I used the root on ZFS instructions for Debian and they worked pretty well for Devuan. You have to change some commands and package names a little bit for sysvinit instead of systemd, but everything you need is in the repos.

I did my install with Devuan 4, but I upgraded and am now running Devuan 5 with kernel 6.6.13, and pipewire/wireplumber. The only vestige of PoetteringOS on my system is pulseaudio, which is not running. It's there for the client libraries, and for the package dependency for volume controls for X desktops.

It's not a big deal to just have more libraries installed in most cases. It would be nice if it were a little easier, though. You can have as many versions of whatever library around as you want, that's not a problem, but then there's those libraries' associated resource files in /usr/share or whatever.

This is dependent on state law. In California, it does unless the crosswalk is at a controlled intersection, where only the lights and signs can grant the right of way. We now have no jaywalking laws, and when you are not in a defined crosswalk, you do not have the right of way as a pedestrian. When you are then you do.

Pedestrians in crosswalks have the right of way in California.

We also recently got a law saying that you can't park within I forget how many feet (20?) of a crosswalk or corner unless there are curb extensions. So now they are putting curb extensions in towns all over so they don't lose parking. I actually heard some people complain about how this was going to cause damage to vehicles driving over the curb extensions, it was fairly hilarious. Like uh, open your eyes and look you schmucks.

It's good mostly for the owning class, though, since trickle down doesn't. Remember, the money is spent five times or so if it's handed to the poor, or only a couple of times if it's handed to the wealthy, before it sits around like a turd and stops employing anyone because it's no longer being spent.

Apple got to where it is now with the iPhone. Full stop. It was not a fluke, nor did it come out of the blue since the iPhone could not have happened without the Newton before it, because that was the motivation for Apple's investment in ARM.

As such, Apple should be continually casting a wide net to find the next thing. That means knowing that you will throw a certain amount of R&D money into the void and hoping that it will work out for you one day because you own the IP. This is, once again, a necessary and large portion of how the iPhone came to be such a wild success for Apple. The Newton was never a financial success for Apple even though they tried several iterations, and finally gave up on the platform entirely. But once the maturity of the mobile hardware had advanced sufficiently that the same OS that ran on the desktops could run on affordable handhelds, that experience and the foundation laid with the hardware could pay off. If Apple doesn't continue to make those attempts, then they are setting themselves up for eventual failure.

They obviously know this, and they have in fact pursued a reasonably diverse set of potential opportunities including automotive applications and AR, but as they are swollen with cash it is also reasonable to argue that they ought to be doing more. If they want the best chance at the next big thing, they've got to keep trying more new things. It also, by the way, employs more people...

It seems like the sensible fix is to make it possible to pull that data from one Mastodon server to the next, whether this creates a standard or not is irrelevant to the particular problem. With my complete ignorance of the codebase this seems relatively trivial as tasks go given that they already have syndication features in the platform, but as there are many things I don't know about it perhaps there's some reason why this is difficult.

Let me expand on my statement. In my last comment in this thread, and as I stated, I was calling out the moderators who sought to suppress my questions.

In my comment before that, I was first asking you to support your assertion about the necessity of slavery, and secondly (and at least to some degree separately) I was asking you to support the idea that he deserved some slack because he was old. He's supposed to be a significant character not only for his factual observations but for his moral ones, so I'm inclined to hold him to a higher standard than average. Even at the time there were those who were not slaves who yet opposed slavery.

You can't just say slavery was a necessity and expect to go unopposed, can you?

Some believe Jesus was an Essene, and they were into studying books, so if he existed and he was an essene then it's conceivable that he learned to read in the decades of his life where nothing was written about him.

I see that at least one of the people getting modpoints from this site is a proud defender of slavery. Keep it classy, B!zX.

They should check out the open bugs for Firefox or KDE sometime. Some of them are years old.

False. North America is a continent and what the GP was talking about was first the "American Colonies" of Great Britain and then it was the "United States of America". In neither case is one talking about the land which would become known as Canada and The United States of America. The nation is relevant because it was the laws of the nations involved which permitted the particular arrangement of slavery which we are discussing.

[citation needed]

Why? Old men have had a whole lifetime to learn not to be a prick.

Rail, ofc. Delete the bulk of the long range, high speed highway lanes and replace them with it. Most of the up front cost is the right of way, using the centers of highways makes it cheap. The nation was headed that way until the streetcar conspiracy.

That's partly the algorithm too, though. The speed sensitive cruise control systems should not permit you to choose a following distance which is so excessively close.

But then, that exposes a flaw of the whole system: IME, there is not enough road for all the cars which must use it at commute time to maintain a safe following distance. If they did, then they would be spaced out in such a way that there would not be enough room for them to actually be on the highway, and traffic would simply back up in the places which feed into it. As well, it would never be safe to enter the highway, because there would never be a clear space long enough to enter with safe following distance (and leaving it for the driver behind.) Vast numbers of onramps would have to be altered to address this deficiency. I suspect that mandatory and thus ubiquitous AEB is going to expose this flaw rapidly, with chaos at every onramp.