"No idea what you're talking about."
That has been obvious for a while now.
"I simply respond to bits of your comments in ways that I feel appropriate."
And that has, too.
"??? You're the one defending laws that restrict people ... You provided "evidence," but not good evidence. Evidence can be just about anything, but it isn't the same as proof."
Again you're trying to make pseudo-logical arguments but failing. It isn't possible to "prove" a negative.
"... and making outrageous claims."
You don't seem to get the point that you are in a very small minority of people who think so. The vast majority of other people don't think so at all. No, that's not a "logical argument", nor is it "proof", but it should give you cause to examine your assumptions very closely... which my guess is you haven't done. It's only a guess, but I have reasons for it.
"Evidence can be just about anything, but it isn't the same as proof."
No shit, Sherlock. Your point is?
"given the historical evidence."
"There you go again. This is just something you want to believe. It's almost as if you've heard it so many times that you've been brainwashed by the propaganda."
No. If you're trying to make a logical argument, you're failing. I've presented evidence. You might disagree with that evidence but you haven't presented a single reason for thinking it's false, even a little, in any way. All you've done is make bald assertions that "you are wrong" and "it's all in your mind" and "you are brainwashed."
These are the arguments of an ideologue, not a person who wants to have a genuinely logical argument or discussion.