This claim should be easy enough to prove if it is true. So, prove it. The state of Utah, in open court, claimed that there were zero such instances ever documented, so you have a LOT of proving to do.

(I don't care about trans people; either for or against. They are just another person to me, even if they are fucked up in the head. (please don't look inside my head))

There were redundant connections, but the people who could ride on that redundancy are not the same people who complained or were affected. Not all Spectrum subscribers were affected in the area. Odd that eh?

Then you should know the truth of his words. If you do not see it, then you are either a bully or blind to the world around you.

When you are the center of the world, you are always the good guy. Other people won't agree, but they do not matter as you are the center of the world.

Or, and hear me out, we could take the money from the people who are hoarding it. I am the first person to say, "you keep what you earn"; however, I do not feel like the people who have all of the money have earned it. I am willing to settle for courts to examine it; but, I am fully willing to just take it all and make everyone equal for a time because it is clear that there is theft going on.

1978 was the enabler for Reagan to pull his stunts. He use SS funds to pay for SDI aka Star Wars. The same group behind Reagan is the same group behind Trump.

Social Security Act Â201 (of course, ChatGPT tries to argue that it was allowed since 1930; but, if so, why did they need to pass the "new" law?)

This is all accounting tricks. The wealth is still there, it is just locked up by certain families. During the next Great Depression, we should just seize all the wealth. Many of the wealthy earned their wealth; however, they support the other wealthy that are essentially thieves, so take it all.

You and the person above you both speak some truth; however, you need to understand that the IRS was essentially a terror organization before it was neutered. The IRS would accuse you of owing or just not filing your taxes correctly and lock ALL of your money down until the matter was resolved. You would not receive paychecks, every penny in the bank lock, all credit cards, disabled, etc. That doesn't sound so bad if the person was guilty; however, without money, you could not hire a lawyer to defend yourself so by default, you were guilty regardless of the facts.

Did you not live/survive through that time?

Thank god the IRS started going after senators and shit during that time. It is the only thing that saved us.

I guess you failed to notice the recent 'elections' in the former colony known as the USA? Far worse than BREXIT.

It spends far more than that supporting the Lords and other Aristocracy. But yeah, the problem is the number of people who can't work and aren't Lords and other Aristocracy.

Technically impossible. As long as one person is literally average, then at most, slightly less than half can be below average.

(I apologize for ruining the joke, I have no social sense.)

They "need" the tax breaks to keep capital out of the hands of the masses so that the masses do not organize like they do.

(prescient CAPTCHA: impair)

The trigger warnings are fine. It means that the person viewing the content consented to it. Even if it drives up viewership, thereby spreading the content farther and wider, it is still good because a person who has willingly given consent is less likely to be traumatized. The only thing being important here is that the trigger warning is accurate and descriptive about the subject of the content.

Why is gender important here? The more of a deal you make of it, the harder it will be for such biases to be removed.

If she was smart, she earned some 'interest' on that $175m. Probably not "simple" interest, but you can do a lot with $175m without even touching the $175m.