Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


twitter's Journal: InfoWorld Editor Joins Vista Consensus Opinion.

Journal by twitter

Somehow, I missed this late November apology from yet another IT writer, Randall Kennedy. He admits that he was too easy on Vista and advises IT users to skip the "buggy, bloated, immature OS with no tangible value add".

I went easy on Vista's performance characteristics when it first came out. ... when Service Pack 1 failed to close the performance gap I, too, wrote-off Vista for performance-critical tasks.

For the vast majority of enterprise IT shops, Vista is NOT - and likely NEVER will be - the right choice for their immediate desktop computing needs.

In 2007, PC Magazine, PC World, the Atlantic Monthly, ZDNet, the Independent, EWeek, ITWeek, Dvorak, CNet and Network World all agreed with 90% of IT managers in thinking that Vista should be avoided. ExtremeTech wrote Vista's obituary in 2008. This was followed by USA Today and Time, which called Microsoft an "empire in rapid decline". Even Dan Lyons sees, "a gloomy Vista for Microsoft."

The magnitude of Vista's mainstream press rejection is best seen in this collection. The author of MicroSplot has organized hundreds of articles by topic.

This discussion was created by twitter (104583) for Friends only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

InfoWorld Editor Joins Vista Consensus Opinion.

Comments Filter:

Be sociable. Speak to the person next to you in the unemployment line tomorrow.