Comment Re:Could Browsers Settled on an Alternate Language (Score 1) 205
it works? damn I'll have to take a look at using it then, trying to make fancier things work with dom and css is just a bitch! I mean, covering desktop ie/firefox/chrome is no problem but covering mobile versions of those at the same time is. javascript itself isn't a problem for me, I like node.js despite it's limits too surprisingly lot(I've just been doing js for a year or so.. from java/c++ background it's not so bad). sure, you'll lose css but that's not that big of an issue when in all cases when I've been told to just "edit the css to make it flexible" is almost the same as saying "fuck you and the horse I put under you", and a widget system built for it would take care of most things. I suppose for input you'll have to either do a lot of work or hack in some html parts to take care of that.
yeah, logically, the thing is to just go around the dom - it was never intended for application development. if web apps try to be first class apps that's pretty much the way to go... problem with html+css is usually that people who aren't executing things just see some css trick or another and then just want that implemented in something where it just doesn't work by adding two lines of css.
native client & etc are really just about launchers. kind of defeats the purpose as run anywhere for now.