... when things go dramatically wrong. There is no way Apple is unable to make an LLM on the level of most other players at this time.

Indeed, it does. Excellent.

Nope. But people like you have been proven to be of massive negative worth.

You make a rational and convincing argument. Unfortunately the person you answer to is not rational. They just want to find _something_ so that they can blame somebody else and continue to not change anything about their own life. These people are a core part of the problem.

So? Does that make climate change disappear or be less of a catastrophe? No, it does not. Seriously, how stupid are you?

Ah, yes, speak truth, get modded troll. No idea how some fuckups get mod-points time and again.

You were just moving the goalposts. Which is a scummy and fundamentally dishonest thing to do. Want to add a bit of whataboutism to that or maybe some bikeshedding?

Quite true. And many of those easy to manipulate mistakenly think they are hard or impossible to manipulate. Makes them excellent victims.

Also refer to https://slashdot.org/story/25/...

Indeed. Also refer to https://slashdot.org/story/25/...

First, by current Physics, thermal noise is deterministic. And second, it makes a difference for the mechanism of the proof. Hence your argument is nonsense.
And as a side-note, nobody actually knows whether putting in true randomness (by currently known Physics reserved for quantum effects) would make a difference or not. My proof would certainly not work for that scenario though.

Nope. I guess you lack experience with proof theory or are not smart enoug to see what the claim actually is.

No. It is a proof. It leaves open what the meachanism is and for sure there is none in currently known Physics. The one doing "mysticism" here is you by ascribing properties to known mechanisms which they do not have.

That is called "moving the goalposts" and it is essentially dishonesty.

Naa, you are just as bereft of insight and an the same idiot as always. Proof: I never, ever claimed LLMs cannot do anything. Prove your claim and find a statement by me that says different.

There is actually a relatively simple proof for that: LLMs are fully deterministic. Yes, many do include "randomization", but that is by PRNG and does only add the appearance of non-determinism. Hence there is no mechanism for consciousness. Because consciousness can influence physical reality (we talk about it) even though it is completely unclear as to how that happens. But a deterministic computation always behaves the same, there is no outside influence. Hence it cannot have consciousness.

I do realize that understanding this proof probably requires some ability to think idependently. Most people do not have that.

Nope, there is not. There are fake claims to that effect, but they are only claims. They have no scientifically sound basis and they are generally easily identifiable as misinterpretation of the data.

People that make "silly memopry use errors" are incompetent. They remain incompetent when using other languages. Of how do you think all those PHP or JavaScript security problems come into being?