Journal Bill Dawg's Journal: "hatrid" 7
Saw some comment of some typically intelligent and no doubt socialized education educated Leftie write "hatrid toward women". (And as typical, where none such was indicated.)
Well here's some: The bimbo[1][2] Megan Kelly on FNC, after another lady quit and filed a sexual harassment suit against the boss, came out and said she too was sexually harassed, 10 years ago.
So someone posts the following awesome comment to that story:
"So, if she continued cashing the paychecks and didn't formally press charges, does that make her a prostitute?"
I would've used "bimbo" instead, as in a woman with questionable morals.
[1] I'm not using that here to be derogative as in the sexual definition of it -- I've no idea if she fucked the fat old ugly guy or not -- but in the intelligence and wisdom one. As in "you stupid bimbo". (The equivalent for a guy might be things like "you stupid knucklehead".)
[2] There, now Lefties can say, because I attacked one woman, that "BD degrades women"!
"I attacked one woman" (Score:1)
:-) Were you mirandized before you made that confession?
I would've used "bimbo" instead, as in a woman with questionable morals.
I just checked to be sure. It doesn't appear that "bimbo" and "morals" share even the remotest relation to each other. The standard meaning, I believe, is a crude measure of intelligence. Are you once again just making up your own definitions, like with "lefty"?
Re: (Score:1)
Well you've harassed or goofed on me, whichever is the case (I don't care at all at this point), enough, I should think. Feel free to post in my journal and respond to my comments, as others may find them to suit one purpose or another for them, but I'll not be reading your stuff anymore.
Re: (Score:1)
Oh my, the Trump clown is abandoning me... What will I do? No biggie, not every response to you is just for you, but for the rest of the viewing audience as well, you know, just in case they take you seriously, dig? Good...
BTW, that entrance he made was brilliant [wordpress.com]!
Are you saying hatred doesn't exist? (Score:2)
Calling sexism hatred is a lie, I agree. But there is a lot of hatred, and it troubles me that a presidential candidate would not turn down an endorsement by David Duke and the KKK.
And yes, racial hatred goes both ways, look at Dallas and Baton Rouge. Some Christians hate gays, despite the fact that Jesus said to love everyone. Some gay atheists hate Christians.
Some Americans hate Mexicans, some hate Muslims. But the guy you referred to was dead wrong, equating sexism with hate hurts the cause of fighting r
Re: (Score:1)
and it troubles me that a presidential candidate would not turn down an endorsement by David Duke and the KKK
Firstly, "turn down"? If I announce an opinion of you, good or bad, I'm not handing you something, there's nothing for you to decline taking possession of or returning to my possession. But more substantially, if I were running for prez, I'd be fine with anyone's endorsement. For example gun control groups could endorse me, if they really want. It's a free country. And it doesn't mean I'd change my views.
Calling sexism hatred is a lie
I confused. If I murder a Black person because I have a problem with Black people. the Left says t
Re: (Score:2)
Firstly, "turn down"?
Disavow. If Charlie Manson voices his support for you and you don't disavow his support, you're implying that you agree with his world view.
But there are other "protected classes", so if I murder a woman because I have a problem with women (and what Republican doesn't, amirite?), wouldn't that also be defined as a crime'o'hate?
To my mind, any murder is a "hate crime". After all, what other reason is there to murder someone no matter who they are except you hate them and the fact that t
Re: (Score:1)
you're implying that you agree with his world view
That is absolutely laughable. So if I'm generally pro 2nd Amendment, and some skinhead voices his support for me, then if I don't march to the Left's orders and fall all over myself distancing myself from said punk, then it means I'm a white supremacist?!? That's just dumb.
Where on earth did you get your thinking that general agreement on one issue means an entire world view is shared. Hell, I agree with the Left on occasion, and I assure you, I do not share that world view. (It also doesn't mean we're