You are making the assumption that they won't ban both.

Brand new? Buddhism is 600 years older than Christianity.

There will be two types of cell lines. One is extracted from living animals, and the other is extracted through butchering. The latter will provide a great deal more meat more cheaply (as these cells can only divide so many times).

So it depends on where you want to draw the line. If you don't mind taking, say, 1/1000th of the life of a cow to eat a burger every week for the rest of your life, then it is fine either way. If you don't want any part of a dead animal on your hands, then you will have to go with the more expensive extraction method.

Of course, if you don't want ANY part in any animal death, you should know that pretty much everything you use has animal parts in it somewhere. Hell, tires are black because of carbon black sourced from charred animal carcasses.

We like to think of our friends across the pond as being progressive. Sadly, this assumption becomes more and more invalid with each passing day.

Note he didn't take any property. It's more like he made copies of some files from their filing cabinet, or took a picture of the inside of their building.

The worst thing he could be charged with is the electronic equivalent of B&E. Of course, this being Slashdot, I didn't read the article, and just glanced at the summary, so I'm not sure if that is what happened or not.

Sugar+biofilm=bad idea.

Salt water is more than sufficient. No need to put acidic juices that are full of sugar up there to irritate your sinuses even more than they are already.

Hydrating, not hydrogenating. This is mucus, not vegetable oil.

Boy, aren't you a little bitch. I invite you to insult him to the face of the several hundred people who's lower limbs he has saved when other doctors said they needed to be amputated.

What the fuck is wrong with you? People who believe in evidence based medicine are not to be trusted? What are you, a fucking witch doctor?

The police and prosecutors are part of the executive branch of the government.

Also, I question the premise that any of the modern democracies are actually still "democracies". I might go on to claim that they are actually all democratic fascist regimes, likely soon to be simple fascist regimes. This is a part of that journey. You know, the purge of the intellectuals.

I'm not sure Western carbon footprint has anything to do with deforestation. We don't get our carbon from rainforests, we get it from under the ground.

You appear to have conflated two separate issues that both happen to fall under the umbrella of "environmentalism". Same situation is where some people don't know the difference between the hole in the ozone layer and global warming.