who do you think invented date rape drugs?
This comment isn't a troll. Claiming the area covered is bigger but the volume is much much lower needs a citation. All I've been able to find are "theories" on why the ice is growing in Antarctica.
How does the directive to "save who you can" allow it to decide which potential target to save?
But 3 consecutive years of expansion would be....
Arctic sea ice is rebounding too. So Antarctic sea ice is at record levels, and Arctic sea ice has moved well away from it's record low, FYI.
That's not moving goalposts. If you ask for the data, you expect you'll get the original recordings, not a bunch of values that have been adjusted arbitrarily at someone's whim without an explanation of those adjustments and a means of extracting the original values.
Really? Every time it rains in Washington, DC 4 Billion liters of inexpensive, clean water that doesn't require large amounts of energy to process falls.
ocean water evaporates, clouds form, rain falls down. As long as this cycle continues, fresh water will continue to renew. F'ing know nothing moron....
Can you cite an earthquake caused by fracking that actually caused any damage? Poor water quality existed long before fracking. There are plenty of inexpensive solutions to ensure water quality isn't an issue.
Really? So a scientist postulates a new theory, devises an experiment to test the theory, performs the experiment, and notes the results match the theory. He did this all on his own, without any help. His experiment is repeatable, and it's verifiable. But he hasn't shared the results with anyone yet, so there is no consensus. So what you're claiming is this scenario is impossible?
newsflash: fresh water is an infinitely renewable resource. The problem isn't a lack of fresh water, the problem is surplus population in regions prone to natural drought cycles. With proper water reserve infrastructure, development, and management, these regions could easily eliminate water shortages.
It's been happening for 60 years now, and there have been zero deaths, and zero environmental disasters. Safer than nuclear, safer than coal, safer than wind turbines. Just because you used an expletive for emphasis in your closing sentence, doesn't mean you're right.
I'd say you're an idiot. Crichton is right. One scientist with a repeatable, verifiable experiment can prove many many many scientists who happen to think they're right, wrong. Consensus shouldn't have any place in science.
He probably plagiarized it anyway