It is mail, sent electronically as a data transmission. STOP It was invented before the pitiful asshole was born. STOP Just fucking. STOP

Give him a 25 mHz 386/SX box with NetBSD. Release date is "when you crack the key to recover the data".

Why would criminals conform with laws that require them to use back-doored crypto, when they can deploy the real thing through their organizations, and leave the back-doored crap to the honest citizens? Criminals don't conform with laws (by definition!) and so they will use whatever crypto they see fit.

Ride sharing minus the Lyfts and Ubers of this world. Preferrably something decentralized with many nodes, whereby anyone can join the network.

If this "energy" measure refers to the original kinetic energy and not the impact energy, it is very disingenuous. We could likewise say that when a car pulls over from the freeway from doing 80 mp/h, to enter a truck stop, and then is involved in a minor fender-bender in the parking lot, it had the "energy of an 80 mp/h car". But, oh, science! Much of that energy was dissipated by earlier braking along the exit way, as well as panic braking just before the accident.

Your plan is working so well that you somehow still know about ISIS, and it bothers you so much that you have to convince yourself they don't exist.

Ah, but then we can supply the following counter-measure: put some good addresses into the list too!
The crackers and spammers won't know which are which.
If they use the list to perpetrate, then their IP address is immediately tagged as being malicious.
If they use the list to cull their own list of nonexistent addresses, then they inadvertently cull your good address also. So you win again.

The difference is that the code is distributed for free. No judge is going to award damages for the redistribution of something that is free. At least, not actual damages, like $$$ per infringing copy. The breach of the terms (like not redistributing the source code) could be translated to some punitive damages, perhaps. Probably the best outcomes you can hope for are: the violator of the license is either asked to stop distributing the software, or else to come into compliance: replace the GPL'ed part with a from-scratch workalike, so that the program is no longer distributed with any GPLed code, or else make the whole program GPLed.

That unfortunate statement betrays a serious misunderstanding of copyright, patents, and the nature of software.

You're paid to write the original documentation, and are voluntarily editing the Wikipedia.

This is about being paid to edit the Wikipedia.

The policy should be: if you're paid to write, get the fuck out!

I'm not going to dig through the history of every article, and follow link to the authors, to check whether it is a paid shill.

Pay me, or you don't get to extort your users with your locking scheme! :)

I just blocked LinkedIn today from being able to deliver SMTP to my mail server.

Some linked-in dickhead (link sausage? haha) thought it was a good idea to send an invite to a public mailing list that I run.

Fiberglass is actually a composite made of epoxy (or other) resin, with glass fibers embedded in it for tensile strength.

Until you have a biodegradable epoxy to go with your biodegradable cellulose cloth, there isn't any point.

I don't think fiberglass itself is used for strength in other applications, but for its fire-retardant properties (insulation wool, glass cloth). Good luck with cellulose there.

Anyone who knows their own password, and is already logged into the gun, can fire the gun, if they just speak "sudo fire", and then say their password.

Plus they can keep killing people with just "sudo fire" with no password for a configurable amount of time since the last "sudo".