growing discussion of rescinding GPL license grants from code contributions, in protest.
Specifically, in apparent retaliation, members of the Linux kernel developer community (by way of the Linux Kernel Mailing List) are now considering en masse rescinding of their grants of GPL licenses for their code contributions, in protest. Developers who have been banned as a result of the CoC are being encouraged to do the same.
This recent development may have been stimulated in part by founder Linus Torvalds' recent announcement that he will be stepping away from Linux kernel development, at least for the near term. Apparently, Linus was under increasing pressure from the CoC activists for his infamous impatience with—and boorish verbal abuse towards—submitters of code that does not meet his exacting standards for inclusion in the kernel.
In response, perennial Linux critic and agitator Richard Stallman (RMS) has stated he intends to decline comment on this internal Linux community controversy.
In German it text translated to a "Array of building openings" or a "forest of Doors".
What a load of nonsense. Your sig is oddly appropriate.
If you disconnect the counter output (leaving it in place) the pattern changes
Is this actually true?
Here is the diagnostics list for the telemetry with an explanation of what the fields are, also it is anonymized.
You mean there's what Microsoft says it is or does. Since the data transmitted encrypted, all those claims are unverifiable. I know it, you know it, Microsoft knows it. Give the past, I'd feel stupid trusting in that Microsoft accurately describes what they are doing there. Wonder what makes you so certain?
You realise that one line of text in the start menu you can just turn off right?
Pretty sure it's more than "one line of text", and the fact that you can go out of your way to turn it off until the next upgrade is worthless.
but does it run IN FAST KERNEL mode?
Right. Personal data and usage habits are completely worthless to a company like Microsoft that has absolutely no incentive to, say, push ads out to users.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to buy this new product that I just saw in my start menu.
So you both do and do not want a bezel-less tablet?
This is an EU thing, not a GB thing. Greenwich won't be affected.
6.674184×10^-11 and 6.674484×10^-11
This kind of cryptic number stuff isn't suitable for a mainstream news site like this.
You can't be serious.
Throughput is performance
No, throughput is a specific aspect of performance
Yes, dimwit, throughput is the specific aspect of performance that we're talking about. It's not wrong to say we're talking about performance when throughput is an aspect of it.
I can't believe you're maliciously nitpicking in this way while also saying
But from your use of discussion-sabotage techniques I see you do not want to actually discuss facts. That is fine, just do not expect to be taken seriously.
I recommend you take a piece of your own advice and fuck off.
Congratulations! You are the one-millionth user to log into our system. If there's anything special we can do for you, anything at all, don't hesitate to ask!
