Assuming they designed it well, the convection currents caused by the heating of the water would be sufficient to circulate the water through the reactor.

people tend to speak much more loudly than they would in a regular conversation. Additionally, if the connection is poor people tend to shout.

Now add the roar of the jet engines over that.

Sorry but that is NO different than saying "Well blacks have their own schools and drinking fountains so its cool"...uhhh NO ITS NOT, because you look into it and you find that they get royally reamed when it comes to taxes, many benefits don't apply, just like separate but equal its anything BUT.

So I'm sorry but saying "they should just have a will" is like saying "there is nothing wrong with the back of the bus" because at the end of the day you have the law treating one group as lesser worth than the others.

What support? Put a decent ROM on it and call it a day bro. I've been making nice extra Xmas money doing exactly that and the "support" consists of putting in their Gmail and showing them how to load ringtones (my personal fav is aura Ringtones as it has the sound effects most folks seem to want) and that is it. Thumbs up on dolphin BTW, I've tried over a dozen browsers and nothing beats the dolphin when it comes to android.

And while I 100% agree we shouldn't HAVE to as long as the press keeps sucking apple's dick and letting them get away with shit (not a single website pointed out killing flash helped their lock in? Really?) and the OEMs keep putting out bloated shitty Android versions what choice do we have? just stay away from AOSP and Cyanogen and you'll be fine, both of those are frankly too generic to be worth a crap. Best to do a search for your device and see who has the best ROM for that model, since Straighttalk and net10 are popular in my area its Area51 ROMs, they have flash preloaded on most along with Android Assistant and App2SD but YMMV, good luck!

How funny that it's the left

Politics 101: outside of propaganda, there is no left and there is no right. There are only tyrants, wannabe tyrants and useful idiots who think those wannabe tyrants stand for anything besides becoming the new tyrants.

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Also just because Obama is following the same play-book as Bush doesn't mean "everything" he says is a lie.

But it does mean nothing he says can be trusted, thus it should be simply ignored.

I think a much simpler explanation is that radio talk show hosts have audiences that don't care about what you think is most critical but do care about things that have direct and visible impact on their daily lives.

Or even simpler, radio hosts work for the same corporate masters who run the political show, thus they divert public attention into the irrelevancies that act as "flavouring" for each branch of the two-party system. Keep people thinking it's the current candidate that's tightening the bonds, and all will be okay if they can just switch their masters - and when they do, it takes time to undo the damage the other guys causes, and in fact things will get worse before they get better, and somehow they never do get better, and then it's time to start hoping the other guys will safe you if you just get them in power.

It is, in its own way, a brilliantly efficient way to excersize "soft" tyranny. A more competent set of masters could keep it going potentially forever; unfortunately or fortunately Corporate America lacks the ability to plan long-term, so peak oil and climate change double-teaming will likely collapse the whole house of cards. Oh well.

No, it really wouldn't. Science only concerns itself with non-supernatural/non-metaphysical claims, and there's a reason for that.

Yes, it really would. "I can read your mind" or "I can move objects with my mind" or "I can predict which side the coin lands" are testable claims, and are thus in the realm of science.

Nah, all cars tend to get bigger so they can put improvements from the previous model on the spec sheet. Until eventually the car becomes something other than the original intended design and a new smaller model car is released to fill the void that the old models of the car did. E.g., BMW 3 series -> 1 series. Compare an E30 3 series to an E92. Massive difference in size, and even the 1 series is bigger than the old E30 3 series. Same with the Toyota Corolla, Honda Civic (Jazz = bigger than the original Civic even), etc.

On surfaces without debris piling up in front of the tyre, friction is drastically reduced once the wheels lock. It's not just steering authority you lose with a locked wheel - on non-loose surfaces, the rate of deceleration is reduced as well.

Sounds like a shitty ABS setup without EBD - which even high end Mazda hatch-backs were shipping with in 2002 or previous.

vs. a good driver properly executing threshold breaking: true. vs. the average muppet in a panic situation when they look up from their phone and realise they need to emergency brake and just mash the pedal to the floor? not so much.

Depends on the surface. Once a wheel has started to slide on asphalt, the co-efficient of friction between the tyre and the road is reduced. As anyone who has done a burnout before will attest - breaking the traction and getting the wheel so spin/slide on the pavement is the hard part, keeping it spinning once traction has been broken is much easier.

Sure, snow/gravel where the is material piling up in front of the wheel may be different, but a non-locked wheel stops a car quicker than a locked wheel on good surfaces. That's not to say ABS is better than a competent driver threshold braking. But the vast majority of drivers in an emergency situation are NOT good drivers at that point in time.

Driven legally, the Carrera GT is safer than pretty much any regular car on the road.

Changing the rules and banning things does not reduce costs. It just means the money gets spent elsewhere, looking for another advantageous design or technology that hasn't been banned yet. The money WILL be spent.