Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - E-Reader manufacturers seek waiver from disabilities act->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Amazon, Kobo, and Sony filed filed a petition (PDF) seeking a waiver for their e-reading devices (such as the Amazon Kindle, the Kobo Glo, and the Sony Reader) from the Federal Communications Commission's recently adopted rules that would impose certain disabilities act requirements on providers of advanced communications services (ACS). The petition notes that while communications may be integrated into e-reading devices, it is not the primary purpose of these devices ("designed and optimized for reading digital written work"), and that "the theoretical ACS ability of ereaders is irrelevant to how the overwhelming majority of users actually use the devices.""
Link to Original Source

+ - 9-digit numbers copyrighted and DMCA notice issued-> 2

Submitted by Taco Cowboy
Taco Cowboy (5327) writes "The American Bankers Association claims that it has copyrighted 9-digit numbers

An individual whose website is offering a searchable list of American banks' routing numbers receives a DMCA notice from the American Bankers' Association, claiming copyright in those numbers

Greg Thatcher runs a website that provides a variety of information and services. One of those is, or was, an alphabetized list of the routing numbers associated with American banks. If you've ever had to make a wire transfer, or set up on-line payments from your bank account, you've used one of these numbers, each of which is unique to a particular bank. It's the other long number on your checks that isn't your account number

Thatcher got these routing numbers from a federal government website , as in fact anyone still can. He first began providing them on his website in 2005

Given that the numbers are available from the Federal Reserve, it was therefore to Thatcher's great surprise when he received this DMCA notice

Sent by a law firm representing the American Bankers Association, ("ABA") the letter requested that Thatcher remove the numbers from his website because they were violating the copyright in those numbers held by the ABA

A search of the U.S. Copyright Office records reveals that the ABA does indeed have a registered copyright in what is described as the key to the routing numbers, with the most recent entry at 2012 ( http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=57&ti=51,57&Search_Arg=routing%20numbers&Search_Code=FT*&CNT=25&PID=ps_HRgBR2Rg-OnuCuOTD6EM6T2_i&SEQ=20130627164332 )

More information at https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130621/13594123566/american-bankers-association-claims-routing-numbers-are-copyrighted.shtml"
Link to Original Source

+ - Australian Bureau of Statistics doesn't like direct downloads of census data->

Submitted by Bismillah
Bismillah (993337) writes "The ABS has released the census data for the country under a Creative Commons license, but instead of making it easy to get, they've put in Javascript to obfuscate file paths and more. http://www.itnews.com.au/News/339819,abs-hobbles-census-data-downloaders.aspx All commented in the source code of course."
Link to Original Source

+ - FAA draft environmental impact report finds no impediment for Texas space port->

Submitted by MarkWhittington
MarkWhittington (1084047) writes "According to an April 15, 2013 story in the Brownsville Herald, the FAA has released a draft version of its environmental impact statement for the proposed SpaceX space port to be built near the city in the southern part of Texas. The FAA found that while there were a number of potential concerns, there was nothing that would cause SpaceX to be denied a permit to build the space port."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:If you wanted to know about humans, (Score 2) 450

by reasterling (#43008827) Attached to: We Aren't the World: Why Americans Make Bad Study Subjects
I agree with you, there are a lot of people in America who can not afford health care, and thus do not make use of the system. However, the problem with healthcare cost is directly perportonal to our governments involvment. Our social forms of insurance (medicaid and medicare) are right at the top of the list for reasons that our health care is not affordable. The Government set the "cost" of a procedure at a level were almost no profit can be made, and then only pay on average half of that "cost". The net result is that health care providers have to charge everyone else extreme prices just to stay in business. To sum it up our governments current involvment in our health care system IS the problem, and increaseing their involvement will only make things worse. Private insurance is just as bad as the governments insurance programs. Private insurance companies (at least in the US) exist to maximize their profits. That means that their primary function in our health care system is to be a leach that draws cash out of the patient care environment. It is therefore most ironic (moronic) that the latest batch of legislation aimed at fixing our healthcare system mandates that everyone must get insurance. They could have passed a law that mandated paying your medical bills and at least the health care provider would see the money, but instead Obama, in his great wisdom, mandated an increase to our problems.

Comment: Re:If you wanted to know about humans, (Score 1) 450

by reasterling (#43007591) Attached to: We Aren't the World: Why Americans Make Bad Study Subjects
I did not intend to say that the government directly tells the Dr what to do. Rather, by vertue of saying 'we only have so much money' they in effect dictate the quality of the health care that is available.

This is seen in the Patients to Dr ratio as compared between Canada and the US.
Canada - 470:1
US - 390:1
But, even if your system in Canada is better, by some metric of measuring health care, I still do not want our inept federal government messing up what health care we do have.

Comment: Re:If you wanted to know about humans, (Score 1) 450

by reasterling (#43007179) Attached to: We Aren't the World: Why Americans Make Bad Study Subjects
For many of us Americans, The debate over health care is not about quality or availability, but rather it is about who has the power to control quality and availablility of our health care. Socialized health care gives the government the power (through cash flow) to prescribe what our health care should be like. Given our current negative cash flow in the federal budgets I am not very optimistic about what health care will be like if we were to socialize that part of our society.

Our roads and schools receive most of their funding from state and local taxes. To sugest that this is an example of what Federal socialized health care would be like is very misleading.

Comment: Re:It's a good start, but... (Score 3, Informative) 176

by reasterling (#42907077) Attached to: IE Standardization Fading Fast
I do not know if the grandparent post was refering to insecurity from the clients point of view or the servers. However, if the website depends on js for input validation then the website is fundamentaly insecure. If we are looking at security from the users perspective then I am mindfull of cross site scripting, an attack method that is #2 on the OWASP top 10 list. JS can be done correctly but the user has to trust not only the site they are visiting, but also every advertizement or other object that the page has requested from some outside source. As a web developer I know, as I think you do, that js can be made safe. You are technicaly correct that js is just a language. But, I suspect that even you realize that simply trusting all js that is loaded into your browser is inherently insecure.

What ever you want is going to cost a little more than it is worth. -- The Second Law Of Thermodynamics

Working...