
Digital Camera With Wireless Browser 62
pfignaux writes: "From Steve Fox's CNET
Insider, 'The
world's first Internet-ready digital camera, a 3.34-megapixel model with
a built-in Web browser ... You can also use the camera to send and receive images,
movies, text, and voice memos via e-mail, and you can fax images directly from
the camera as soon as you've taken them.' I seem to remember something
like this in the movie, Until the End of the World, where Solveig
Dommartin sends Sam Neil a video snapshot." Well, this probably must be qualified as the first (any counterarguments?) digital still camera with a built-in browser, but the Sony Vaio GT1 looks pretty Internet ready to me;)
hrrm (Score:4)
"Fax text images..." Is that like listen to text sound? "Oh my, your voice sounds simply operatic when I listen with it through ASCII"
"User-friendly 3.5 inch touch-screen LCD" - since when has anything that small been user friendly?
"Stylus pen inputting" - mandatory election comment: Look out Palm Beachers, this camera is not for you.
"Text mode" - someone want to explain to me why a camera would have text mode? The only possible use I can see would be having it "Matrix-fied" [sic], but I doubt that is what they mean.
Oh well, nothing like reading English translations from Japanese pages, if I do so myself.
Re:Pricing (Score:1)
47.5% Slashdot Pure(52.5% Corrupt)
Until the End of the World (Score:1)
This sounds like LightSurf (Score:1)
Wired [wired.com] had a great article entitled "The Big Picture" [wired.com] on LightSurf a few months ago. I recommend reading it. (of course I recommend reading most of what runs in Wired)
Re:hrrm (Score:3)
-Chris
...More Powerful than Otto Preminger...
Re:weird (Score:1)
Small Screens (Score:2)
>neotope
Does it run... (Score:1)
Not that I'd buy one considering the pricing, however.
Re:Impractical (Score:1)
Hmm... (Score:2)
That doesn't sound like the guy though. It sure would suck if he did that interview only to have someone else read it and beat him to market!
Oh great... (Score:4)
Re:Small Screens (Score:1)
Re:Pricing (Score:2)
--
Re:Small Screens (Score:1)
I would agree that it's probably a bit early for a combination camera/browser, but I also don't think the day when all of the electronic crap people carry around can be combined into one device (without, for example, swapping springboard modules) is very far off. Certainly there are people who need to carry around a cell phone, PDA, and camera around often, doesn't it make sense to have 'em all in one? And once you've got all that, doesn't it also make sense to be able to get information to and from it anywhere in the world? Just because you're always in front of your P4/1Ghz machine with a 25" monitor doesn't mean the whole world is.
Also, when will people learn that the <pre> tag is not a toy?
Re:Wow. Nice potential (Score:1)
Coolest fixed camera! (Score:1)
A local retailer pointed me to this fixed webcam the other day:
http://www.axis.com/products/cam_2120/index.htm [axis.com]
It's motion sensitive, and has it's own webserver built in, and attaches to the network instead of a PC, either that or it can dial up a modem for you!
And the best bit is it runs on Linux!
Check out the live demo too..... seems to work pretty well in poor light conditions!
"How much truth can advertising buy?" - iNsuRge [insurge.com.au] - AK47
OT: Recursive sig (Score:1)
Wow...recursive sig. Such a simple concept, but one I have never seen. Pretty clever, really.
Oh, and since I already put an OT on this... I can reply to your question about the OS without being too annoying.
That is, if they do run Linux...
Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of these?
Can't get excited about it (Score:2)
--
Re:Small Screens (Score:1)
Re:Earlier still camera, with web SERVER, and Linu (Score:1)
Strangely, right now I am in the middle of modifying one of these for a portable wireless application (The 2100, not the 2120). I was in the middle of debugging a C cgi program for the camera when this slashdot story appeared. :)
Re:Until the End of the World (Score:1)
It went on and on for hours, yet I wasn't bored. The cinematography was astounding, and Wim managed to weave a few different story lines into one movie.
Any other good Wim Wenders movies to rent?
