Comment: Re:Tax plan-- please explain it to me. (Score 1) 698
It's amazing how few people have actually addressed your question.
You're right to point out that many high-income (and thanks for not conflating "high-income" with "wealthy") taxpayers earn most of their income from capital gains (and interest and dividends). But Romney's plan does not propose eliminating capital gains tax for high-income individuals -- that's only for taxpayers with AGI below $200,000 (citation here). It does keep in place the lower capital gains tax rates that were part of the 2001-2003 Bush tax cuts -- the rationale being that lower rates on money earned from investment *should* lead to more investment and growth in the overall economy.
Broadening the base means things like capping or eliminating the number of deductions that people can claim on their tax returns. High-income people would pay taxes on a greater portion of their overall income. Romney has refused to commit to a specific proposal on this part, so we're left to speculate. Harvey Rosen has an interesting analysis of how it *could* be mathematically possible to "broaden the base" enough to offset the lower rates -- even with very little additional growth generated via the lower rates. In a nutshell:
- 1. Tax employer-provided health insurance as income -- could result in a lot of new tax revenue.
- 2. Tax "inside buildup" -- a type of tax-sheltered life-insurance income.
- 3. Keep the home mortgage deduction only for lower/middle-income earners. People in the top tax bracket might not get any of the usual deductions for medical expenses, charitable donations, or state and local taxes paid.
You can argue that a Romney administration would never go that far in eliminating deductions and loopholes, but that's different from "mathematically impossible". The Rosen paper puts all of this in a chart so you can compare the effects of different assumptions.
There's a pretty comprehensive round-up of people making the case that Romney plan could work here. (Yes, it's from a libertarian perspective. No, I'm not an economist or a libertarian myself.)
+ - Using lasers, researchers were able to take over the worm's brain->
Link to Original Source
Comment: Re:This is great news (Score 1) 63
+ - The ball thing in the potato field->
Link to Original Source
+ - Google found guilty of patent infringement for usi->
Link to Original Source
+ - Google Loses Bedrock Suit, All Linux May Infringe->
Link to Original Source
Bufferbloat — the Submarine That's Sinking the Net 525
from the snagged-on-the-reef-of-ram dept.
8-Year-Olds Publish Scientific Bee Study 174
from the write-of-the-bumblebee dept.
Scientists Propose One-Way Trips To Mars 839
from the thousands-would-do-it dept.
Toy Robots Can Guard Your Home 151
from the outside-is-for-suckers dept.
Typewriter Hacked To Play Zork 77
from the old-school dept.
Dying Man Shares Unseen Challenger Video 266
from the new-perspective-on-an-old-tragedy dept.
Ford's New Cars To Be Wi-Fi Hotspots 196
from the high-speed-internet dept.
Aussie Scientists Find Coconut-Carrying Octopus 205
from the concealed-carry-in-australian-waters dept.