Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal FortKnox's Journal: Religion vs Science.... 9

[Someone] said Thursday the faithful should listen to what secular modern science has to offer, warning that religion risks turning into "fundamentalism" if it ignores scientific reason.

Who said it? You may be surprised.


(Actually you shouldn't be surprised, cause JP2 wrote many papers on the merging of science and religion).
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Religion vs Science....

Comments Filter:
  • The evolution-versus-creationism stuff in the US is just a pretext for class and social conflicts that are largely irrelevant to the Catholic Church, in the Vatican and even here. It's not especially about religion, and honestly, it's barely about science for most of the people on the other side.
  • I've always looked at religion and science as being concerned with different questions, and different spheres of expertise. As with anything else, they each have things from which we can learn.
  • There's a great article in the current Esquire (Jessica Biel is on the cover as the sexiest woman alive) about intelligent design.

    Just a heads-up (possibly to give you an excuse for ogling Miss Biel)...

  • Is that he said it Thursday- are science magazines channeling the dead now? :-)

    Still, it's Catholic doctrine that there is NO conflict between science and religion- where they appear to conflict, it's OUR interpretation of either religious or scientific revelation that is wrong. This is *completely* within Catholic thought since the Reformation- and even before. We've got an entirely different story about Galileo than the Anglicans do for that reason....

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...