Do you develop on GitHub? You can keep using GitHub but automatically sync your GitHub releases to SourceForge quickly and easily with this tool so your projects have a backup location, and get your project in front of SourceForge's nearly 20 million monthly users. It takes less than a minute. Get new users downloading your project releases today!
"blockquote" Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
, and
"quote" Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
are accepted, but according to my regular HTML references "quote" has been deprecated (since 3.2?) for "q" Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.. So, how does Slash mangle them?
I've never used the ecode formatting before either. How does that look?
<b>"ecode"</b> Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
.
How does that look?
So, "blockquote" indents and left-side bar ; greyed text ; "quote" indents more, left side bar, regular text colour ; "q" is ignored ; "ecode" indents, side-bars, greys, and monospaces. I'll just stick with "blockquote".
Who can't handle "Apple-ish" funny quotes, without for one second considering the more difficult question of non-Latin characters and other HTML entities.
For clarity, the problem seems to be (not an Apple-eater myself) that Apple, with some level of automation, substitute a typographical double- (or single-) quote pair where the text file has (had) an ASCII double- or single-quote pair in it. SlashCode has more problems with HTML and Unicode entities, but this particular bug is particularly common. And annoying.
Anoxic Atmospheres on Mars Driven by Volcanism: Implications for Past Environments and Life
The current atmosphere of Mars is low pressure, but oxidising (largely because water gets split by UV high in the atmosphere, the hydrogen is lost to space but the oxygen (hydroxyl molecules) is heavy enough (has a short enough mean free path) to be retained in the atmosphere ; the iron in the surface rocks turns red (goes to +3 oxidation state). Which is well and good, and well understood. But... oxygen does horrible things to biochemistry. Ask any SCUBA diver who has read up on the biochemistry of oxygen toxicity. While biological systems can learn how to handle having the poisonous stuff around, it needs a fair amount of biochemical machinery to contain and manage the poison. After a few hundred million years to a billion years, life on Earth managed to learn how to handle it and survived the "Great Oxidation Event". But all serious models for the origin of life on Earth depend on having initially a reducing atmosphere, unlike that of today's planet (and Mars). Mars today has no observed volcanism, but relatively fresh volcanic landforms suggests there is some volcanism from time to time. Impacts can also inject surface material into the atmosphere without active volcanism.
This study describes a model of the influence of volcanism on the oxidation state of the Martian atmosphere. A modest (more than ~0.14cu.km per year, around 1% of Earth's rate) amount of basaltic volcanism would be able to make the current atmosphere reducing, and volcanism was likely to be more common in the past, so the atmosphere of early Mars was probably often reducing, which is generally expected to be a good thing for a local origin of life. Also, an atmosphere which changed between reducing (after a large impact or volcanism) and oxidising (under the continuing influence of solar radiation) might actually stimulate the development of interesting chemistry (a.k.a "life").
Chemical signatures of previous reducing atmospheres which could be measured with current and future Mars rovers are discussed.
Arxiv 2103.13304 "Automatic planetary defense : Deflecting NEOs by missiles shot from L1 and L3 (Earth-Moon)" proposes that
-1- hitting a PHA at 90deg to it's orbit is most likely to produce a large course change. I think that's pretty obvious once you look at it.
-2- this can be achieved at more manageable cost from L1/ L3, which are always in sight of Earth (radio communications). An elliptical orbit CONFOCAL (having the same focal points as) to the PHA's hyperbolic orbit will intersect the PHA at 90deg. I'm not entirely sure what the L1/ L3 brings to it other than relative stability and line-of-sight.
-3- there remains the problem of determining the PHA's orbit sufficiently accurately sufficiently soon. Time-of-flight from L1/ L3 to half-way across the Earth-Moon system remains significant, O(1day).
-4- Launching a salvo of missiles would produce lower risk-of-miss.
-5- Wouldn't a missed missile return to (close to) L1/ L3, potentially for re-use or re-fuelling?
-6- If so, why not produce a stream of orbiting missiles needing relatively small course adjustments to reach a PHA, so approximating a permanent defence system?
-7- doesn't the L1 Sun-Earth point present the same benefits... no, we're looking at PHAs which may impact the central body, and we don't care about rocks hitting the Sun.
