Bullshit!

President Trump doesn't need a pandemic, he's up against Biden. A rock in the street would present a more formidable adversary.
Maybe you need to get your head out of your ass, take a weekend off campus (or out of whatever silly liberal bubble you live in) and realize reality doesn't give a shit about or agree with what you think.

Here's an idea: You're responsible for yourself! The Government is not your mommy or your daddy. If you want to be healthy, eat better foods and exercise. If you want money get a job and EARN IT. Grow the fuck up and take responsibility for yourself.

Would you care to contrast that with the Democratic platform's clearly expressed intention to provide free education and medical care to illegal aliens as opposed to the citizens paying the tax money in the first place?

You mean a real court where both sides are represented and the public is allowed to see what's going on?
Or something like the FISA court were the very existence of the court is hidden from the people and while the Gov't DOES ask for warrants, they're only rejected 0.03% of the time?
One of those two is a perversion of our court system is supposed to operate.

Sheltering children from the world is a losing battle. The world is far more ubiquitous and persistent than the most overprotective helicopter parent. Instead of keeping them ignorant teach them well and (here's the hard part) trust them to make good decisions.
If your 8 year old is asking questions, answer them honestly. That answer may well include the phrase "You're not old enough I'll be happy to explain when you are, meantime stay away from that.". If you've been honest and informative to that point they'll probably accept that as an answer.

Maybe you're not very good at reading or understanding differing points of view is not one of your strengths. I'll try to make it simpler for you:
If someone has not committed a crime, they should not be arrested for that crime.
If someone is committing a crime just by planning a different crime, they have committed a crime and should be prosecuted for the planning, not the crime they did not commit.
I answered your question quite clearly. If you failed to understand my answer that's not my fault or my problem.
"Or are you just a racist or bigot of some sort..."Oh you're a liberal! I probably triggered you when I suggested you're responsible for yourself. My apologies. If you want to reply with additional insults, here's a short list you've missed: Mom's basement, small penis, Nazi (though you kinda touched on that), transphobe, homophobe, white.
Have a great day!

Repeat after me: arresting innocent people is a BAD thing.
Innocent people are those who have not committed a crime. Maybe planning to commit a crime is a crime in itself, and if so that would be reasonable for prosecution. The policy of arresting people for a crime they haven't committed has serious problems.
You should probably reconsider that statement a bit, then maybe think about what you can do to take care of yourself. You are responsible for your own safety, not the police.

Actually, it just signals that he's probably not a leftist.
OTOH, why would you assume the poster is ignorant or insincere based on the use of a single word in a post?
Did what he said trigger you enough to post but not enough for you to even try to refute his statement?

"Seems like xxx only like robust opinions they agree with." FTFY
There's a lot of that going around. What's that thing about living in a glass house and throwing rocks again?

It's almost like making fun of people with medical conditions is disapproved of by some people.
Don't they understand that sort of thing is fine if the sick people hold an ideology you (or liberals in general) don't approve of?
Such simpletons.

Speaking from the standpoint of an American here, you mean if you give someone a firearm (and training to use it to shoot people) and body armor and restraints and a Taser and a radio where he can call for immediate backup and make him nearly immune to the consequences of his actions from a legal standpoint, sometimes that can go to a person's head? Lol, that could never happen!

While there are many shades of grey, some things are less so. Let's say you see a movement that dresses in black including their faces so they can't be identified, congregates in mobs, beats people who disagree with them, destroys public and private property and strongly suppresses speech they don't agree with. Good or bad?
If you think Thomas Jefferson was talking about biology when he made the quote in your sig, you're seriously off track. I rather suspect your misunderstanding is intentional.

"95% of your movies and TV shows are filled with violence, murders and death." And explosions. Given the choice of watching a helicopter explode in the side of a building just after the protagonist jumps out of it reaching for the... See? Much more gripping and entertaining than watching puppies play or a couple explore facets of their fictitious relationship. But if it makes you feel superior to look down on what other people like, stick with your rom-com's. It takes all sorts.

"You know what I do when I see an article or video I disagree with? I go on with my life and forget about it."
Hell yeah! If it disagrees with your strongly held beliefs, ignore the reality that's plain to see and carry on with your life as though you'd never seen it in the first place.
If it really pisses you off feel free to cast aspersions on the author's dick size, living arrangements (Mom's basement) and maybe call them a white male ('cause that's an insult apparently). Just so long as it's a personal attack against a complete stranger that doesn't address the issues raised, you're now good to ignorantly move on with your life.
You do you!

The word you're looking for is the modern "progressive" or "liberal".

You should probably take another look at "gun crime". Consider first removing suicides and accidents from that number.
Or skip it 'cause you know better, facts be damned, right?