Journal FortKnox's Journal: Religion vs Science.... 9
[Someone] said Thursday the faithful should listen to what secular modern science has to offer, warning that religion risks turning into "fundamentalism" if it ignores scientific reason.
Who said it? You may be surprised.
(Actually you shouldn't be surprised, cause JP2 wrote many papers on the merging of science and religion).
Who said it? You may be surprised.
(Actually you shouldn't be surprised, cause JP2 wrote many papers on the merging of science and religion).
Not really surprised (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Not really surprised (Score:2)
Not often anymore- he DIED last April. But he lived to see us cross that risk threshhold a couple of times- and even personally chastised our current President for it.
Re:Not really surprised (Score:2)
Re:Not really surprised (Score:2)
Re:Not really surprised (Score:2)
Different Questions (Score:2)
Slightly unrelated... (Score:2)
There's a great article in the current Esquire (Jessica Biel is on the cover as the sexiest woman alive) about intelligent design.
Just a heads-up (possibly to give you an excuse for ogling Miss Biel)...
What I'm surprised (Score:2)
Still, it's Catholic doctrine that there is NO conflict between science and religion- where they appear to conflict, it's OUR interpretation of either religious or scientific revelation that is wrong. This is *completely* within Catholic thought since the Reformation- and even before. We've got an entirely different story about Galileo than the Anglicans do for that reason....