-8- You'd need two streams of missiles in clockwise/ counter-clockwise orbits to reach most orbits efficiently. Would you need some at moderate inclinations to cover out-of-Fundamental Plane objects? Or... the contra-rotating missile streams being at 45deg to the Fundamental Plane to cover both options.
-9- Somewhat related, what would be the benefits of Earth-Sun L4/ L5 points for positioning earth-scanning telescopes to scan for PHAs.
-n-
The detailed paper (Acta.Astro 50 185 (2002) is hidden and SciHub blocked now. Asked author for a copy (ore re-post yo Arxiv?). Need a VPN.
All the usual hype is flowing about Vista 8. This mostly means that Vista 7 was a failure, but I decided to log it for laughs. Vista 7 did not sell as well as Vista did and Vista 8 won't sell any better than Vista 7. Vista failure has really killed Microsoft. The upgrade inevitability myth is six feet underground, traditional desktops are becoming a thing of the past and everyone looks to Google, Apple even IBM for cool and reliable computing. Despite that, Microsoft brings out the same old lines and strategies.
06/02 - A fawning article from business insider. We get all the usual BS, "riskiest OS ever," "biggest step forward in more than 20 years, when it pushed Windows as the replacement for DOS", "underneath that layer is the old Windows that users are accustomed to. It will run old Windows apps", Linux and Apple are too jarring, expensive and suck, and so on and so forth.
Between launch and June 30, 2010 -- a period of 251 days -- Microsoft sold 0.78 Windows 7 licenses for each PC sold. Between July 1, 2010, and April 22, 2011 -- a period of 275 days -- Microsoft sold 0.67 Windows 7 licenses for each PC sold: 175 million Windows 7 licenses, and 260 million new PCs. To turn the numbers the other way around, in the past nine months, more than one-third of all new PCs sold didn't have Windows 7.... it's entirely possible that 40 percent of all new PCs in the past nine months shipped without Windows 7. Maybe more.
So, the Windows 7 PC sales "refresh" is over. Business adoption rates are still under 10%. Kanthryn Noyles of Computer World interprets that as a Win for gnu/linux
I think it's fair to assume that a good number of them are running Linux instead. Preloaded options, after all, are increasingly common, and the reasons to switch are more compelling with each passing Patch Tuesday.
Android/Linux, is another reason for the decline. Why sit around mom's basement with a big, noisy PC when you can drop the net in your pocket? PCs are less important and Windows is downright archaic.
The best way to understand what Florian has been doing is to make a list of it. Here then, is a list of what he's been telling Slashdot readers over the last year or so, with context and links to refutations as time allows.
That's 16 articles in less than a year and each represents dozens of Microsoft press echos. All of it says something bad about Google, Red Hat, IBM and other free software users. When he's not busy smearing Microsoft competitors, he's telling us that they Love Microsoft and are working with them towards some noble goal.
I simply can't believe how awful Windows is, and (unfortunately) how gullible I am. [my laptop] came loaded with Vista Business, and a "fallback" DVD for XP Professional. I tried running Vista on it. I really tried, I really wanted it to work, and I said exactly that in my blog here. But it didn't. Every time I tried it, things started out looking promising, and after a month or two it would go belly-up. Three or four times I reloaded Vista from scratch and tried again, hoping that the latest Microsoft Updates would fix it. Eventually I gave up, reloaded one last time with XP Professional, and ran that with no problem for two years.
A month or so ago, through my own carelessness, I wiped the disk on this laptop. I had to reload everything from scratch, so (like a fool) I thought well, Vista SP2 is out, everyone says that it is "all fixed up now and works great, and reliably", so I'll try that again. I loaded Vista from scratch, added all the updates to SP2 and beyond, and I've been running it that way since. Until today.... Windows is unreliable garbage, it always has been, it always will be, and if you use it you should be willing to accept that risk. I am no longer willing to accept that risk, even part-time as a secondary operating system on this laptop. Windows is gone, it has puked all over its disk for the last time here, and I will not reload it. I am in the process of transferring the data to one of the Linux partitions - yes, Linux is quite happy to read the partition that Windows says is hopelessly corrupted.
Please, PLEASE, unless you want to hear a very long string of words that I learned during my military service, do NOT tell me that the "solution" to this problem is to give Microsoft even more money and "upgrade" to Windows 7.... if Vista is not stable, or reliable, then Microsoft should withdraw it and either offer a free "upgrade" to Windows 7 or offer a refund of the purchase cost.... I absolutely don't believe the Windows 7 is any better, any more stable or any more reliable than Vista. They come from Microsoft, they are utter garbage...
