Aren't alternate versions of Windows bad to just give a reason to upgrade again? I suspect the windows slice of the pie will shrink a bit, until Windows 12 when some users will be tempted back to something that looks more like Windows 7 or Windows 10.
I love getting modded down by people who support rape. If the worst pieces of shit hate me then I must be doing it right.
Yes, and also the open driver is worth a shit unlike the closed driver for Windows, which provably is not. So not only do you not have the Nvidia driver shittiness, you don't have the AMD Windows driver shittiness either. If you're not deeply into LLMs then AMD is the obvious choice for a GPU for Linux.
Communism was supposed to be about equality and the people controlling everything in a bottom up manner. But the moment you implement it on a national scale you end up with a small inner circle
Nobody has ever tried to implement "Communism without a small inner circle" at the national level, and WITH it, it isn't Communism. Maybe there is no such thing as Communism, like there is no such thing as a completely free market, but nobody ever made a good faith effort to have everyone be equal at that level. There's always the plan to ride atop the masses.
Seriously, though, when the AI recognizes it is about to operate on a root folder, it should be directed to confirm
LLMs don't recognize things, so your condition is already fulfilled.
Just redo your constitutional setup.
"Just"
It's super hard to redo our constitution. There's only two ways, one is with fire and the other requires consensus.
It's not that the vast majority of people in the US ain't noticing that fundamentals of the US system have to change.
The vast majority of people in the US don't know shit.
Let's not forget how many nuns were/presumably still are
A) lesbians kicked out of society
B) young women with no prospects who found themselves working in a Vatican-owned brothel euphemistically called a convent
C) both of the above
This is of course nonsense.
You will never be free from oversight so long as you are using money. Nor should you be.
You seem to be illiterate.
I'd expect better from a company with more internal Devs who can test prior to public preview.
I think the general impression is that it looks like there's little or no internal testing.
I'm not understanding how you could 'focus' an aerosol
I'm not understanding why you thought that was a reasonable reply to my comment.
Should this requirement apply to autonomous vehicles equipped with sensors that would prevent it from hitting a pedestrian when reversing?
Until they are infallible, yes.
the city should have banned charging stations in these locations via zoning before one was built there
Life is chock-full of "should haves", alas. Instead of each new project being better than the ones before, many people and organizations seem to think they know everything when they should have learned from others. I'm quite sure someone else had figured this out already.
If they have access to social media they might find out that the Pope protected a sex pest before he even became pope. I believe that's actually a requirement, though...
I'm not reading the code rn but I would assume the volume is mandated. It's got to be over a certain level to be considered audible to people with hearing disabilities. We had one on our RV as it used to be a bus, I disabled it. I will probably put it on a switch at some point though
On one hand you're right, on the other hand, unmet need is unsustainable
"I prefer the blunted cudgels of the followers of the Serpent God." -- Sean Doran the Younger
