Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment CO2 abstinence only? (Score 5, Insightful) 456

"Geoengineering: could lessen the effects of climate change or undermine the political will to fight it."

Isn't this a bit like the whole "teaching condoms in school is dangerous because then teens will have massive amounts of sex"? You're omitting a valid (even if imperfect) solution that may help stave off tragedy if people choose a particular path in order to defend and mandate that your "morally superior path" is the only option presented.

Comment Re:Misleading title (Score 2) 130

Better let NASA know that they haven't sent up balloons. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echo_satellite

For balloons ascending to space *as* balloons, you don't need orbital velocity, just get high enough. None have broken 53km. Since the height varies between agencies (usually 100km, with some using 50 miles, which is about 80km), different people have been recognized as astronauts (USAF vs. NASA). Repeat in different countries. Looking up this balloon, it got to 30km, which is well below either definition.

So, yes... balloons have been sent to space (with other means of propulsion). No, this one did not. It failed to get halfway to the most generous limit, and less than a third of the most commonly accepted threshold.

Comment Re:IP-level blocks (Score 4, Funny) 449

If meddling with DNS doesn't work, network operators will simply be forced to block at the IP level, e.g. by withdrawing the BGP routes to the censored sites. Good luck circumventing this kind of blocking (still possible with proxies, and maybe distributed anonymous p2p proxies, but a nuisance anyway).

Wait. Did you just state that there was a way to reliably block sites, sarcastically wish people luck, and then parenthetically note how to defeat your invented scenario?

In that case: They could isolate all servers with blocks of hardened, compressed layers of dried pasta. Good luck circumventing this kind of blocking (still possible with trained mice who can pull ethernet cables through their tunnels, and maybe wifi on frequencies not blocked by pasta, but a nuisance anyway).

Kind of fun. Now somebody else go!

Comment Re:Another iPhone (Score 1) 364

So you're basing your buying consideration on a bad example that occurred close to 20 years ago? Insanity.

You do understand that it's an illustration of a point? I am typing this (and the other comment) on a Macbook Pro. My wife is downstairs using my iPad to look at the holiday recipes she's cooking. It's a bad idea to base your buying decisions on one bad experience... which what the parent post had said.

Comment Re:Another iPhone (Score 1) 364

Though you are buying one phone, you are choosing from a sea of phones and carriers. A lot of how the choice works out comes down to luck.

That is somewhat true, but it's also true for cars and laptops for many people. It's "whatever Best Buy has", or whichever car lot they happen to visit and what they are trying to move. An informed consumer can choose a phone carefully, weighing their choices. That does not mean, of course, that you'll get everything you want: the original point was a single feature: OS upgrades. That can be found. As to if anybody offers the exact feature set you want... well, that's not always available. But nor is it available for vehicles or laptops either.

Personally, my killer feature is a physical qwerty keyboard. My wife also really likes them (so she can ssh into her computing cluster). That limits our options greatly, the same as if we needed four wheel drive. That said, there are few things better documented these days than cars, phones and laptops, so you cn easily do the research to find what you want.

Comment Re:About Time! (Score 1) 493

Possibly that figured in due to the politics of the time. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., however, was a pretty clear trigger. They were 4 years apart, and the temperance movement had been going for a fair amount of time by the time it passed, so it's certainly reasonable.

Comment Re:About Time! (Score 1) 493

When was it found unconstitutional?

Really, a half minute of looking it up would have found you the answer. I guarantee that you spent more time copying and pasting your quotes. Heck, the answer's even in the opening paragraphs of the Wikipedia article about the 16th amendment: It was found unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. Thus the need for an amendment to the constitution to make it... well... constitutional again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollock_v._Farmers'_Loan_%26_Trust_Co.

Comment Re:Another iPhone (Score 1, Insightful) 364

I don't know... the lousy Apple III bug with the chips popping out is why I don't buy Apple stuff like the iPhone. I mean, I always judge a buying decision on the worst example within a large class of products, just like you.

Psst... Android isn't a phone, it's an OS available on many products from many companies. Plenty of Android phones are regularly updated and have good hardware. This is about the market of all Android phones, and as you tend to buy *one* phone, rather than the entire market, it doesn't actually apply to any specific individual, but rather the marketplace as a whole.

Comment Re:Huh? (Score 1) 383

Since when did cosmetics, and most especially the advertisements thereof, have anything to do with reality? They are like real life photoshop.

Yes. Exactly. A company can't use a video of Photoshop to advertise their crummy paint program for the iPad. It's a different product that you're showing. The makeup is intended to enhance your appearance, and you're using a different product to enhance that appearance.

Slashdot Top Deals

egrep -n '^[a-z].*\(' $ | sort -t':' +2.0

Working...