Look at the terms of service and you will notice they explicitly state that they will not be held liable for anything. You have no recourse unless they have acted criminally and can be prosecuted using statutory laws that override the contract terms.
Here in the UK there is a huge scam called conveyance, where you hire a solicitor to handle the buying and selling of your home. The idea is that you have a sense of security that you have someone who is responsible for the transaction that can be held liable if anything goes wrong. The reality is that no liability is accepted by the solicitor in their contract with you and no solicitor has ever been successfully held responsible for mistakes they have made. The whole professional services market is money for old rope.
Non executive directors are recruited for the influence they have through their business connections, or as a way to pay for a favour previously given.
Lawmakers showing their ignorance again. While is mostly possible to tape out a basic RISC-V processor using one of the open designs, each manufacturer has their own design, if a company figured out how to implement RISC-5 in a way that left intel and arm in the dust, they would keep that to itself.
However, even if they were openly sharing, it would make no difference. China has no regard for intellectual property, if they want something they will just copy it. At least in an open environment, other countries can benefit from what China contributes.
The problem is many western countries, especially the USA and UK have very high opinions of their own place in the world, they see themselves as intellectually superior and countries like China as backward. While there are many failings and much not to like about the Chinese government, they are fast becoming one of the world’s largest economies, and as a result they are developing a high standard of education, whereas education standards in the US and UK have fallen dramatically due to underinvestment.
There is a world of difference between holding an event where women are actively encouraged to consider roles in tech and a recruitment event that try’s to exclude a particular group of people. If anything l think the men that turned up were using their imitative to try and get a job.
The ONLY criteria that recruitment should be based on is ability to do the job, if there are too few women with the required experience or qualifications that is not fixed by excluding men from access to recruiters, it is fixed by getting more girls in school taking appropriate subjects and for career advisers to actively promote tech careers to girls. Once people are adults it is too late to change the balance.
"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds