Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I don't understand the "high cap" magazine ban (Score 1) 1862

Jared Loughner was not reloading. He was attempting to clear a stove pipe jam, which is technically a weapons malfunction, when he was tackled, probably caused by the fact he was using a 30 round magazine in the glock as they are known to cause jams.

It was the same thing in the North Hollywood shoot out. The cops were able to approach after one of the shooters' AK suffered a stove pipe and the shooter didn't apparently know how to clear it.

Comment Re:I don't understand the "high cap" magazine ban (Score 1) 1862

The perception that the "AK" is somehow inaccurate is due to the versions used in all the 3rd world conflicts being fully automatic and used by personel with little training. There is a lot of spray and pray. Anyone that's been on the recieving end knows that the AK in the hands of someone with at least some training, the AK is certainly accurate enough.

Comment Re:Oops, they forgot something (Score 1) 1862

We saw those signs in Missouri just after CCW was passed. Here a couple years later they are all but gone. A few businesses have them around, but not many and those that do I don't go to. After we passed it in Missouri the Post-Dispatch had a headline crying the streets would run red with blood from cititzens having wild west shoot outs at every precieved insult. A year later they ran an article saying "Well the crime rate didn't go down much, but we might have been wrong about the wild west shoot outs".

Guns in the hands of law abiding citizens doesn't change things much because they are law abiding citizens. What does tend to happen is fewer people get killed with the non-law abiding citizen starts a shooting rampage and then is confronted by the gun carrying law-abiding citizen. That's what happened in Oregon.

Comment Re:Blood is on the NRA Hands (Score 4, Insightful) 1862

I've looked at the statistics, unfortunately most of the studies on defensive gun use were done back in the 1990's and many are 20 years old at this point. The National Crime Victimization Survey circa 1993 was the lowest of the lot citing an estimated 108,000 Defensive Gun Uses per year. The Kleck studies put that number higher at between 650k - and 2.5M per year. The Kleck piece is Gary, Kleck and Marc Gertz, "Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevelance and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun", Journal of
Criminal Law and Criminology 1995, Vol. 86 No. 1

If you don't like the Kleck study(s) for whatever reason he the National Insitute of Justice that came up with 1.5M defensive uses of firearms per year: Philip J. Cook and Jens Ludwig, "Guns in America: National Survey on Private Ownership and Use of Firearms," NIJ Research in Brief (May 1997).

The flip side of those studies being that old now is there are all of critical reviews of their data and methodology at this point.

Even if we take the lowest number of defensive gun uses at an average of 108,000 per years, the number of times a firearm was used to stop a crime was still over 3 times the total number of gun deaths. And depending on the defition of defensive gun use, oftentimes "using a firearm" means drawing and presenting the gun is enough to stop the crime or potential crime without a shot being fired.

An incident that happened to me a couple years ago. It was a hot muggy July day and I was sitting in city traffic. I had the windows rolled down as my car was old and starting to overheat so I wasn't running A/C. Some guy opened my car door, got in, and started to tell me where to drive until he looked over and saw the barrel of the revolver I had on me at the time. His eyes got large and he promptly got out of my car and walked off. To this day I have no idea why he got in my car. Did he mean me harm? I don't know. All I know is that I didn't know him, he wasn't supposed to be there, and my revolver ended the situation and no shots were fired.

Now if you want to look at statistics consider this: violent crime in the US has dropped over 50% of it's 1992 levels. The reasons are likely many, many factors. I'm sure economy, more forrms of electronic entertainment, more people allowed to carry concealed all factor into that. The violent crime rate last year for England and Wales was 4x that of the US. In fact it was almost TWICE the the 1992 US rate of violent crime.

If you break down the homicide rates in the US, as the Justice Statistics has, with the latest report I found being from 2008, amoung whites, the murder rate is a little higher at around 1.6/100k, but still within the same rates as most of Western Europe. But amoung the black population it was 8.6/100k and 8.2/100k in the hispanic population increasing the overall homicide rate in the US to around 4 - 5/100k. Sucide rates didn't look much different between the US and Europe. Yes more people used guns to commit sucicide, but it suggests that if guns were not used they would have found another way.

Personally the 28 guns deaths vs the 100 or more crimes that were prevented by guns per day is a price that I can live with.

Comment A lot of these people don't understand... (Score 4, Interesting) 758

A few years ago the closest grocery store to where I was living was a Coop. Which was great in the summer because it was stocked with a lot of fresh stuff from local farmers (it was a rural college town).

Well one of my biggest sources of income is the family farms I've inherited along with my Dad that we lease out. We're semi involved helping the farmer with trying new methods on our farms trying to boost yields (Rice & Soybeans are the primary crop, some years corn). This is mainly my father as he's retired and it gives him something to do, but as he's gotten up into his 70's I've started to take a more involved role in things.

One time I was at the Coop and commented about rice and lack of a particular brand that we sold our rice to which led to a conversation with one of the patrons who flipped out when I mentioned we had switched to a new hybrid seed. She went on this total anti-GMO rant at which point there were several people looking on and I said, "I said Hybrid. As in Rice A was bred with Rice B to produce the strain we plant. Farmers have been doing this for centuries now. Pretty much everything in your bag has been Genetically Modified using cross breeding."

Then I left and went on about my business leaving her red in the face not exactly sure how to respond to that.

And that's what I've never understood. To these people using cross breeding and classical Mendelian genetics to modify plants are fine. But go in scientifically and do the same thing in a sophisticated lab and suddenly it's evil.

Comment Re:Comment on Movie length (Score 1) 245

When I lived in Germany the movies had about a 10 - 15 intermission. They'd come around with snack trays like venders at a ball game here in the states. Even for 90 minute comedies there were intermissions. It was wonderful during longer movies. And probably made the theaters more money as people would use the restroom and usually by another beer, soda, snacks (the concept of free refills doesn't really exist in Europe).

Comment Re:Get rid of printers (Score 1) 285

There is a lot of truth in this. After my last printer quit I don't have one in my home anymore. If I need to print something I'll go to the office supply store. Usually it is for a work presentation I was going there anyway to get color copies made.

I've not even had to print an invoice in over a year. They are all emailed to clients and the clients I have now I don't have problems getting paid from.

Comment Re:What is the point (Score 1) 88

This is really a hedge against Google. WIth Google aquiring Motorola Mobility, they are actually posed to start producing their own consumer oriented branded hardware for Android. This far the "Google phones/tablets" have really been aimed at developers, not the end consumers. Therefore they aren't a perceived threat to Samsung. But the instant Google gets serious about releasing their own branded hardware aimed at consumers you'll notice how quickly Samsung will start to ship other OSes.

Comment If you spend money on F2P... (Score 4, Insightful) 377

You'd better view it as an entertainment expense no different than cable TV or going to see a Movie or a play or a baseball game. That's what I do. I play Star Trek Online. About once a month I buy $20 worth of game cards. When I went out on a week night to watch a game with friends at a sports bar I'd spend at least that much, probably more on food and drink. Hell It's $15 to see a movie anymore for 2 hours of entertainment. I play STO 20 - 30 hours a month.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...