If you want nukes it means committing to a huge industry and using it as the main game. It doesn't come in small sizes unless you can justify an utter fortune to power a spacecraft or a submarine.
As for the whole "France has more experience in terrorism", a simple Wikipedia search proves you wrong
For the knowledge of others to be useful some understanding on your part that you can link it to is required. You've just given an example of a failure in that respect and in using a metric for a purpose it was never intended for. That metric does not prove what you have written in any way.
Just accept the criticism at face value.
I'm not even going as far as you did in telling you what to do.
I'm just pointing out that others who know more than you do don't really need your very stupid suggestion and it's likely to annoy the shit out of people like me who are in no way experts so would not attempt to run down those who are - yet someone with less understanding than would be expected in the general population is having a go!
and also you claim to know more about terrorism than Wikipedia
I haven't put forward anything other than pointing you towards massive holes in your understanding of the issue - so sorry - you are not fooling anyone by trying to offload your faults onto me. Maybe you should start with wikipedia and keep going before telling people what to do instead of insulting half the fucking world in your ignorance.
I bet never more than 1/5 of the billed rate is being paid entirely to the one person doing the work requested by the customer.
There are a lot of one man bands out there.
Sorry, I can't make sense of your comment as a whole
Kind of my point. If you knew enough to understand you wouldn't have written "France and other countries will learn", but you've clearly not bothered to pay much attention to the issue you are commenting on and thus what is considered normal general knowledge seems mysterious.
"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne