A war is when your government tells you who the enemy is. A revolution is when you figure it out for yourself.
like Game of Thrones is 4 to 1 male to female participation
in rating game which is about as even as it gets on IMDB.
Just maybe, they're not interest in a show that has gratuitous topless women, and dragons flying around, and based purely on fantasy. That said, my wife actually likes it more than I do, but not for the same reasons.
That was rather sexist of you to assume that it was a man.
Yeah, yeah, and all stereotypes are wrong too, huh? Yes, I'm aware that "all" women don't fit this mold, and I don't have any scientific evidence to point to that indicates a specific percentage. But then, I'm only agreeing with the GP based upon my anecdotal evidence of the several thousand I've ever met, including a few that were outliers.
So, just to be clear, is this what we all want? A resource colored with only the male viewpoint? Because if it's not, then maybe something should be done. But, if all we're interested in is input from basement boys, then let's just leave it all alone, and claim victory. End of argument.
I think Slashdot ought to consider that some articles, especially those about anonymous internet trolls going open loop, might be set to not allow anonymous posting.
I totally agree that those people should only be free to say the kinds of things we believe. I can't imagine the anarchy of allowing everyone the freedom to speak their opinion, however repugnant.
(including an officer recall if the feed fails)
No, including "you are only a uniformed officer while the feed is live. If it stops, you are a regular private citizen until it's restarted".
Then it's not police brutality. It's armed citizen brutality, without all the protections of the badge.
My first computer with a hard drive was an Amiga 2000 that came with a 120MB Maxtor. I was gleeful at its blinding speed and unfathomable capacity compared to my older floppy-based system. So much so, in fact, that I spent quite a few hours brilliantly doing the AmigaDOS equivalent of cp -R
That was perhaps my first introduction to the importance of namespaces, a lesson which I carry with me unto this day.
Efforts to make the field attractive to students have largely been unsuccessful."
You would think they would know which efforts work and which don't. I'm only being a bit sarcastic with the Subject line, but seriously they should be able to figure out what does and doesn't work.
Let's put this in geek terms:
You're using "free" in the RMS sense, where the market itself is liberated. You and I agree on this. A free market is one that has been liberated from monopolists and others who want to lock it down for their own benefit.
The Koch brothers want a free-as-in-BSD market where they are free to manipulate it as they see fit without allowing others to benefit.
Which freedom is more important - that of the market or that of the actors in the market? I suppose the answer boils down to your demographic. If you're one of the billionaires who doesn't want to work for a living, you probably want the latter version so that you can run roughshod over rules meant to keep one person from screwing it up for everyone. If you are literally anyone else on the entire planet, you should probably prefer the first definition.
However, there are number of inexpensive (under $10) and free utilities that fixes the interface so that you boot to the desktop and never see it. But... most consumers wouldn't be smart enough to know this. They were forced to use the new UI.
I'm smart enough to know it, but dumb enough not to bother. I'm not an extensive UI customizer (outside of when using Linux and a tiling window manager) - you dance with the date you brought. If I'm on a Mac, I use it like a Mac because that's how all apps, settings, and utilities expect you to use it. Why fight against the current? I'll use the keyboard prefs to put the control key in the right place, but other than that, OK, today I'm a Mac user.
Same with Windows. Sure, I could install a shell that works the way I'm used to everywhere else. But that's struggling against The One True (Terrible) Way and seems futile. Worse, it means I'll only be proficient on that one particular computer, and somewhat lost when using someone else's. When in Windows, I do as the Windows does.
You can know all about the alternative interfaces and still not choose to use them. Personally, I just adopted the approach of not using Windows at all, ever, unless I absolutely have to. It's served me pretty well so far.
Nice distraction from the actual point. Yes, you are correct, but it's not relevant to what he was saying.
My story: Been using Linux and BSD heavily since the 90s. I don't really care if you spell "restart foo" as "/etc/init.d/foo restart", "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/foo.sh restart" "service foo restart", "systemctl restart foo", or just "pkill foo && foo". As an end user of the init systems, those are fungible.
As a developer of things that uses the init systems, there's a huge difference. SysV and BSD inits are close enough in functionality that if you learn one, you can pick up the other. systemd changes that totally, in ways that many of us aren't convinced are actually better. I love learning new stuff! I just changed jobs to learn new stuff! New stuff is cool... but only as long as there's a reason for it. I don't see systemd as being advantageous, at least on the server machines where I spend my days.
I'll be happy to pick up systemd if and when 1) there's no alternative short of maintaining my own private Debian fork, or 2) I can see a reason I'd want to rip out the tried and true, Unix-philosophy-conformant "do one thing and do it well" init systems we have today. As of this moment, systemd seems to do way too much. Given that it's a single point of failure for an entire host, that makes me distrustful.