Cynical? This isn't my first rodeo. I watched them kill off OS/2, pretty much exactly the same way.
Seems he learned his lesson at least, and actually removed the content. You know what would be funny? If the FBI asked him to keep the files to help with an on-going investigation.
A couple years back I had a scrotal abscess. The doctor had to inject the local into my nutsack so he could drain the thing. That was in the running for the second worst pain I have ever experienced. But later on when he was scooping me out like a fucking cantaloupe, he apologized for causing me so much discomfort, and my reply was "I've had worse." Had to have an open wound and a... "crotch wick'... for 8 weeks after that.
So what's to stop some company from taking your code and making changes to it SHOULD be their lawyers, who should realize that without an explicit license available using those files would be a huge legal liability. Or your lawyers, later on, when you're proving the point.
Anyway, this same argument is the one typically applied to the BSD license, and the answer is, presumably, the developer doesn't give a shit about that. Certainly Microsoft, AT&T and SCO all made bank off coded licensed under that license, and I didn't hear any of the guys who wrote the original code complaining.
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.