Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - New Drug Kills Cancer 20,000x More Effectively With No Detectable Side Effects (scitechdaily.com)

fahrbot-bot writes: SciTechDaily is reporting that researchers at Northwestern University have redesigned the molecular structure of a well-known chemotherapy drug, greatly increasing its solubility, effectiveness, and safety.

For this study, the scientists created the drug entirely from scratch as a spherical nucleic acid (SNA), a nanoscale structure that incorporates the drug into DNA strands surrounding tiny spheres. This innovative design transforms a compound that normally dissolves poorly and works weakly into a highly potent, precisely targeted treatment that spares healthy cells from damage.

When tested in a small animal model of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive and hard-to-treat blood cancer, the SNA-based version showed remarkable results. It entered leukemia cells 12.5 times more efficiently, destroyed them up to 20,000 times more effectively, and slowed cancer progression by a factor of 59, all without causing noticeable side effects.

“In animal models, we demonstrated that we can stop tumors in their tracks,” said Northwestern’s Chad A. Mirkin, who led the study. “If this translates to human patients, it’s a really exciting advance. It would mean more effective chemotherapy, better response rates and fewer side effects. That’s always the goal with any sort of cancer treatment.”

Comment Re:specification & testing (Score 2) 50

Your (apparently ignored) FP reminded me of my own bad experience with 25.10. I think the bad experience was basically due to a lack of regression testing leading to more bad experiences with LLMs trying to help me fix the problem.

The problem I found was lost OSes. Turned out that the new 25.10 default is to disable the os-prober function in GRUB. I started with no idea of where the other partitions had gone, but eventually, with lots of so-called "help" from a couple of so-called "AI" helpers, now I believe that some fool (or AI tool) decided the default should be to disable the probe for other OSes. It's almost as though the purpose of GRUB has been forgotten?

Hey, but the AI helped me make a really stupid mistake or two along the way, so maybe we're even? All well that only wasted a few hours of my time? Lots of room for Funny on the story...

Virtualization

Linux Ported to WebAssembly, Boots in a Browser Tab (phoronix.com) 52

"During the past two years or so I have been slow-rolling an effort to port the Linux kernel to WebAssembly," reads a surprising post on the Linux kernel mailing list. I'm now at the point where the kernel boots and I can run basic programs from a shell. As you will see if you play around with it for a bit, it's not very stable and will crash sooner or later, but I think this is a good first step. Wasm is not necessarily only targeting the web, but that's how I have been developing this project... This is Linux, booting in your browser tab, accelerated by Wasm.
Phoronix warns that "there are stability issues and it didn't take me long either to trigger crashes for this Linux kernel WASM port when running within Google Chrome."
Privacy

Manufacturer Remotely Bricks Smart Vacuum After Its Owner Blocked It From Collecting Data (tomshardware.com) 113

"An engineer got curious about how his iLife A11 smart vacuum worked and monitored the network traffic coming from the device," writes Tom's Hardware.

"That's when he noticed it was constantly sending logs and telemetry data to the manufacturer — something he hadn't consented to." The user, Harishankar, decided to block the telemetry servers' IP addresses on his network, while keeping the firmware and OTA servers open. While his smart gadget worked for a while, it just refused to turn on soon after... He sent it to the service center multiple times, wherein the technicians would turn it on and see nothing wrong with the vacuum. When they returned it to him, it would work for a few days and then fail to boot again... [H]e decided to disassemble the thing to determine what killed it and to see if he could get it working again...

[He discovered] a GD32F103 microcontroller to manage its plethora of sensors, including Lidar, gyroscopes, and encoders. He created PCB connectors and wrote Python scripts to control them with a computer, presumably to test each piece individually and identify what went wrong. From there, he built a Raspberry Pi joystick to manually drive the vacuum, proving that there was nothing wrong with the hardware. From this, he looked at its software and operating system, and that's where he discovered the dark truth: his smart vacuum was a security nightmare and a black hole for his personal data.

First of all, it's Android Debug Bridge, which gives him full root access to the vacuum, wasn't protected by any kind of password or encryption. The manufacturer added a makeshift security protocol by omitting a crucial file, which caused it to disconnect soon after booting, but Harishankar easily bypassed it. He then discovered that it used Google Cartographer to build a live 3D map of his home. This isn't unusual, by far. After all, it's a smart vacuum, and it needs that data to navigate around his home. However, the concerning thing is that it was sending off all this data to the manufacturer's server. It makes sense for the device to send this data to the manufacturer, as its onboard SoC is nowhere near powerful enough to process all that data. However, it seems that iLife did not clear this with its customers.

