Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:When no one is employed (Score 1) 102

any other low talent industry. i doubt they grew up dreaming of working in a call centre, they probably did it for the money, like most people.

That's very much my point. They are already doing a shit job because it was all that was available. Now what are they supposed to get, a shittier job? It's hard to find one that pays, as backwards as that is.

you dont half chat some shit sometimes.

I'm not new, friend.

Comment Re:EU investigation (Score 1) 30

Please please please write a screed explaining how forcing Apple to use stuff that users want them to use and support things users want them to support with absolutely zero harm to other users who simply don't turn on any additional features which will be disabled by default is bad for consumers. And don't cheat and use AI, really lean into it.

Comment Re: Unaccountable bureaucrats (Score 3, Insightful) 88

"I await their decision on EV producers and the huge quantity of dangerous particulates EV's spew into the atmosphere."

The only particulates that EVs spew into the atmosphere are tire dust, and not much more than other vehicles - or if LRR tires are used, less than most.

If you mean during production, or pollution from generating power to charge the vehicle, even if charged purely with coal the lifecycle emissions are lower by the time an EV hits 70k miles.

TL;DR: Bullshit.

Comment Re:Obligatory... (Score 2) 182

I've never thought of grouping niche forums and IRC in the "social media" category. My (brainwashed) mind has always thought that social media was the icon set that people put on brochures (Fecebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter). Unless it was in that set, I didn't see it as social media.

IRC is, IMO much more social as it's much more immediate than the others, I've just never seen it branded like the others.

Curious to me why I've never done that.

Comment no shit (Score 3, Insightful) 182

"TikTok owner ByteDance would prefer shutting down its loss-making app rather than sell it"

Yes, that's because its purpose is not profit, as it's a PsyOp. If the goal were profit, they would prefer to sell it. If they sell it, there is a risk that documents which prove its purpose will be transferred, and blow the whole operation even worse than being shut down.

Comment Re: modding me down won't change facts (Score 1) 102

"It's probably because you're asserting that the mod down process validates your "facts"."

If you want to claim what I'm saying isn't factual, the onus is on you to provide some counter evidence, or at minimum, counter arguments. When people mod down an opinion because they don't agree with it they have surrendered the point.

Slashdot Top Deals

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...