What? Really? Someone needs to go back and learn some basic E/M theory. Inducing a signal on both lines would result in a net zero for the load, because both sides of the load would be driven equally..
Um, that is what I said happens to a balanced connection.
Unlike an unbalanced connection where one wire is shared.
Speaker wires are a completely different beast, with enormously more power.
Balanced output especially for portable headphones has a rather large effect on sound quality, perhaps most of all because the thin wires of portable headphones are susceptible to noise, and with a balanced output, any EM noise hitting both wires cancel exactly out. And it allows for higher voltage differential, which further raises the noise ceiling.
if the power circuit is internally reduced to -40 (ie has soaked ambient heat overnight) it's hard to expect much of the chemistry, if it's urgent I guess jam it in your pants or armpit.
One problem with many capacitive touch displays is that they stop working if your hands are cold and dry.
Why not just an XLR connector while you're at it?
Size. A 2.5mm balanced socket is smaller than a 3.5mm mini headphone one, while offering better sound quality.
Hydrogen storage, as compared to battery storage, is about 60% more efficient by volume
I was comparing hydrogen to ICE, not to batteries. Hydrogen surely beats batteries in many ways, but I don't see it having many operational advantages over petrol/diesel.
My list is slightly different from yours:
- Being able to make calls, whether in tropical heat or it's -40.
- Being able to charge it through standard micro-USB or USB-C.
- A size that allows one-handed operation.
I would prefer a 2.5 mm balanced port.
Agreed - however, the leaning of the passenger is also a big component of the stability of most two-wheel vehicles. Not having that, most autonomous two-wheel vehicles need to add a gyroscopic balancing system.
As kids, we had fun pushing our bicycles off a small hilltop and watched how they stayed upright - the one that got the farthest would "win". Most made it all the way, and my best friend had a bike that hardly ever fell over until it was at a standstill. Looking at it with hindsight, I suspect that his bike had a sharp enough front angle and heavy enough frame that it would auto-adjust better.
Your reading comprehension is terrible, because I never made a claim about all cyclists, just some of them. Learn about qualifiers.
Given that I don't have a cell phone, I'm not sure what laws I'm ignoring...
Gyroscope.
This is what most people think is the reason why bikes tend to stay stable. It's also mostly wrong.
Sure, if running really fast with heavy wheeled motorbikes, the gyrostabilization effect is noticeable. But it's negligible for light bikes at lower speeds or smaller wheels.
The main reason is how the front frame is angled. As long as a bike is going forward, a dip to the side combined with the rider's weight will angle the steering towards the middle, which helps right the bike.
This is something to look for when buying the first bike for a toddler. The more angled back the steering column is, the more stable it will be. A chopper is far more stable than a pennyfarthing.
I think they would be less of a menace. A riderless bike would presumably obey traffic laws and regulations, unlike a great many human bike riders who don't give a shit.
We put more people in jail because of the war on drugs.
Only around 1 of 5 of the US prison population has drug charges as the only or main reason. Both property crime and violent crime have far more incarcerations.
https://static.prisonpolicy.or...
The ratio of incarcerations to the general population is sky high in the US compared to other countries even if every single one of the drug convicts were released.
There are many factors why the US has such a high number of inmates, including a for-profit prison system, elected judges (nobody will get elected on a promise to be more lenient than hard), but probably most of all inequality.
There's a difference between convicted and elected.
"Why can't we ever attempt to solve a problem in this country without having a 'War' on it?" -- Rich Thomson, talk.politics.misc
