You want him out at any cost, without concern for the law or what it could do to your own cause in the end if you removed him by force rather than using the law. You have been abundantly clear on that.
You have embraced a grocery list of over a dozen different conspiracies - many of which have already been thoroughly debunked as not being anywhere near as significant as you wish them to be - of reasons why you feel that Obama should be thrown out.
I gave you a fully rational explanation that, for all I harbor precisely 0 respect for BHO, the overarching concern is to restore the rule of law
There has been little, if any, rational explanation in your aims. You want to throw out the president with the cursed fourth letter after his name, you have made that abundantly clear. You just don't have a reasonable way to do that in accordance with the law.
Smitty, I and many others would absolutely love to see you present a rational defense for your goals. We know, of course, that you do not have one.
You can characterize behavior as cowardly, e.g. letting me under fire die
You cannot prove such a behavior to be cowardly, particularly from thousands of miles away. Sure you can retreat when on the battlefield - and apparently you would embrace the Soviet ideal of shooting retreating soldiers when they are fleeing - but you cannot show actions from a great distance to be cowardly. From a great distance you are talking about feelings and you cannot prove feelings.
It has been investigated and reported on more than once.
By what unpartisan source, pray?
We have gone over this. You have deliberately chosen not to read the reports. More so, you cannot possibly make an argument for your aspirations seeking an "unpartisan" investigation, when you clearly want an investigation that comes back calling for the immediate forcible sans trial removal of the POTUS.