Why limit the purpose of the site to drugs? Can we stick in molecules found in foods?
Probably because (unless you are willing to accept high-school-chem levels of oversimplification, and probably even if you are) computational chemistry is not exactly a problem that has any difficulty consuming all the computational resources we could possibly throw at it (unless you count problems with scaling, which I suspect that it has in spades, just to make computing with cheap interconnect less practical).
Drugs have the virtue of being (relatively) simple compared to most naturally occurring materials and (ideally) are fairly narrowly targeted. Both are significant virtues if you want to keep the scope of your simulation within the scope of the remotely possible...
Microsoft blew its right foot off with Windows 8. They went to the doctor to get it reattached with Windows 8.1 only to wake up to find out that a second left foot was attached in place.
Unfortunately, Win7's dual-left-foot support was actually pretty good; but was removed because you can't operate the imaginary ipad-killing tablet that Balmer dreams about with two left feet...
That's the weird thing about Win8: Vista, while a failure, at least had the decency to founder largely because everything kept from XP was antique and everything scrapped and rebuilt was immature. Win8 started out as a product that people (at least the Windows-using ones) mostly liked, and then was systematically mutilated until the release date. That takes talent.
How fast can you explain to the guy about to cut off your hand that it's not going to work? Is he going to believe you?
Wrong strategy: Simply explain that you'd be happy to assist a fine fellow such as him with making the desired modifications to your laptop's security settings...
Seriously, if somebody is willing to chop your hand off to bypass the security system (even if they are on the wrong track technologically) probably has many ways of demonstrating the sort of attacks enabled by physical access. You'll need to have something good on that computer to make even trying to hold out worth it.
Seeing as how it would be pretty easy to install an RFID reader on a PC, I'm going to guess that someone already patented it, wants too much money for it, and it won't expire for another ten years or so.
I think that the problem is mostly apathy. 'Enterprise' laptops offered smartcard support for years(as did/does windows) and you could get fairly cheap PCMCIA slot card readers(the just-slightly-larger size of the PCMCIA slot makes the physical design pretty easy, and implementing a low-voltage, low-speed serial bus isn't rocket surgery). Once 'contactless/RFID' became a Thing, laptops in the same bracket started to offer RFID as an option. It's mostly mired in cryptic alphabet soup (nothing reminds you exactly how many, mostly shitting and overlapping, some incompatible RFID 'standards' there are like trying to use something not purchased all in a lump and at a markup from a single vendor); but it's there. This document applies to select Dells; but others should be largely similar.
Broadcom's "BCM2079x Family" shows up at the party, usually with some amount of confusing vendor rebranding, fairly frequently.
Coming soon to a laptop near you: Newton recognition (fig model for initial release, apricot and whole grain planned with kickstarter funding, if whoever (now) holds the rights to Commodore's IP releases the rights to "kickstart" in time.)
While certain diplomatic and economic relations are under strain and protests go on all over, it's important to note that none of the surveillance and other civil rights and outright illegal activity has slowed or stopped at all. In some ways it seems to have increased.
Demanding that these activities cease is action #1.
You mean, your palms. No reason they can't take an interest in the *rest* of your hands.
You'll feel better if you get some tail.
What the gods would destroy they first submit to an IEEE standards committee.