Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Well, there's one logical consequence (Score 2) 149

Pharmaceutical research (i.e., the search for new medications) is also (and has been for decades) disproportionately funded by America. Europe and a few other countries (e.g., Japna, South Korea) do also contribute, but their contributions are consistently a much, much smaller portion of their GDP.

Comment Re:Well, there's one logical consequence (Score 1) 149

I don't know if that's going to work, given that the youth unemployment rate has gotten so high they've stopped publishing numbers for it, because either they'd be too high to publish under Chinese law, or else no one would believe them. Granted, that's not tech-sector-specific, but a *lot* of those unemployed young people are college educated, and STEM fields are quite popular over there. Employers may in fact be in a stronger negotiating position than the prospective employees.

Comment Re:That's 50 down, 950 to go (Score 1) 225

Frankly, the only reason groups like these continue to exist is because people believe their BS.

Frankly, you've swallowed a fair amount of BS yourself.

Israel isn't engaging in "apartheid", they evacuated the Gaza Strip in 2005, and it has been run by Hamas ever since.

They 'evacuated' because it wasn't really part of their vision of Biblical Israel, and it helped split the Palestinian Authority.

They aren't engaging in "ethnic cleansing",

They're just removing ethnic Palestinians from their communities in the West Bank (not to mention some literal talk of ethnically cleansing Gaza from Israeli Ministers.

they're not the ones stockpiling weapons and command centers in hospitals, schools, and homes, that's what Hamas is doing.

Hamas are definitely bad guys, but that's pretty much what any force does when fighting against a much stronger enemy.

Nor are they "colonizing" the Gaza Strip,

Not anymore, though they might again soon.

they literally built a wall around it to separate themselves from it.

Hence the folks complaining about an "open air prison".

I'm no Israel apologist, but BS is BS, it smells the same all over the world. It's a lot more important to use the brain God gave you than to be "on the right side of history". Stop listening to these guys.

You kinda are.

Now to be clear, if you look at things from the Israeli perspective the narrative isn't that bad. Jews were brutally persecuted everywhere they went, they were given a chance to relocate to their ancestral homeland, and they took that opportunity.

The problem is, if you look at things from the Palestinian perspective the narrative isn't that bad either. Palestinians were living as the majority as they had for almost 2000 years, having been promised self-rule for rebelling against the Turks in WWI. Instead Britain allowed a bunch of Jews to immigrate, buy land, and eventually gave them a big chunk of the country. When they fought back the new Jewish state took even more land and at this point seems very determined to eventualy take the whole of Mandatory Palestine.

Yeah, there's a bunch of legitimate grievances on both sides, but the underlying problem is that Western powers screwed up in early 1900s, started giving Jews a claim to someone elses land, and created a situation that is very difficult to deescalate.

Comment Re:Why so slow to refuel? (Score 1) 157

In case someone was wondering why it can take over an hour to refuel, it's not because of the pumps as the summary erroneously mentions. According to the article:

In some cases, drivers would pull up to a pump only to find another car frozen to the hydrogen nozzle due to the extremely low temperatures where hydrogen is stored. This turned five-minute fueling sessions into an hour or more of being stuck while waiting for a station tech to arrive and unfreeze the car.

To me, this looks like poor design of the pump and/or the car. Heat tracing, anyone?

True, though it also suggests that the technology is fairly complicated. Traditional gas stations don't have the requirement that you store the gas in ultra-low temperatures. Not only does that create more complicated storage requirements but more complicated mechanism to deal with that temperature gradient when refuelling.

Sure, it probably gets more reliable as the tech improves, but it definitely sounds like there's a safety issue that will require skilled personnel on an ongoing basis.

Comment Re:Read the original article (Score 2) 201

EVs don't scale well. At a gas station if you have two people in front of you, you wait 20 minutes. At an EV charging stand on the highway, lets say you can get the fastest charger; you may be waiting for an hour before you start to charge. That could be the difference between being relaxed for a flight and getting stressed out making it there just in time. The world has changed since the horse and buggy. Those days are gone, and a lot of times people are just trying to keep their schedule and know they can make it somewhere on time.

The difference is that a gas station requires a massive capital investment to build. An EV charging stand just needs the same electricity as any other business. In the long term it might be efficient for the market to produce an excess of charging stations.

Comment Re:past is no longer a guide to the future, Really (Score 1) 170

"this current change isn't really predicted by current models."

Huh? Then what are all those models alarmists have been screaming about?

The models have errors and uncertainties, including about when we might hit various tipping points.

The fear is that the "alarmists" were wrong, and the climate is warming faster than they thought.

Comment Re:Why didn't COVID drop CO2 levels? (Score 1) 170

I have read multiple articles in "peer reviewed" journals, trying to explain why atmospheric CO2 didn't drop when emissions plummeted, and why the earth got warmer when atmospheric pollution levels droped. The articles are gibberish.

Atmospheric CO2 takes a very long time to drop (and we're still adding more) and when pollution dropped more sunlight got through and raised temps slightly.

Sorry if that's too complicated for you.

I do remember that the environmental "science" classes I peeked at, then immediately dropped, when course shopping undergrad, contained the stupidist collection of humans I have ever run across.

Don't worry, the average intelligence jumped way up after you dropped.

I remember discussing the effect of the sun on the earth's temps with some enviro science professor, long ago. He said the sun had "no effect."

The prof was assuming you were smart enough to understand that everyone would know the sun warms the earth.

He was saying that sun's output was constant enough to have no effect.

Since I've finally realized how dumb the average person on earth really is, I don't care any more.

The midwit phenomenon is the great truth of our age.

I hope you can take some solace in the fact that the average person is still apparently much smarter than you.

Comment Re:The limits of science (Score 3, Insightful) 77

Certain topics do not lend themselves very well to the scientific method.

It's kind of hard to set up 100 universes, say, and run them through a few billion years. You can't do the experiment part.

Sometimes a hypothesis has potentially observable implications, even if a mad scientist can't reproduce everything in their lab.

Submission + - Canada's Disastrous ArriveCan App Received a Procurement Award

belmolis writes: During Covid, the Canada Border Services Agency created ArriveCan, an app that allows travelers entering Canada to electronically submit travel documents and customs declarations. The app was so buggy that many could not use it, and erroneously ordered thousands of travelers to quarantine. At C$59.5 (US$48.4) million it was far more expensive than the initial C$80,0000 estimate.The procurement process was recently severely criticized by Auditor General Karen Hogan in a scathing report. It has now been reported that the team responsible for ArriveCan received an Unsung Heroes award from the Canadian Institute for Procurement and Material Management for its work.

Comment Re:Smells like static equilibrium to me (Score 1) 258

If the test article is not moving it does no work so no violation of conservation of energy. But as you point out you are going to need to carefully eliminate quite a lot, as everything contains electrons, those electrons can move and create polarization which can create electrostatic forces often in unexpected way. When I was playing with electrostatics it was terribly easy to get this wrong even in very simple scenarios. I expect a guy with as much experience as this guy purports to have would know that, but then, even the best of us get excited and overlook things.

The world is full of folks with impressive credentials, it's inevitable a few of them will dive headfirst into crackpot theories for a variety of reasons.

Not to say this guy is a crackpot, but what he's claiming should be pretty easy to demonstrate to credible outside experts. That he hasn't done that rings many alarm bells.

Slashdot Top Deals

The moon is made of green cheese. -- John Heywood

Working...