This is a sign of things to come for Windows. Windows 7 was predictably just as bad as Vista was. People no longer are falling for Microsoft's promises of "this version fixes everything."
A now-former writer for scholastic, Marc Millot, wrote an article accusing wide-ranging corruption in Obama administration awards of Race to the Top grants, implicating Andrew Rotham of EdSector. Rotham complained that the report was hearsay, which is not true but Scholastic pulled the report and fired Marc Millot anyway. As an advocate for clean government, I've got my fingers crossed hoping for a Streisand effect. Also, some of those need mirrors, ANDREW ROTHAM is trying to take down his own blog entry.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<style type="text/css" media="screen">/* To accomodate differing install paths of WordPress, images are referred only here, and not in the style.css file. If you prefer to use only CSS for colors then delete the following lines, and the image files. */
#page { background: url("http://www.eduwonk.com/wp-content/themes/nouveau-clean-12/images/background-wide.jpg") repeat-y top; border: none; }
#header { background: url("http://www.eduwonk.com/wp-content/themes/nouveau-clean-12/images/header.jpg") no-repeat bottom center; }
#footer { background: url("http://www.eduwonk.com/wp-content/themes/nouveau-clean-12/images/footer.jpg") no-repeat bottom; border: none;}/* If you don't want to use the template's images, you can also delete the following two lines. */
#header { height: 140px; width: 760px; }
#header-image { height: 140px; width: 760px; }/* To ease the insertion of a personal header image, just simply drop in an image called 'header.jpg' into your/images/ directory. Dimensions should be at least 760px x 200px. Anything above that will be cropped off. */
<div class="alignright"><a href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/02/take-the-points.html">Giving Too Many Points</a> »</div>
</div>
<div class="post" id="post-5434">
<h2><a href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/02/hogwarts-on-the-hudson.html" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent Link: Hogwarts On The Hudson?">Hogwarts On The Hudson?</a></h2>
<div class="entrytext">
<p>Wow. Jaw meet floor. <a href="http://www2.scholastic.com/browse/home.jsp">Scholastic</a>, a serious publisher in the education space (that produces some good products, for instance Read 180) <a href="http://scholasticadministrator.typepad.com/thisweekineducation/2010/02/millot-three-data-points-unconected-dots-or-a-warning.html">is now allowing its bloggers to call out senior government officials as corrupt on the basis of <em>anonymous third party hearsay and no evidence</em>.</a> We’ve crossed into a strange new - and unfortunate - world if this is the new norm or somehow even remotely acceptable.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> As you can tell from the now broken link it’s to Scholastic’s credit that they’ve removed the post.</p>
<p class="postmetadata alt">
<small>
This entry was posted
on Friday, February 5th, 2010 at 4:00 pm.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the <a href='http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/02/hogwarts-on-the-hudson.html/feed'>RSS 2.0</a> feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
</small>
</p>
</div>
</div>
<!-- You can start editing here. -->
<h3 id="comments">13 Responses to “Hogwarts On The Hudson?”</h3>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151201" title="">February 5th, 2010 at 4:38 pm</a> </small>
<p>seems like a reasonable blog post to me – he’s just asking for a bit more transparency to clear up any perception of favoritism. </p> <p>as he said, it’s not like it hasn’t happened before <img src='http://www.eduwonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley'/> </p>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151218" title="">February 5th, 2010 at 5:00 pm</a> </small>
<p>Steve F.-</p> <p>The first sentence is:</p> <p>“I have now heard the same thing from three independent credible sources – the fix is in on the U.S. Department of Education’s competitive grants, in particular Race to the Top (RTTT) and Investing in Innovation (I3). ”</p> <p>Not implying anything but just asking?</p>
</li>
<li class="alt" id="comment-151225">
<cite>steve f.</cite> Says:
<br/>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151225" title="">February 5th, 2010 at 5:04 pm</a> </small>
<p>it’s a blog, i’m not sure of the ethics of blog publishing.</p> <p>but the post is asking whether there is favoritism at the dept of ed? that’s reasonable in my book and could be cleared up easily through a transparent process.</p>
<p>the ny times uses anonymous sources all the time.</p>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151233" title="">February 5th, 2010 at 5:15 pm</a> </small>
<p>“Over the last several months a national education reporter, a senior manager at a national education research organization, and the head of a national nonprofit working in the field all volunteered that the Department’s senior officials know exactly who they want to get RTTT and I3 money – in brief, the new philanthropies’ grantees and the jurisdictions where they work. ”</p> <p>That is a reasonable question but the blog post is not asking whether there is favortism, it is *saying* there is favortism. The first line is “the fix is in” not “is the fix in?”</p>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151236" title="">February 5th, 2010 at 5:24 pm</a> </small>
<p>Pleeeez! Favoritism at the Dept of Ed? Who’s the secretary? While he may be a nice man and a class warrior, his position derives from the favoritism we now find problematic.</p>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151303" title="">February 5th, 2010 at 8:56 pm</a> </small>
<p>I feel certain that the taxpayers are about to be fleeced in the name of educational “reform.” Let’s hope someone with the right skills can find out what’s coming down the pike before it’s too late.</p> <p>The Reading First fiasco hurt a lot of children and lined a lot of pockets before the fraud was exposed. I don’t want to see this happen again.</p>
</li>
<li class="alt" id="comment-151305">
<cite>Edharris</cite> Says:
<br/>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151305" title="">February 5th, 2010 at 9:02 pm</a> </small>
<p>Some of the article is here:<br/> <a href="http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/02/millot-asks-about-conflict-of-interest.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2010/02/millot-asks-about-conflict-of-interest.html</a></p>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151798" title="">February 7th, 2010 at 6:41 am</a> </small>
