Comment Re:Let's hope they learned a lesson (Score 0) 104
I think you are losing perspective of the original article. Yes, crime is bad, mmm-Kay?
"mmm-Kay"? What the fuck is that?
Pathetic.
I think you are losing perspective of the original article. Yes, crime is bad, mmm-Kay?
"mmm-Kay"? What the fuck is that?
Pathetic.
But there are distinctions made among prisoners that determine where you end up. . .
Prisoner security categories in the United Kingdom
Assuming you make it so far as prison . . .
In soft-bellied Britain, it's hard to stay in prison for long. Even getting into jail is difficult
Might be a tougher ride in the future.
You forget to disable the hyperbole filter before posting. You best be careful with that, miss. Were you to post on the wrong topic, you could find a constable at the door, and yourself up on charges.
. . . the very same words can be proof of two entirely different hate crimes. Iqbal Sacranie is a Muslim of such exemplary "moderation" he's been knighted by the Queen. The head of the Muslim Council of Britain, Sir Iqbal was interviewed on the BBC and expressed the view that homosexuality was "immoral," was "not acceptable," "spreads disease," and "damaged the very foundations of society." A gay group complained and Sir Iqbal was investigated by Scotland Yard's "community safety unit" for "hate crimes" and "homophobia." Independently but simultaneously, the magazine of GALHA (the Gay and Lesbian Humanist Association) called Islam a "barmy doctrine" growing "like a canker" and deeply "homophobic." In return, the London Race Hate Crime Forum asked Scotland Yard to investigate GALHA for "Islamophobia." Got that? If a Muslim says that Islam is opposed to homosexuality, Scotland Yard will investigate him for homophobia; but if a gay says that Islam is opposed to homosexuality, Scotland Yard will investigate him for Islamophobia. Two men say exactly the same thing and they're investigated for different hate crimes. ---- GAGGING US SOFTLY
Why, do you think there is some magic hidden in the brain and it can't be replicated using mathematics?
We will get there and very soon.
Blah blah, yeah it will be done within ten years, just like we'll all have cold fusion backpacks to fly us around.
Now they'll decree the press are terrorists and say it's illegal to do this since it prevents 'awful' monitoring.
How about 'quite good' or even 'excellent' monitoring?
Tor cloaks your requests both by encrypting the HTTP part, and by masking the DNS part. If you access it over tor at work, all anyone will know is that youre using tor.
If you lived in a genuine totalitarian state, they'd just use the fact that you used tor at all as evidence that you were an enemy of the state and torture the information out of you.
Just another example of sacrificing freedom and privacy for perceived safety (from counterfeiting, in this case). Even though this has been known about for quite a while now, it still seems just as pathetic.
No, counterfeiting is a genuine problem, not something made up to stop you from printing out child abuse images anonymously..
But no doubt you think we should not only go back to the Gold Standard, but only use actual gold pieces as currency too.
Contrary to recent reports, data broker Acxiom is not planning to give consumers access to all the information they've collected on us.
Naturally.
Hmmm.... looks like the M1 Abrams might be a proper tank after all.
Line-of-Sight Stabilization Systems
The dual-axis head mirror can be operated with either analog or digital VME control electronics.
The dual-axis system provides improved image acquisition, improved target tracking, and maintains the sight aim retinal at the sight's center of view.
The dual-axis system is available in two configurations. The larger assembly is designed for the M1 Abrams head assembly envelope. The smaller unit will fit within the M60 tank or standard M36 sight head periscope sight.
A great book on the M1 Abrams: King Of The Killing Zone
Hats off to Her Majesty's research establishment for the development of Chobham armour.
If you are complaining about HP printer drivers, I think I can just about assure you that you haven't seen the bottom of the barrel - not by a long shot.
Who are "dilitants"? Dilettante militants?
People with very dilated eyes.
Had the software been around when I used a C64 (when they were the state of the art) . .
What do you mean? C64 still is state of the art . . . for 1982.
On the other hand, a clever hack borders on being timeless - for example and inspiration if nothing else.
Certainly in a time of ever greater bloatware it can border on mind-blowing to consider what people used to do, and some still do, in handfuls or hundreds of bytes: The Puzzle
"a secure information-sharing platform called DeadDrop, built by Aaron Swartz shortly before he DroppedDead."
There is that. But also, The New Yorker is not really the first publication that comes to mind when I think of imparting secrets to a "news organization".
I mean, what would I send them? The inner secrets of socialites, dilitants, and various beat arteeests?
Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso