Caldera Publically Trading 81
Fred Palmer noted that Caldera has officially begun trading their stock. The stock is currently trading several points above where they opened: congrats to everyone who got in on this one, but especially to the guys at Caldera. Now lets see what they do with it ... Linsight has a good summary if you're interested.
Re:Why anonymity on the web will die (Score:1)
embedded caldera=lineo (Score:1)
I also agree with the other posters that Redhat will be strong in embedded with their cygnus support.
I think that Caldera is probably going to focus on the 'thin' applications, taylor made solutions, and in this realm the OS is also probably less important if you can slap on a nice interface. Thats at least what I gleamed from Ransom Love's interview on CNBC today.
kfort
poor taste (Score:1)
I think its funny (Score:1)
Re:It is just me...? (Score:1)
Re:Closing price (Score:1)
To buy 100 shares of MS you would need ~$100k, which would give you a profit of $600 on a 6 dollar per share rise.
With $100k, you could instead buy ~4350 shares of CALD at $23, which would give you a profit of ~$26000 on a 6 dollar per share rise.
ANd you say there is no difference? Suuuuuuuuure. Whatever. Go learn how the stock market works.
Re:How many shares? (Score:1)
I asked for 500 and received 250.
Others had different limits and allocations.
Re:Closing price (Score:1)
Re:OOG YAWN!!! (Score:1)
Re:WOW! (Score:1)
His job is to ask questions to get info that we'd want to know... I DO want to know what Caldera is gonna do with their money...
He's merely fulfilling his charge... As far as Slashdot giving back to the community, it's not a company, Andover is. If you have a problem with Andover, contact their CEO.
AFAIK, CmdrTaco did give a bunch of HIS money to GNU/FSF...
--hunter
Re:It is just me...? (Score:1)
Re:The Next Step (Score:1)
Re:Hackers don't buy and sell stock (Score:1)
So when you say Hackers don't buy and sell stock you're wrong. Not only do I do it, but some of the most succesful stock traders I know are computer geeks.
Caldera is a real company with a real product and anyone who doesn't own any Caldera stock should buy NOW.
Re:It is just me...? (Score:1)
No, you're not alone. The funny thing is that I was considering a post with the same sentiment.
Re:Moderate parent up! (Score:1)
Re:Embeded (Score:1)
Re:OOG YAWN!!! (Score:1)
-ooky
"And Rufus is back home grow-l-in'" -bbobys
Why anonymity on the web will die (Score:1)
Crap like this slowly but surely kills slashdot more every day. Thanks!
Re:Closing price (Score:1)
Hackers don't buy and sell stock (Score:1)
Re:The Next Step (Score:1)
They should be asking themselves key questions like "How many competitors does this company have?" rather than "How many buzzwords do they have in their press-releases?".
I have no issue with Caldera (or with other people gambling their money). lastminute.com (In the UK) is a good example of people losing touch with common sense (and now losing touch with their money).
3 months too late? (Score:1)
Best thing that Caldera has done (Score:2)
My gripes with Caldera is that they do add too much proprietary stuff onto their OSes, both 3rd party and in house things. I hope they stay true to the Free Software roots of this business.
kfort
Thanks Caldera (Score:2)
Maybe going public is good for the company. Maybe it isn't. etc. But that is what any company that is going public faces. Regardless of if you think Caldera will succeed in their attempt or not or if they are worth their current valuation or not, I think that having them try is great for Linux and, if anything, makes them more accountable for adhering to the terms of the GPL, being a good community player, etc.
I am also glad that their stock didn't shoot through the roof on the first day like VA Linux did; now, even though LNUX is still at triple its offering price, many slam its stock performance as a failure, with little cause. As with all tech stocks, only time will tell what the company is really worth. In the meantime, it will trade at the whim of the market and associated spin doctors.
Re:WOW! (Score:2)
-JD
Linsight's summary misleading, what are the facts? (Score:2)
I believe it is a bit irresponsible for a "Linux stock site" to keep using the wrong title for the company especially when it was Caldera and not Caldera Systems that agreed to settle the DR-DOS suit with Microsoft for an unspecified sum.
