You don't seem to be aware of the massive benefits to business (and therefor the government via taxes) from being in the EU. It's not just a matter of working out if payments to the EU are greater than payments from the EU. And that doesn't even factor in the number of EU workers propping up vital institutions like the NHS, or the EU immigrants who are paying more taxes than they get from the government, etc. etc. etc.

You're proving their point - people who don't understand the EU being angry about the EU.

And you are incapable of forming an argument. Now what?

And in the mean-time just accept the unnecessary deaths?

If free speech is important, you are admitting it has power. If something has power the thought of constraining it isn't so bizarre, is it? Society has realised that everythign which can be dangerous to society needs to be limited in some fashion.

That this is moderated as "Troll" speaks volumes about slashdot. Oh my how the times have changed.

Read the other charges... You're embarrassing yourself somewhat.

There is a stark difference between performing opposition research by using a domestic company and by using a foreign government.

And if you never lie to the FBI, they'll never charge you with lying to them. Weird, huh?

You are entirely incorrect. Well done.

Nationalised healthcare is cheaper than the US's current system. The US currently spends more per capita on healthcare than any country with nationalised healthcare, without all the benefits. If a person can go to college and get a job which will pay more taxes over their working life than if they did go to college, and if that increase in taxes is more than the cost of tuition, it will pay for itself.

It's not expensive. It's just cutting out lots of companies represented by powerful lobbyists, hence the reluctance of government to do anything about it.

Don't confuse having a wall with controlling borders. The former has vanishingly little to do with the latter.

It's a lot easier to keep equipment like this working when it's not moving around on sand, travel times are reduced massively, and they have lots of access to fresh, cold water.

There are plenty of online shops in the EU. Due to regulation they haven't all been gobbled up and become one massive shop.

The law in question isn't weird. You can push your Amazon button and get a substitute product. One you didn't explicitly agree to order. You weren't informed about what this replacement is, and can't compare prices as it's a mystery product. How is that weird?

The usual definition - someone seeking to coerce people into political change through the use or threat of violence. Criminals aren't terrorists by default, even if they're really scary to you.

You are showing your ignorance again - every scientist's conclusions are suspect by default, as that's part of the scientific method, and why peer review exists and is used. That lets us weed out compromised research from honest research, and gives you all the technology and medicine your life depends on.

The problem is politicians crippling the government because their pet projects don't get funding, not that the government spends money on scientific research.

They're not criminals until a judge says they are. Vigilantism isn't helping anyone.