Plans For .xxx Domain For p0rn Scrapped 361
William Robinson writes "ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) has once again scrapped the plan for a new internet "domain" .xxx for pornography. Supporters of the .xxx address suffix argued that it would have helped to protect children and others from accidental exposure to internet pornography, particularly if stronger filters were used to screen out explicit material from other internet domains. Pressure from conservative Christian groups in the US, which has a veto over the internet addressing system, led the organisation last year to put off introducing a new ".xxx" domain for pornography on the internet. That drew international complaints that the US exercised too much power over the internet and added to a European-backed movement to shift control of the online medium to an international group."
It's just as well... (Score:5, Interesting)
Nothing else to see here, move along...
Huh (Score:2, Interesting)
EU has full right to complain about us control over the domains
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
And the crystal ball says... (Score:2, Interesting)
This is exactly the sort of quote that will bite you on the ass in six years time.
Patriotism is built-in to the human psyche. Pride might well force the hand of someone like the European Union. Browsers will ask users which root system they want to use by default, and unresolved addresses are then queried against the other system.
Everyone loses.
Twomey should be focused on consolidation, not baiting the upset nations with bullish comments like this.
(and yes, the "It's our Internet, if you don't like it you can git out" are shameful. The Internet was developed for the benefit of all, and the World Wide Web sure as heck isn't American)
Re:Once again, why? (Score:2, Interesting)
It was bound to happen. (Score:5, Interesting)
for example..
Children coming into school smelling like meth, (ie parents cooking it off in the house)
Children sexually abused.. A lot
Parents that expect society to instill values and morals instead of the home.
\ Nothing but tv and games all day/night.
I could go on buts its just too damn depressing. BUt we have seen it all.
If the .xxx domain was supposed to protect children well.. nothing can be better for a child than a good sound creative, loving, and supportive home, where the parents actively are a part of the childs life..
Maybe we need a .ped domain (parental education domain)... hehe or something like it.
Ive even seen crack/coke babies with all types of physical defects, while mommie is still out on the streets.
Ive seen a so much of the crazy stuff with regards to bad parenting that i think its about 75% of the problem. The children + porn thing just comes from turning Johnny loose on the net because it shuts him up so the parents can forget about him for a while..
Thats my 2$
Mr. Foot, meet Mr. Bullet (Score:4, Interesting)
This reminds me of far-left types who demand world peace and the end to world hunger but vehemently object to the only credible means of achieving either. War isn't going away without the removal of all tinpot dictators; hunger isn't going away without pervasive globalization of all commodity production and the removal of all tinpot dictators; and Internet porn isn't going away without the marshalling of all material into a single TLD and the eradication of all human males.
Why .xxx must never be (Score:3, Interesting)
Which is why it must never be allowed to be brought into existance. Listen up a second before that inflamatory slashdot article turns this thread into today's two minute hate.
If a
Re:Once again, why? (Score:2, Interesting)
In other words, regulation should be for those who want it or need it (in the case of children), leaving everyone else the hellalone.
Re:Once again, why? (Score:3, Interesting)
(1)
(2)
There are two main groups pushing for a
And that's why I really don't think that most people actually want a
Reposted from an earlier post of mine here [slashdot.org]
.xxx a good idea, but for different reasons (Score:3, Interesting)
If we tried to force all pornographic sites to move to
However, internet porn is a very popular vector for the delivery of spyware, malware, and phishing attacks, because of its popularity and taboo nature in our society. If the company that registers
If we really wanted to make censorship easy, let's create a
An uphill battle, anyway (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually, I expect the preferred method would be much similar to the online casinos that use a .net [goldenpalace.net] for the legal-in-the-US no-money online poker, and a .com [goldenpalace.com] for the not-legal-in-the-US real-money online poker [cornell.edu].
Porn sites would probably register (or maintain) their .com address, and keep the "clean" content there — probably a "WARNING: ADULT CONTENT" page, and maybe a copy of the TOS page. The main site with the adult content would then be on a .xxx address.
As others have noted, most porn sites want those who choose to do so to be able to filter them. They also want those who DON'T chose to filter them to be able to see them unfiltered. Of course, there are some bad apples out there — the sort of "gallery" metasites that only point to other metasites, or which attempt to install various trojans. The scammers and crooks probably won't care (nor move), but the bad apples are the minority.
No, the real bane in this effort is the Religious Conservatives who don't want ANYONE to be able to see smut, regardless of the individual's age or personal preference. Which, in the present US (or globabl) political climate, isn't a complete obstacle, but is a non-trivial problem.