CmdrTaco plugs in his opening the Linsight entry for Caldera Systems as a good summary. Hello? There is next to no useful (and correct) information for potential investors. Could someone kindly answer or correct answers to the following questions:
1) What percentage of the stock is available for public, how many shares are there in total and who owns those?
2) 10% of the public offering (which itself was 5% of total) was targeted to selected Open Source developers and _friends_. What was the breakdown between friends and developers (who have only seem to have gotten a number of shares closer to the low end of the 100-500 share allocation per person)?
3) Which individual owns 73% and controls everything?
4) Who got in before the IPO at $6 per share? (Sun, SCO, Citrix, Novell etc.)
5) Fiscal '99 results: $3mil revenue and $9.4mil loss.
6) Quarter ending Jan. 31.: $553,000 of revenue and a net loss of $5.5 million
7) Product portfolio: OpenLinux distro (and...?)
8) Open Source licensing status of OpenLinux (or other products)?
Every single well-informed CALD investor should be able to answer these questions so let's see if anyone's interested. What comes to Linsight, they would serve those interested in "Linux stocks" much better by also delivering important facts about covered companies instead of only scratching the surface and keeping tabs of companies' PR releases.
Re:WOW! (Score:2)
Profitability (Score:2)
Furthermore, it has %54 of the market share and unlike Caldera, refuses to write and non-open source code, as well as contributing significants amounts of its funds towards open source development [eg, a quarter of its annual expenses went of GTK development in 1998].
Re:Linsight's summary misleading, what are the fac (Score:2)
AFAIK, they sell OpenLinux 2.3, eServer 2.3 (and that one seems to be very cool, kernel tuned for server performance, hardware RAID compiled into kernel, the whole binary stuff compiled for Pentium Pro or better CPU, Webmin and much more), OpenLinux 2.3 Powerbundle and NetWare for Linux. Also, there is stuff like OpenLinux T-shirt etc. And there is a comprehensive Linux courseware which is non-distro specific, which is Good(tm).
They are also selling some OpenLnux books.
OOG is right... (Score:2)
As usual, LNUX [stockmaster.com] is down; closed at 80 today. Check the moving average [stockmaster.com] on LNUX to see the trend. RHAT [stockmaster.com] is down, too. So the CALD offering didn't do anything to pump up the other Linux stocks; it was a lousy day for both of them.
And the Caldera logo [slashdot.org] does look like Mickey Mouse(tm) overshadowing the world.
Re:The Next Step (Score:3)
This is actually not a bad thing... I'll take constant steady growth over a meteoric rise any day. But hey... I'm a long term investor and I prefer to sleep soundly at night
If Caldera had gone public 6 months ago they would have done much better, the Nasdaq has been sputtering lately and the Linux charm is starting to erode with the wall street pundits. Witness the major hit that Corel (down 20+% TODAY) and Inprise (down 20+% TODAY) are taking. As well as the downward slide of RedHat, VALinux...etc.
Now the real work begins for these companies. Stocks tend to grow based upon a companies growth and earnings etc. RedHat and VALinux will have to prove to their shareholders that their billion+ marketcap is justified. I wish them luck but I feel sorry for anybody who bought them at the top.
Closing price (Score:3)
Dave Blau
The Next Step (Score:3)
Company X provides Linux services. Company X lost between 2 and 20 million dollars last year. Yet when company X goes public, their stock soars.
Unfortunately for Caldera, they are doomed to follow the pattern of Linux companies before them, by having their stock fall to sane and earthly levels.
I'm sure that the future is bright for our favourite players in the Linux game, it just takes time. But corporate America attitudes sure do make me smile in these cases. I'm looking forward to the time when Linux companies have strong stock prices based on their corporate performance, and not the 5 magic letters that they associate themselves with.
Maybe these Linux companies should strive to see who can turn a profit first, instead of who can gobble up the most market share and start-up's
---------------------------------
It is just me...? (Score:4)
Seriously.
Embeded (Score:5)
S-
OOG YAWN!!! (Score:5)