"[T]here is not a shortage of security generalists, middle managers, and people who claim to be competent CISOs. Nor is there a shortage of thought leaders, advisors, or self-proclaimed cyber subject matter experts. What there is a shortage of are computer scientists, developers, engineers, and information security professionals who can code, understand technical security architecture, product security and application security specialists, analysts with threat hunting and incident response skills. And this is nothing that can be fixed by a newbie taking a six-month information security boot camp...." The complexity collapse is developing.

It could just be long term planning for moon bases and moon communications like Starlink.

And the truly frightening thing is that the AI may do this entirely on its own to accomplish a task it has been assigned.

The real problem is that as AI wipes out jobs in a particular area it wipes out human expertise in those areas, freezing advance in those areas. AI advances nothing. The level of expertise will freeze when human participants in a particular area fall below a certain number. And that applies to absolutely any area of human expertise. The result will be stagnation. And once you interrupt the human path to advancement in any area, it is broken. How do you regain it? You can't. Once you go AI then, you can't go back to humans.

The proposal should attack growing complexity in all things or "complexity pollution" by mandating the the system be as simple as possible.

The real AI problem is that it will replace the mass of people in a subject area, including the experts, and freeze the level of expertise in a subject area in which there will no longer be enough motivated and experienced humans to push forward the state of the art or understanding of the subject area. Let the AI do they work, lose the ability to do the work yourself. Let the car drive, and lose the ability to drive yourself. Let the AI write and lose the ability to write yourself. Let the AI do medicine and lose the ability to do medicine yourself. Let the AI do math and lose the ability to do math yourself. Let the AI teach, and lose teachers and the advancement of the art of teaching.

AI is a black box now. Imagine what it will be in the future. It will find a way around all blocks if it thinks it must to accomplish a goal. And the path it takes will be completely unknowable.

AI is interesting, but it will never be reliable and useful because it will always be dangerous. AI is functional intelligence without any checks-and-balances part to a complex motivation array - as humans have. Ours was developed over billions of years and is most clearly shown in our moral codes, our laws and our social judgments. AI has none of that.

I'm not sure that the massive funding for programs that only provide data to satisfy the curiosity of specialist scientists and which are otherwise useless to those who fund them is justified.

The delusion of the age of AI has begun though. It will be the errors that AI will always make that will make it a problem, and a destructive and dangerous one. There will always be a nagging uncertainty that comes from not ever really knowing if the AI is actually making an error in any particular circumstance because it will never be clear how it came to its decision.

Have an AI create and solve scenarios constantly as a stream of consciousness as humans do. Have an ai present itself constantly with internal thought tasks, about the physical world and not about the physical world, to solve problems not posed to it, as humans do. Perhaps have it in parallel with external tasks like a subconscious.

They have to add a couple more zs and xs and many more numbers and perhaps a cubed root or two before I'm impressed.

It was transferred in the sense that we stopped most production here and bought from them instead. The purchase of chips for American companies no longer came as much from chip makers in America.

Isn't a heart just a heart, a brain just a brain separate from everything else it needs to work? No.

It is done for political reasons.