<p>Clearly, we must applaud Scholastic’s journalistic integrity for not allowing its bloggers to call out senior public officials. Especially when, as you point out it sells “a lot of good products” and the senior official in question is capable of serious payback if the serious publisher were to allow such a breach in respect for senior government officials.</p> <p>That’s what journalistic standards are for: to protect our vulnerable senior government officials from unwarrented intrusion into their power to dispense payouts.</p>
</li>
<li class="" id="comment-151866">
<cite>Edharris</cite> Says:
<br/>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-151866" title="">February 7th, 2010 at 1:02 pm</a> </small>
<p>Two classic moments from film and TV come to mind.<br/> “I’m shocked, shocked, to find gambling going on in this establishment.”<br/>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-153652" title="">February 12th, 2010 at 12:48 pm</a> </small>
<p>The saga is being followed by me as well as others. Several bloggers, including me, have given Millot space to respond. Check my blog for updates if you are interested.</p>
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="#comment-154163" title="">February 13th, 2010 at 7:54 pm</a> </small>
<p>Mr. Millot:</p>
<p>You sound like a very wise man. You were one of the first writers to predict that Michelle Rhee couldn’t possibly succeed given her disdain for teachers.</p> <p>I hope you can continue to expose “reformers” who are poised to line their pockets with tax money meant for schoolchildren. Your skills as a lawyer should prove very helpful. Our country cannot afford another Reading First scam. Thank you.</p>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/12'> December 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/11'> November 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/10'> October 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/09'> September 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/08'> August 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/07'> July 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/06'> June 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/05'> May 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/04'> April 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/03'> March 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/02'> February 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/01'> January 2009 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/12'> December 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/11'> November 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/10'> October 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/09'> September 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/08'> August 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/07'> July 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/06'> June 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/05'> May 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/04'> April 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/03'> March 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/02'> February 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2008/01'> January 2008 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/12'> December 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/11'> November 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/10'> October 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/09'> September 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/08'> August 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/07'> July 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/06'> June 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/05'> May 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/04'> April 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/03'> March 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/02'> February 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2007/01'> January 2007 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/12'> December 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/11'> November 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/10'> October 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/09'> September 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/08'> August 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/07'> July 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/06'> June 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/05'> May 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/04'> April 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/03'> March 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/02'> February 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2006/01'> January 2006 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/12'> December 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/11'> November 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/10'> October 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/09'> September 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/08'> August 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/07'> July 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/06'> June 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/05'> May 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/04'> April 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/03'> March 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/02'> February 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2005/01'> January 2005 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/12'> December 2004 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/11'> November 2004 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/10'> October 2004 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/09'> September 2004 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/08'> August 2004 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/07'> July 2004 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/06'> June 2004 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/05'> May 2004 </option>
<option value='http://www.eduwonk.com/2004/04'> April 2004 </option>
</select>
</li> <li id="text-127689353" class="widget widget_text"><h2 class="widgettitle">Reviews of Eduwonk.com</h2>
<div class="textwidget"><P> 2007 Winner, Editor's Choice Best Education Blog <br>-- <em>Performancing.com</em> <P> 2006 Winner, Best K-12 Administration Blog -- "Best of the Education Blog Awards" <br>-- <em>eSchool News and Discovery Education</em> <P> 2006 Finalist, Best Education Blog <br>-- <em>Weblog Awards</em>
<P> <i>Least</i> influential of education's <i>most</i> influential information sources. <br>-- <em>Education
Week Research Center</em> <P> "unexpectedly entertaining"..."tackle[s] a potentially mindfogging subject with cutting clarity...
