Super Quick Quickies 39
Quick quickies this evening. First,
^BR wrote in to tell us that the August DaemonNews is out.
Jeff Knox noted the
Oscar MP3 Player, which looks much less pricey than other stereo type MP3 components.
Next, CowboyNeal has completed another round of Slashboxes for you to peruse. The updated list now
includes The Listology, HotHardware, linuxdev.net, BeBits, TheBeSite,
exoScience, Linux Newbie, Technocrat, MacWEEK, and Halflife.org. If
you are having account problems, or have a suggested new Slashbox, contact Neal.
Finally, some minor bug fixes: The date links in the Older Stuff boxes
were flaking out (time zone bugs). Also, replies on extended discussion pages were being lost. My plan has several more bugs on the TODO list. Please check it before contacting me.
Re:/. Requests (Score:1)
But seriously, there should be a "pending articles" section but ut should be available only to readers who fit certain requirements, and they could vote for pending stories, so that the people will get the news that they want!
slashdot newbie (Score:1)
TIA,
Tim
Oscar (Score:2)
-Laxative
Re:can we please get rid of overload mode ? (Score:1)
Slashboxes? (Score:1)
Re:/. Requests (Score:1)
As far as bonus and penalty points for length, ahouldn't posters be rewarded for being brief and penalized for going on at length?
Re:Oscar MP3 player == ugly (Score:1)
Compared to them all those thingies from Daewoo and Samsung look like 5 yr old boy's toys. Or like Windoze
However, MP3 itself lacks of quality and it seems to be even weaker than Audio CD. There's a Hi-End magazine I like very much, Stereo And Video. I have a Russian version issue that covers differences amoung contemporary DAC/ADC and compression formats. If anyone interested- drop a note and I'll try to translate it for you.
Sorry if off-topic
Re:Oscar MP3 player == ugly (Score:1)
just a thought.
Re:good idea (Score:1)
If we have a comment 1.1, the replies to it would be 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3
Replies to the reply (1.1.2 as an example) would be 1.1.2.1, 1.1.2.2, 1.1.2.3, etc.
Neato!
Re:OSCAR, MP3 copyrights. (Score:1)
The currency in question was the German (Deutsch (sp?)) Mark.
Re:Oscar (Score:1)
Re:OSCAR, MP3 copyrights. (Score:2)
As the owner of a copyrighted recording you are allowed to make copies for personal use. I'm not sure if the law states one copy or if multiple copies are allowed, but you can not presuppose that the MP3's stored in this device would be redundant, and therefore, it is not possible, from a legal standpoint, to classify this as a device designed for piracy of music.
This all falls under the definition of "fair useage"
Fair Usage also allows you to go to any library and photocopy or otherwise make facimily of any materials found therein for personal study. My father, as an english professor, regularly has his universities library photocopy entire rare books for him to take home or use at his office. These copies are perfectly legal, but often make people who don't know better cry foul.
The legal definitions of fair usage make it impossible to outlaw most devices used for piracy of copyrighted materials. This makes a lot of people very angry, but most countries are supposedly free, and there's nothing you can do about it without removing essential freedoms from the populace.
This aside, I ask you to produce a statement from any recording artist complaining about lost profits due to amateur piracy. Just one. I don't think you'll find one.
HOWTO: Changing length bonus (Score:2)
Long Comment Bonus (Assign +1 to lengthy comments):
[A text box with a number in it]
There is no explanation of the number, but I think (after playing with it for a bit) it is the length in chars a comment must be before it gets the +1. Jack it up to a really high number and noone seems to get the length bonus.
This leads me to believe that the boost in score is not 'real'. It just is a filter that is applied every time you view a page of comments.
Just what we need (Score:2)
Oscar MP3 player == ugly (Score:1)
Sorry to say it, but the Oscar MP3 Player "looks much less pricey" because it's just so plain. The front side has so much blank space, and MP3's can be manipulated in so many ways. You would think there would be at least as many buttons as on a conventional CD player. They could really use a design tweak or two.
So many switches and dials! (Score:2)
Re:OSCAR, MP3 copyrights. (Score:2)
OSCAR, MP3 copyrights. (Score:2)
The reason is that mp3 is a technology that can be used in many ways which are legal.
However, it seems to me as OSCAR streches that line.
It is made specificly to copy other artists work.
The reason is that it is devided into subdirectories as CDs.
Normally non copyrighted material does not come in CDs, rather it comes as seperate mp3 files.
This is because there is no need to sell it, thus usualy it is no contained in normal media.
(but rather on mp3s, and unsorted tape cassettes).
I think it is wrong to make such a device for the purpose of pirating copyrighter material,
which is the clear purpose of this device.
(that may be the purpose of RIO as well, but it's not "specificly designed for pirated music").
A good example is CDRs.
I agree many people put CDRs to use by burning warez and pirated things,
but many other use it for good reasons (burning debian for friends
If some CDR creator will put special warez abilities in the CDR I'm sure people will be against it,
though they use CDRs in their lives for non-warez purposes.
---
The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck,
Oscar price? (Score:1)
Um, er, how does it look not pricey? I didn't see any pricing info. The page just has a picture and a link to itself.
(Speaking of pages with links to themselves, someone should make a page that links to all pages that don't link to themselves.)
---
Have a sloppy night.
Re:So many switches and dials! (Score:1)
CY
/. Requests (Score:1)
2. Ask Slashdot never remembers who I am so I have to log in everytime I look at it.
3. More Asian and European editors - I want 24 hours of
4. A place where readers/moderators can view pending submissions and vote on them
5. Stick Roblimo in his limo and drive him off a cliff.
Modest suggestion for the plan (Score:1)
Re:OSCAR, MP3 copyrights. (Score:2)
Anyway, Just my rambling 2 cents worth.
Re:/. Requests... /. editor names (Score:1)
Small request (Score:1)
1
1.1
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.1.1
1.2.1.2
1.2.1.2.1
1.2.2
2
3
3.1
...
If it's implemented an option, then only those who elect to use this scheme would need to see the excessive numbers.
I offer this suggestion after having several experiences in threaded mode where I find myself scrolling up the screen, trying to find the parent of a comment based on distance from the left margin. Perhaps I'm missing an existing
Comments? Flames?
Less expensive? (Score:1)
On the plus side the power consumption looks small enough that the whole thing could probably be run in a car, or off bateries with little trouble.
Pretty impressive for a couple of guys doing stuff in their spare time though.
Pricing/Ordering information for Oscar (Score:2)
Re:OSCAR, MP3 copyrights. (Score:2)
1 / 1.7829 * 700 = $392.62
Re:Modest suggestion for the plan (Score:1)
Er... http://projects.is.asu.edu/m ailman/listinfo/slash-help [asu.edu] would be a good place to start if you want to even bring up Slash.
Re:Less expensive? (Score:1)
good idea (Score:1)
other than that, well, go for it
More like Quicki (Score:1)
The world must be getting pretty boring.
BTW, when someone gets their oscar, I'd like to have your observations on how well it works.
Right now, I'm a little low on DMs, and a little fearful of do-it-yourself kits.