A Sysadmin's Worst Halloween Fears 41
Criswell writes "This weekend's Strenua Inertia Extravaganza comic strip deals with the fears of the system administrator... It's a special online 'exclusive'... Enjoy!"
Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.
The real worst fear of ANY Sysadmin on haloween... (Score:2)
Re:Lot's of moderation (Score:1)
(I've had two points randomly appear for me in the past few hours, apparently so have others)
This may explain the high amount of moderation happening right now. Either it's a burp in the system, or Rob's experimenting on us.
Re:Lot's of moderation (Score:1)
Similars (Score:1)
If you like this sort of thing (who doesn't?) I've got some more similar stuff at http://www.var.cx/pictures [www.var.cx]
/BLATANT PLUG
Re:You can take away my dash . . . (Score:3)
tar - is for stdin, so you use tar xvzf filename.tar.gz
ps aux to me, though, makes me feel like i'm sending a request to my mouse on
Re:You can take away my dash . . . (Score:2)
btw, 'ps aux' makes me feel like i'm sending it to my mouse also
it is a SysV/BSD/standards thing (Score:1)
Re:Similars (Score:1)
More Halloween comics... (Score:3)
Re:Monochrome monitor emulation? (Score:3)
I do medical imaging, so I've been used for quite a while to dealing with monochrome/color displays. While color monitors are becoming quite good if you're willing to spend the money (All the color monitors I work on have trinitron tubes), matching the pitch of a grey monochrome monitor is quite chalenging (put R,G,B channels in the space of one grey pixel).
The first time I came across this fact was in Russia, with diagnostic filmless X-ray here [inp.nsk.su]. You wouldn't want to see the difference when compared to a color normal display! Displaying the same images on a color monitor just look awful, and can be quite dangerous if you rely on the quality of the monitor for diagnostic purposes!!!!
So anyway, a few years later, here I am with my two monitors (saved from the skip). Both are 1280x1024 21" DEC monitors, there's a color one (VRT19HA) and a BW (VR21 I think) that is plugged on the green output of the color monitor (so in fact both display the same stuff).
If I program and do a lot of text stuff, I will look at the BW monitor, whereas if I do color stuff, I will look at the color one, clever hey? ;-)
Even better, with Xfree 4.0 I should now be able to get a different display on both of them (haven't tried x2x though), especially now that I managed to get myself a second matrox millennium 2, ideal for the purpose with the sync-on-green hack! When I am done, I will definitely use a true monochrome setup, because while the green channel is okay with most of the stuff, it's a little bit weird if you get color information in your xterms, sometimes you just miss some of the stuff :-)
---
Re:You can take away my dash . . . (Score:1)
Besides, it's annoying to have to recompile ps just to get rid of a stupid *NAG* field.
Re:Boring, juvenile crud. (Score:1)
Re:You can take away my dash . . . (Score:5)
Berkeley syntax (aka ps aux) doenst have a dash. SysV syntax (ps -ef) does. GNU ps does both, and it figures out what syntax you are trying to use based on whether the dash is there or not. (some flags have differing usages based on if they are berkeley or SysV)
thus ps -aux whines, and ps -ef doesnt
Some pretty funny stuff (Score:1)
Field Report: University of Arizona (Score:3)
If you look for yourself, it is indeed refreshing to have some Geek Humor in this paper, and it is something to smile about in the morning, which, I'm sorry to say, cannot be said about the other comic stips.
I was, indeed, pleased to see this article on Slashdot.
Kudos!
*Carlos: Exit Stage Right*
"Geeks, Where would you be without them?"
Whoa... (Score:1)
I thought that cartoon was so good, I sent it to my Operating Systems teacher (he always has cartoons before class, usually he alters Dilbert cartoons to make them more lame).
I think my favorites were some of the ones with the dots. ("Hey, baby...")
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
Doom to the rescue! (Score:4)
Humorous (Score:1)
This [bizland.com] is also quite humorous.
This much is much funnier... (Score:3)
Rasterman Shaves Head! [mandrake.net]
[tammy.org]
Mandrake's Seedier Life Exposed!
----------------
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein
Monochrome monitor emulation? (Score:1)
Re:Humorous (Score:1)
+"
My mistake.
Re:Humorous (Score:4)
Re:Monochrome monitor emulation? (Score:2)
You can take away my dash . . . (Score:5)
Who's idea was it to make the ps command inconsistent when it came to handling switches and complain about using it the standard way? The dash is used so often and (otherwise) consistently that it will always be "ps -ax" to me.
Re:Monochrome monitor emulation? (Score:3)
hint: there is nothing you _need_ X for. }
That comic reminds me though, does anyone know if there is an effective way of killing zombie processes? Or could we make unused signal 16 SIGZMBIE and instruct the kernel to destroy it at all costs?
"init! You have misuderstood my orders! *alt+sysrq+l* (don't try that!!)
Hear! Hear! (Score:1)
What the hell is with this "depreciation"? are you going to depreciate spaces next?
If I wanted a operating system that nags me, I'd use windows!
Re:Humorous (Score:1)
Re:Is *this* Humorous? (Score:2)
Lot's of moderation (Score:2)
Worst Fear (Score:5)
Re:Doom to the rescue! (Score:3)
Google's logo (Score:3)
Go to Google [google.com], and look twice at the logo.
Re:Hear! Hear! (Score:2)
export I_WANT_A_BROKEN_PS=t
is your friend.
You cannot kill zombies (Score:5)
You cannot kill such a zombie, since the parent might care at a later time. The kernel cannot know in advance when the parent is going to call wait and thus the only way to kill the zombie is to kill its parent. A zombie is merely the exit status of a program, waiting to be picked up. If you kill the parent, the kernel can finally be sure that the exit status is not being picked up, and both parent and child/zombie goes away.
You can, when you program, instruct the kernel to take care of any finished children by saying that you are never going to call wait. But you have to do that on a per-program basis, and in advance.
--
Re:Worst Fear (Score:1)
Re:You cannot kill zombies (Score:3)
Re:You cannot kill zombies (Score:1)
--
Boring, juvenile crud. (Score:3)
I wonder, did someone purposely set this up to make Linux advocates look like twits?