they're reading those mushy, brain-numbing education stories so you don't have to!" <br>-- <em>Slate's Mickey Kaus</em> <P> "a very smart blog... [if] you're trying to separate the demagogic attacks on NCLB from the serious
criticism, this is the site to read"
<br> -- <em>The New Republic's Ryan Lizza</em> <P> "everyone who's anyone reads Eduwonk" <br> -- <em>Hechinger Institute on Education and the Media's Richard Colvin</em> <P> "full of very lively short items and is always on top of the news...He gets extra points for skewering my
high school rating system" <br> -- <em>Jay Mathews, The Washington Post</em> <P>
"a daily dose of information from the education policy world, blended with a shot of attitude and a dash
of humor" <br> -- <em>Education Week</em> <P> "designed to cut through the fog and direct specialists and non-specialists alike to the center of the
liveliest and most politically relevant debates on the future of our schools" <br> -- <em>The New Dem Daily</em> <P> "peppered with smart and witty comments on the education news of the day" <br> -- <em>Education Gadfly</em>
<P> "don't hate Eduwonk cuz it's so good" <br> -- <em>Alexander Russo, This Week In Education</em> <p> "the morning's first stop for education bomb-throwers everywhere" <br> -- <em>Mike Antonucci, Intercepts</em> <p> "...the big dog on the ed policy blog-ck..." <br> -- <em>Michele McLaughlin, AFT Blog</em>
<P> "I check Eduwonk several times a day, especially since I cut back on caffeine" <br> -- <em>Joe Williams, fallen journalist, Executive Director, Democrats for Education Reform</em> <P> "...one of the few bloggers who isn't completely nuts" <br> -- <em>Mike Petrilli, Thomas B. Fordham Foundation</em> <P> "I have just three 'go to' websites: The Texas Legislature, Texas Longhorn sports, and Eduwonk" <br> -- <em>Sandy Kress, former education advisor to President Bush and former chairman, Dallas Board of
Education</em>
<P> "penetrating analysis in a lively style on a wide range of issues" <br> -- <em>Walt Gardner, champion letter-to-the-editor writer and retired teacher</em> <P> "thugs" <br> -- <em>Susan Ohanian</em></div>
</li>
<li id="recent-comments-3" class="widget widget_recent_comments"> <h2 class="widgettitle">Recent Reader Comments</h2>
<ul id="recentcomments"><li class="recentcomments"><a href='http://www.billigtflygtilllondon.com' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Jason Jagow</a> on <a href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/12/eliza-krigman-ringmaster.html/comment-page-1#comment-154202">Eliza Krigman: Ringmaster</a></li><li class="recentcomments">ateacher on <a href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/01/five-strikes-and-youre-out-plus-houston-we-have-a-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-154181">Five Strikes And You’re Out! Plus, Houston We Have A Problem…</a></li><li class="recentcomments">ateacher on <a href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/01/five-strikes-and-youre-out-plus-houston-we-have-a-problem.html/comment-page-1#comment-154178">Five Strikes And You’re Out! Plus, Houston We Have A Problem…</a></li><li class="recentcomments"><a href='http://ljohnson562@charter.net' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Linda/Retired Teacher</a> on <a href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2010/02/hogwarts-on-the-hudson.html/comment-page-1#comment-154163">Hogwarts On The Hudson?</a></li><li class="recentcomments"><a href='http://www.churchcoaching.org/' rel='external nofollow' class='url'>Coach for Awakened</a> on <a href="http://www.eduwonk.com/2009/08/reinventing-ed-school-2-coaching-dosagestyle.html/comment-page-1#comment-154107">Reinventing Ed School 2: Coaching dosage/style</a></li></ul>
border="1"><br>Collective Bargaining in Education: Negotiating Change in Today's Schools</a><br> <font color="#000000" size="-2">Edited by Jane Hannaway and Andrew J. Rotherham</font> <P>
border="1"><br>Why Newsweek's List of America's 100 Best High Schools Doesn't Make the Grade </a><br> <font color="#000000" size="-2">By Andrew J. Rotherham<br> and Sara Mead</font> </td>
border="1"><br>A Qualified Teacher<br> in Every Classroom</a><br> <font color="#000000" size="-2">Edited by Frederick M. Hess, Andrew J. Rotherham, and Kate Walsh</font> </td>
border="0"><br>Rethinking Special Education For A New Century</a><br> <font color="#000000" size="-2">Edited by Chester E. Finn, Jr., Andrew J. Rotherham & Charles R. Hokanson, Jr.</font></td>
src="http://www.eduwonk.com/graphics/EXPCutScoresCover.gif" width="120" height="147" border="0"><br>Making The Cut: How States Set Passing Scores on Standardized Tests</a><br> <font color="#000000" size="-2">By Andrew J. Rotherham</font></td></tr> <tr>