Why not a web server? (Score:1)
I think a web server would be more useful on a digital camera than a browser: you could take a picture and immediately share it with the entire world.
And while you're implementing this, a webcam would also be handy.
Re:Earlier still camera, with web SERVER, and Linu (Score:1)
Re:Impractical (Score:1)
I don't like digital cameras (Score:1)
Brilliant movie, a little off on the tech (Score:1)
That was interesting. (Score:1)
Other Wim Wenders rentals (Score:1)
Re:weird (Score:1)
Re:weird (Score:1)
Or I could just be wrong.
weird (Score:5)
Introducting the Sony Shoe/Lightbulb
wireless access isn't even fast enough to make the cost justifiable for this type of thing.
FluX
After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network
guess i have to wait... (Score:1)
Anyone got any mirrors of this?
The cnet article DID mention taking a picture, 'converting to HTML' and uploading to your website automatically. I wonder if it'll break it up for you ala fireworks, or just make a static ' and tags.
The part of the flash movie I saw asked 'can you create and edit at the same time?' or something to that effect - meaning edit footage as it's happening. Not sure how I'd go about that, or why. I don't normally know what edits I want to make to video until after I've got everything.
Am I just too linear in my thinking?!?!
Re:weird (Score:2)
Wasn't there a story some time ago about someone hacking Doom to run on a digital camera? Now, having a portable Doom terminal that you can hook up to a cell phone and play deathmatch while you are on the road...that might be worth it :)
Oh yeah, ObTroll: it would be cool to make a Beowolf cluster out of these! :P
---
Santa Claus: "Ho ho ho!"
Re:weird (Score:1)
it's really just a question of having the hardware for a particular application (storage for mp3's, comm device for wireless) in a small enough form to make it useful in a portable device.
just like the new samsung cell phone/mp3 player. that's a crazy combination too, but soonenough, you can have a full strength computer in your pocket and it'll be redunant to say what it does.
Or better than in your pocket, on an earring. heh, maybe we'll have supercomputer tongue rings you can keep concealed in your mouth. now that's a party. listen to your mp3's and your conversations through your teeth to your skull bone. yeah baby!
___________________________
http://www.hyperpoem.net [hyperpoem.net]
Not first I don't think... (Score:1)
Re:A bit clunky, eh? (Score:1)
Also digital cameras have advanced a ton since your friends. I recently purchased a Canon w/ a 64meg memory card and that thing is amazing. Nice little USB reader and things are down to my computer in seconds!
Re:A bit clunky, eh? (Score:1)
He never ran out of space for pictures though!
WOW (Score:2)
Re:weird (Score:1)
what will sony think of next.
FluX
After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network
no wires for my browser... (Score:4)
and, wow, I'd never have thought of stickin' a web browser in a camera - that's jsut soooo much better than using the browser built into my toster.
Huh? Totally justifiable! (Score:3)
Might take something like 128k Ricochet to upload high-res images in reasonable time, but a 640x480 jpeg at a high compression rate is small enough to send usefully at 19.2k (CDPD) or even 9.6k (GSM) rates.
-Isaac
Pricing (Score:3)
With a pricetag of $3899US, the Vaio GT1 as well as other hybrid camera-laptops are WAY out of reach for the average consumer. I could buy a p3 800 laptop and a higher quality digital video camera for the same amount of money.
The sad truth is that there is not yet a market for these hybrids except for video professionals or the ultra rich. As cool as it may be, I don't see hybrid camera/laptops gaining a foothold in the market for a while yet to come.
47.5% Slashdot Pure(52.5% Corrupt)
Re: (Score:2)
convergence (Score:2)
The reality is, not putting those things in is more like actively removing them then anything else.
Like Digital Watches.... (Score:2)
Remeber way back then when digital watches were so new and wonderful? And they start adding more and more features on it...
Who knows, any day now someone may create an all-in-one watch that is also a video camera, mp3 player, web server, phone, razor (just rub it on your face) and whatever!
Wait, didn't IBM put Linux on a watch [slashdot.org]?
