Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Different kinds of smart (Score 2) 124

There's the kind of smart that gets you a tech job. Then there's the kind of smart that knows better than to go balls deep financing a Bay Area home and a luxury car. There's the kind of smart that knows the cops can crash your party any time. I know I've got it, but I kind of wish I'd had the 3rd kind of smart that pounds just a little while longer; but that brings us to yet another kind of smart: The kind of smart that goes in to work the day after your doctor says your blood pressure is high, and makes you think about how all the money isn't worth it if job stress kills you before 50.

Comment Didn't plastic recycling "work"? (Score 1) 101

IIRC, plastic recycling did "work" for quite a while. I'm putting work in quotes because the way it "worked" was to bundle that stuff up and send it to China, where something could in theory be done with it--but as labor costs rose and the quality of the feedstock failed to improve it became impractical once again. Even if China was always land-filling the stuff, our "recycling" program "worked". Now it doesn't.

Comment Apples and oranges (Score 1) 148

The Boeing hit doesn't qualify as a conspiracy theory--yet.

I define a conspiracy theory as: A belief that a conviction should occur, in the absence of a credible indictment.

Since the coroner hasn't even issued a report yet AFAIK, this can't be a conspiracy yet. Note also that in order to be a conspiracy theory by my definition, mere suspicion is not sufficient. You must *believe* whole heartedly that the crime occurred. Thus, you can be suspicious of Epstein's death and not be a conspiracy theorist. It's only when you assert with authority that you *know* he was assassinated that you become a conspiracy theorist because to reiterate, you can't prove that assertion. You have no credible indictment. The professionals who do that for a living couldn't come up with one, and neither can you.

That brings us to Covid. There are a lot of ideas floating around about it, and not all of them are equal. BiLL gATEs pUt 5G iN yOUR aRm. Is not the same as "They released this on purpose to sell vaccines". The former flies in the face of all reason, whereas the latter lays out a reasonable motive and opportunity; but it still asserts without an indictment and is thus still a conspiracy theory--it's just that it's not as crazy as the first one.

So. Apples and oranges. At this point, a suspicion that the whistleblower was assassinated doesn't make you a conspiracy theorist. Real investigators who don't live in their Mom's basement are looking in to it, and they're not crazy. They're not conspiracy theorists. If their reports don't satisfy us, that widens the net of potential participants in a conspiracy, and as real conspiracies get large they tend to unravel. It takes time, but it does happen; so I'm not in denial over the fact that some "conspiracy theories" do in fact become "conspiracy fact"; but in the meantime you're better off (and less likely to be regarded as a nut) if you express suspicion rather than certitude that something evil has occurred.

Comment After a certain point (Score 3, Informative) 95

After a certain point, they could fill drives with the output of a real random number generator? Who's gonna check?

Ha-hah, only serious; but there's actually a really good answer for this. There is an algorithm for finding the Nth digit of Pi, and it's *fast*, not requiring you to compute previous digits. Thus, spot-checking the data for accuracy is very doable.

Comment Fond memories (Score 1) 74

This reminds me of the good ol' days when Rob Cockerham sent in spray-painted trinkets to Cash 4 Gold. (warning expired cert).

He also gave out his Safeway card number to see what would happen if you spent $100s of thousands on one card. Not sure how that played out.

I miss the old Internet that didn't even care about SSL, and where pranks involved making companies looked silly instead of sucker-punching people.

Anyway, I hope they keep sending weird shit to companies. We need this.

Comment Re: I always go with the next-door/harm rule (Score 1) 85

You didn't actually comprehend what I wrote. The "next door" rule extends to "next office", and "adjacent activities". You should have inferred that from my proposal that they be BARRED FROM THE FINANCE BUSINESS FOR LIFE AND NOT ALLOWED TO LEAVE THE COUNTRY.

The next door rule is a colloquial way of expressing the idea that incarceration should be based on their odds of causing harm if living outside of bars, not a literal idea that release is only contingent on harm to immediate neighbors.

Comment I always go with the next-door/harm rule (Score 1) 85

I don't care about punishment. I think it's petty. I go by the "would I want them next door?" or "what's the harm of letting them out?" rule. Also, I believe in humane economic confinement and listening to science on recidivism and such.

Anyway, it will cost a lot of money to incarcerate somebody that long. If he's next door to me, he's not a problem because he wasn't convicted of playing his music too loud. If he's able to participate in finance, that's the real demonstrated potential for harm so I say release him NOW, but don't give him a passport or let him participate in any kind of financial operation where he handles money, not even running the cash register... OK, maybe that; but you get the idea. No employment at any financial institution of any kind, not even as a temp or consultant. He's going to have to find another line of work, but I don't feel like feeding and housing him for the next 50 years.

Slashdot Top Deals

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...