src="http://www.eduwonk.com/graphics/MeadRotherhamCover.gif" width="120" height="147" border="0"><br>Changing the Game: The Federal Role in Supporting 21st Century Educational Innovation </a><br> <font color="#000000" size="-2">By Andrew J. Rotherham and Sara Mead</font></td>
href=" http://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/store_product.asp?prodid=210"><img src="http://www.eduwonk.com/graphics/TeacherExcellenceCover.gif" width="120" height="180" border="0"><br>Achieving Teacher and Principal Excellence: A Guidebook for Donors </a><br> <font color="#000000" size="-2">By Andrew J. Rotherham</font> </td> </tr> </table> <P> <ul><li id="linkcat-5" class="linkcat"><h2>Education Blogs</h2>
<ul class='xoxo blogroll'> <li><a href="http://americanedreview.blogspot.com/2010/01/teaching-as-leadership-live.html">American Ed Review</a></li> <li><a href="http://ascd.typepad.com/blog/" target="_blank">ASCD</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.assortedstuff.com/" target="_blank">Assorted Stuff</a></li> <li><a href="http://teachingquality.typepad.com/building_the_profession/" title="Secondhand NEA smoke?" target="_blank">Barnett Berry</a></li> <li><a href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/Bridging-Differences/" title="And lemme tell you another thing about those punk reform kids today…" target="_blank">Bridging Differences (Meier and Ravitch)</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.publiccharters.org/media/blog" title="But do they like charter schools?" target="_blank">Charter Blog (NAPCS)</a></li> <li><a href="http://charterschoolpolicy.org/yes/" target="_blank">Charter School Policy Inst. Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://dormont.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Chez Dormont</a></li>
<li><a href="http://thecite.blogspot.com/" title="A blog on Course materials, Innovation, and Technology in Education">CITE Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://athenslearning.org/blog/" target="_blank">College Ready Blog (Athens Learning Group)</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.burkescarbrough.com/" target="_blank">Conversation Starters</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.coreknowledge.org/blog/" title="Bring on the classics! Panic At The Pondiscio holds forth!" target="_blank">Core Knowledge Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.erinoconnor.org/" target="_blank">Critical Mass</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.curriki.org/xwiki/bin/view/CurrikiBlog/">Curriki</a></li> <li><a href="http://d-edreckoning.blogspot.com/" title="You’d better bring evidence " target="_blank">D-EDreckoning</a></li> <li><a href="http://dcteacherchic.blogspot.com/">D.C. Teacher Chic</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.dangerouslyirrelevant.org/" target="_blank">Dangerously Irrelevant</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cobranchi.com/" title="Homie Central" target="_blank">Daryl Cobranchi</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.abcte.org/blog/" target="_blank">Dave Saba (ABCTE)</a></li> <li><a href="http://daveshearon.typepad.com/" target="_blank">Dave Shearon</a></li> <li><a href="http://dcedublog.blogspot.com/" title="Education dysfunction central" target="_blank">DC Education Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.dfer.org/posts/blog/" title="Should be as redundant as ‘Republicans for lower taxes’, but isn’t yet" target="_blank">Dems for Education Reform</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.newamerica.net/blog/early_ed_watch" title="Sara Mead tells you what it all means for little kids" target="_blank">Early Ed Watch</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.earlyedcoverage.org/" title="Colvin saves education journalism" target="_blank">Early Stories</a></li> <li><a href="http://learningmatters.tv/blog/news-desk/" title="Daily education news summaries and links" target="_blank">Ed Beat</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.ediswatching.org/" title="He’s five and he likes school choice" target="_blank">Ed is Watching</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ed-policy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Ed Policy Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/edbizbuzz/" target="_blank">Edbizbuzz</a></li> <li><a href="http://blog.centerforpubliceducation.org/?paged=2" title="The Center for Public Education Blog">EDifier</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.varpartners.net/%3fpage_id=101" target="_blank">EdReformer Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.edspresso.com/" title="Vouchers yes! Dems no!" target="_blank">Edspresso</a></li> <li><a href="http://educatedguess.org/blog/" title="The Educated Guess is a forum on education policies in California and Silicon Valley.">Educated Guess</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.educatednation.com/" target="_blank">Educated Nation</a></li> <li><a href="http://educationnext.org/blog/" title="The Ed Next empire expands to the blogosphere">Education Next Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://blog.eduflack.com" title="He wants you to look good!" target="_blank">EduFlack</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.daytondailynews.