"My watch has better uptime then your server!"
====
Re:doom on a camera (Score:1)
Re:Wow. Nice potential (Score:1)
I can also see this as being useful to realtors, insurance adjustors, et al. At least it saves the "download to laptop" step before "upload to home office".
If the thing has an IP stack, does it have an FTP server? That'd be cool. Plug it in to a serial port running PPP and just FTP the pictures out. No more messing around with reverse-engineering proprietary drivers.
Chelloveck
I guess I'm being a Karma Whore... (Score:1)
but it still annoys me that none of the really cool, top of the line toys come up with any support for Linux/Unix while still supporting Mac OS at the same time info here [ricoh.co.jp]. The first place I ever saw a digital camera was in a physics lab, and I know that some of the consumers of this technology are going to be high end computer users, maybe even webmasters who own Suns. Now what is the point of not supporting any Unices. The other thing is that these undeniable geek toys appeal to technophile types in high paying tech jobs...prime Unix users.
Re:Did any one see this? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:I'm a 27 year old virgin (Score:1)
Two Words: (Score:1)
Useful in certain circumstances? (Score:1)
Wouldn't this toy be useful if, say, you were on vacation and wanted to take lots of shots without buying expensive memory upgrades? If it has a modem built-in, you could dial-up your ISP (uh, from your hotel...) every night and email yourself all of the day's pictures. I realize that the pricetag of this makes it ridiculous to buy this camera instead of a regular digital camera with extra memory, but its a neat idea I think. And it will get cheaper with time.
"Welcome to Mrs. Bush, and my fellow astronauts."
Behind closed doors... (Score:1)
The Characters:
Mr. Moron: a 50 year old engineer who's an alcoholic, drug user, and generally stupid person. He feels he's about to get fired, and in a desparate attempt to salvage his job he's contacted management promising them a new product that will save their company.
Exec 1, 2, 3: typical Pointy Headed Boss
Begin
Exec 1: Ok, Mr. Moron wanted to pitch his new idea to us today. According to him, this will enable our company to grow its revenue by 300% while realizing 400% profit. Go ahead Mr. Moron...
Mr. Moron: Ah... err... ya... Ok, ummm, how about if we make a cell phone where you can, umm, maybe browse the internet on...?
Exec 2: They have that already.
Mr. Moron: Oh...did I say cell phone? I, ah, meant, ummm..., camera. Ya, camera.
[blank stares from execs]
Mr. Moron: ... digital camera ?
[blank stares from execs]
Mr. Moron: It, ah, would, um, allow us to leverage the synergies of these two paradigms while being proactive ....
Exec 1, 2, 3: Love it! Mr. Moron, you're a genious!
If it can get on the net... (Score:1)
A bit clunky, eh? (Score:1)
Hey Ma (Score:2)
Whats that, the car wont start. Here, put the camera on top of the motor and let it just sit there awhile. Okay now try it.......
Earlier still camera, with web SERVER, and Linux! (Score:2)
It is not designed to be portable, as its power supply and case are aimed at security and permanent webcam use, but you could modify it appropriately.
It's also got motion detection and inbuilt Apache.
Wow...nifty (Score:1)
Phenomenonally stupid digital convergance (Score:4)
If I'm in a friend's house I have to configure my camera to be on his network before I can make anything work. That's assuming he even has a network.
In fact, I am hard pushed to think of a way that this is more useful than having the same web-enabled functionality on my toaster ("to: root@camera Subject: toast is done").
Come on guys, I might want to hook my computer up to my hifi to play mp3s. I might want a computer in my tv to show me schedules. I only need one way to get pictures from my camera to my computer/paper, and this isn't any easier.
not_cub
Wow. Nice potential (Score:2)
I think this would end up going to end being something that every journalist will want/need. No more worrying about people confisgating your film after you take a picture that someone didn't want you to see. Just take the picture, and have it automatically upload it to a server somewhere.
Of course there's the other side of it. Trying to work security when there's someone out there with something like this.
Re:weird (Score:1)