Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Profile of attacker already available.. (Score 1) 461

Also... what exactly does skin contact with ricin do?
According to this, nothing:

The greatest danger from ricin is inhalation. The LD50 (50% chance of a dose being lethal) for ricin inhalation is 22 micrograms per kg. For an 80kg man this would be just 1.76 milligrams. Accidentally cough while opening the letter and its all over. Just pulling the letter out of the envelope would create enough airborne particles to be dangerous.

What I don't understand is this: Does someone think that the President of the United States actually opens his own mail?

Comment Re:Just plain wrong (Score 1) 294

Maybe, maybe not. It might be he's trying to focus the spotlight on how outdated copyright law is in the digital era, and he may be trying to force change. Because he has a point. What's stopping you from duplicating a non-DRM MP3 and then reselling as many copies as you wish via this service?

The service actually tries to address this. Before you can offer a song for sale you have to "quarantine" it to the application on your computer. The service checks to make sure you have not already sold the song before making it available for purchase. How that is accomplished I do not know. Once the song sells, your quarantined copy is deleted. You could have another copy offline somewhere but I think the software will detect it if you try to sell that same copy again. The service really did try to do more than just remind you that you are supposed to delete your copy now.

Comment Just plain wrong (Score 1) 294

"Courts have consistently held that the unauthorized duplication of digital music files over the Internet infringes a copyright owner's exclusive right to reproduce," Judge Sullivan wrote. "However, courts have not previously addressed whether the unauthorized transfer of a digital music file over the Internet -- where only one file exists before and after the transfer -- constitutes reproduction within the meaning of the Copyright Act. The court holds that it does."

Someone needs to audit the bank records for this judge. From his statement it is clear that the judge understands, at least to some extent, the implications of the decision that he is making. That he would issue a summary judgement on such an issue is bordering on misconduct.

Comment Or Maybe Not (Score 1) 583

An article on arstechnica provides some claims to the contrary.
From the article:

Bitcoin watchers and financial experts aren't as convinced. While the two events may be happening simultaneously, there is little, if any, hard evidence to suggest that one event is fueling the other.

Maybe someone needs a refresher in "correlation does not imply causation"?

Slashdot Top Deals

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...