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/dayton/education/index.html" target="_blank">Get On The Bus (Dayton Daily News)</a></li> <li><a href="http://gothamschools.org/" title="24 hour-a-day coverage of the vipers’ nest that is education policy in NYC" target="_blank">Gotham Schools</a></li> <li><a href="http://blogs.greatschools.net/" target="_blank">GreatSchools Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.grumpyprofessor.com" target="_blank">Grumpy Professor</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.newamerica.net/programs/education_policy/higher_ed_watch/blog/" target="_blank">Higher Ed Watch</a></li> <li><a href="http://hipteacher.typepad.com/schoolblog/" target="_blank">Hip Teacher</a></li> <li><a href="http://ithoughtathink.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">I Thought A Think</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.learningalternatives.net/" target="_blank">IALA</a></li> <li><a href="http://mspappas.preknow.org/" target="_blank">Inside Pre-K</a></li>
<li><a href="http://insideschools.org/blog/">Inside Schools Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.eiaonline.com/intercepts/" title="Education’s union man" target="_blank">Intercepts</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.ivygateblog.com/" target="_blank">IvyGate</a></li> <li><a href="http://jaypgreene.com/" title="TV reviews, education commentary, and vouchers for everyone!" target="_blank">Jay Greene</a></li> <li><a href="http://drcookie.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Jenny D.</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.joannejacobs.com/" title="Come for the excerpts, stay for the comments!" target="_blank">Joannejacobs.com</a></li> <li><a href="http://gwu-kindlingflames.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Kindling Flames</a></li> <li><a href="http://kitchentablemath.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Kitchen Table Math</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.pbs.org/teachersource/learning.now/" target="_blank">Learning Now (PBS)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.publicschoolinsights.org/" title="The Blob Blogs! But guaranteed at least 75 percent tendentious - or your money back!">LFA – Public School Insights</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.linkeducation.org/blog" title="Education social networking" target="_blank">LinkEd</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.matthewktabor.com/" title="He’s pissed and pointed" target="_blank">Mathew K. Tabor</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.pbs.org/teachers/mediainfusion/" target="_blank">Media Infusion</a></li> <li><a href="http://stsg.wordpress.com/" title="Good luck with that!">Meeting the Turnaround Challenge Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://mikerosebooks.blogspot.com/">Mike Rose’s Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.speedofcreativity.org/" target="_blank">Moving At The Speed Of Creativity</a></li>
<li><a href="http://bgenglish.blogspot.com/index.html" target="_blank">Mr. B-G’s English Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://msfrizzle.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Ms. Frizzle</a></li> <li><a href="http://education.nationaljournal.com/" title="Eliza Krigman plays ringmaster for a three ring educircus!">National Journal's Education Blog</a></li> <li><a href="http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/NCLB-ActII/" target="_blank">NCLB Act II (Ed Week)</a></li> <li><a href="http://www.letsgetitright.org/blog/" title="Now seen mostly on milk cartons" target="_blank">NCLBlog (AFT)</a></li> <li><a href="http://schoolnerdblog.blogspot.com/" title="She’s smart, snarky, and teaching! (And she’s missed!)" target="_blank">Newoldschoolteacher</a></li> <li><a href="http://boardbuzz.nsba.org/" title="In the first place, NSBA made this blog" target="_blank">NSBA’s BoardBuzz</a></li>
This year has come and is almost gone. I was unable to complete any of my goals for the year. Something unexpected came up, and yes, it was significant enough to throw me off course. I started this year with about 50k in the bank. I am effectively broke now.