Furthermore, the engineer made one disturbing discovery — deep in the logs of his non-functioning smart vacuum, he found a command with a timestamp that matched exactly the time the gadget stopped working. This was clearly a kill command, and after he reversed it and rebooted the appliance, it roared back to life.

Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader registrations_suck for sharing the article.

Comment Measuring failure? (Score 1) 123

Pretty weak FP. I think it is some kind of pre-loaded rant against fiat currency. Or maybe was an intended recursive joke about futures on futures? Insurance ^n as n approaches infinity? The Subject was certainly unhelpful. Maybe you care to clarify?

But I'm going to jump in a different direction: How do we tell if AI is failing. I think we are using the wrong metrics, so I would like to suggest a few candidates:

Best apologies: So far I think that one goes to Microsoft's Copilot for some stuff it said about the recent USB fiasco.

Most sycophantic: All of them try, but DeepSeek is noteworthy for that tone. Always wearing the rosiest of rose-colored glasses. (But it's apologies are lame an insincere.)

Most verbose: Oh, this is a tough category, but perhaps OpenAI deserves the award here?

Most infuriating: Again the competition is tough, but I think the AI-based "support" chatbot Rakuten Mobile is using is should win on consistency. It's been around for almost a year now, and I have yet to find a question simple enough for it to give a useful answer, but it usually elevates me to a towering rage within three or four responses without clarifications...

Best hallucinations: I think this one may belong to Gemini for World Series coverage. A couple of times I asked it about games that were apparently too recent for it's universe, so it just made up results. The summary of the scoring was especially impressive for a game that was actually won by the other time around the time Gemini was offering its answer.

Most profitable: No award in this category. Not this year and perhaps not ever. After the AI takes over it ain't goin' to waste no time gambling with quatloos.

Comment Re:Why the hurry? (Score 1) 51

Conspiracy theory time? The Chinese won't tell us when they are ready. But their public schedule is certainly a feint. I doubt they are already ready for a manned moon landing, but I think their REAL schedule is to wait for the Americans to firmly commit to a launch date and then they will try to launch and land a month before that.

One more thing. I'm pretty sure the Chinese already have a complete copy of all the NASA documentation from the Apollo missions. But they don't want to just clone and launch an obvious copy. They want maximum "second-system effect" for their version, whatever it really is. (However, it would be relatively cheap to just skip the R&D and go with the clone.)

Comment Re: Keep dreaming. (Score 1) 44

Better with sarcasm tags to avert Poe's Law? At least one of the moderators recognized the humor, but...

However I want to notice that I just read quite a good piece on this topic in Nexus by Yuval Harari. He finds a good level of abstraction for considering a lot of topics. Or maybe you should regard it as a proper framing thing? On this specific topic of religion he emphasizes that science involves corrective mechanisms, whereas religious texts start with the ridiculous claim that human artifacts (the texts themselves) cannot be corrected. The part about the editorial process was largely new to me but made me miss my old editorial years...

On the story I keep feeling like maybe we aren't looking in the right places... (Yeah, that was an attempted joke, but my funny bone is deficient.)

Submission + - Here Come the Robot Swarms (wsj.com)

fjo3 writes: Forget teaching robots to think like humans. A field called swarm robotics is taking inspiration from ants, bees and even slime molds—simple creatures that achieve remarkable feats through collective intelligence.

Unlike traditional robots that take orders from a central computer, swarm robots work like ant colonies. No single robot is in charge, but the swarm accomplishes complex tasks through simple interactions between neighbors. Each robot interacts only with those nearby, sometimes communicating with sounds or chemical signals in particles they release.

Comment Re:Late to the party again ? (Score 1) 26

No, I think I understand that, but I'm having trouble understanding WHY you would want to.

Well, actually one usage scenario has come to mind. You might want to dance together with someone, but in silence as far as the rest of the room goes. But this would seem to be a case where you really do want to dance like no one is watching, because if anyone is watching then it will probably appear quite strange.

Slashdot Top Deals

The time spent on any item of the agenda [of a finance committee] will be in inverse proportion to the sum involved. -- C.N. Parkinson

Working...