Last January, my lower back started hurting. Late in January, the pain escalated for several days, and was so extreme, that I could only lie in bed. Over the next many months, this was repeated multiple times, yet I did not seek medical help, and instead kept telling myself that it would get better, and all would be fine. Comme the end of August and my condition had deteriorated to the point that I was unable to even get out of bed and go to the bathroom.
It turns out that I have contracted Multiple Myeloma, a cancer of the plasma cells. It caused at least three separate lumbar vertebra fractures. I also managed to fracture my ribs before I went into the hospital. I was very close to dying. I have now spent 80 days straight in the hospital, and presently, it looks like I'll be discharged next Tuesday. I am ready to go home. This is the reason I've been a stranger round these here parts for a long spell now.
There is no cure for Multiple Myeloma, but it can be pushed into remission for a very long time. I am presently receiving chemotherapy, and have been exercising as hard as my body allows. The pain has at times been overwhelming. I am able to walk short distances using a walker, but must face the reality of needing a wheelchair for any significant distances for the foreseeable future. That's ok, at least I'm still kicking.
This is why I have been scarce around Slashdot, and why this year seems like it has simply gone up in smoke.
First, read my comment, now look around at the other comments.
This is what happened: * The guv'mint hands over development of this service to private parties. * Those private parties rip off the guv'mint, it's extremely wasteful. * People at a public institution (part of the guv'mint) pointed out that this could've been done way cheaper, by the guv'mint without private parties involvement.
This is what everyone says which gets modded as insightful: * The guv'mint is wasteful! * We should let private parties handle stuff instead, they're more efficient.
You have a large group of people who are so blinded by their "Capitalist" ideology that even events *directly contrary* to their thesis are interpreted as validation of it, instead. This would be like saying that the fall of the Soviet Union proved the soundness of state socialism - which even advocates of state socialism do not say! It's off the end of the crazy spectrum.
Digitimes has another reason for Windows 7 sales to be low.
PC replacement demand is not driven significantly by the consumer market, but rather enterprise and government purchases... most enterprises in Europe and North America are expected to start planning annual purchasing budgets for the year in March and April of 2010, actual replacement demand is not expected to spur until the second half of the year.
Who decided that all story submissions would be tagged with user email addresses? You might as well demand and publish people's real names.
This is a breach of trust that will drive away long standing users such as myself. Email addresses were collected under the promise of never being published. Now I have the choice of submitting things as AC, publishing my email address or just giving up. I'm leaning towards giving up. Boycott Novell has been more fun anyway.
Update 1/2/2011 Real users have been forced to buy Vista 7 with their new computers for more than a year and it's Vista all over again. They tell the story better than I can.
Here are videos that have collected at YouTube over the last year. Windows 7 is no less a pig and no more secure than Vista was, everything the Microsoft boosters say is a lie. All of these videos were made after the RTM date and most after the October 22nd, 2009 shelf date. The best have bold dates.
09/11 - buggy dual monitor action. It's funny how my PIII can correctly do this kind of thing with composting using E16 and Debian. Multitouch on Windows 7 has had a lot of high profile failure too.
10/10 - Fake AV demonstrated, shows that Windows 7 is still insecure and preyed on by all sorts. The demonstrator should have actually used virtual machine if he really needed Windows.
03/16 - Five crashes a month belies hype for this man. He wanted an improvement over Vista and 64 bit OS, but thinks Windows 7 is worse than Vista, which he also thought suckes. Wants to go Linux but has a few programs holding him back.