Comment: Re:Hemos Says: "So Long, and Thanks For All The Fi (Score 1) 1521
From yet another schmuck who has been through almost his entire youth with /. at his side, thanks for all those years CmdrTaco, and bon voyage.
Twitter Bug Lets Users Force Others To Follow Them 143
Posted
by
Soulskill
from the take-that-conan dept.
from the take-that-conan dept.
Several readers have sent word of a Twitter bug which has been allowing users to make any other user follow them by simply tweeting "accept [username]." People have been abusing it to make the accounts of various celebrities and publications follow them. Twitter acknowledged the bug and disabled the follow/unfollow system until they can get it fixed.
Comment: Re:Is StarCraft the right game to use for this? (Score 1) 200
Congrats. Your comment made it to teamliquid's post on this competition
EDIT: The competition's also been slashdotted, where it's being discussed by various people who don't know too much:
Perhaps a game not so dominated by rushing tactics would be a better choice of base game? It definitely seems an interesting idea, but there must be games better suited to an AI contest like this...
lol.
Comment: Re:Lack of options. (Score 1) 496
Chrome incognito for pr0n. Firefox for everything else.
New game from DOTA creators enters public beta.->
Submitted
by
GunpowderTreason
GunpowderTreason writes "Steve "Guinsoo" Feak, the creator of DOTA Allstars, has combined wits with several other individuals key to the development of DOTA to create a spiritual successor to the game. The new game League of Legends has entered its public beta and aims to offer more customization over heroes and new tactics while preserving much of the original DOTA feel and gameplay such as pushing, creeping, and tower killing. The game is said to be free upon release and will have unlockable content or a collectors edition will be available for purchase with all unlockable content already available. Despite being a free game the design team says they plan to update the game regularly."
Link to Original Source
Link to Original Source
Thou shall not infringe my 10 patents-> 3
Submitted
by
Tasha26
Tasha26 writes "So it's been in the news and on Slashdot that Apple's iphone allegedly infringes 10 of Nokia's patent. Since that number was so precise, I did some digging up within the official complaint and here's the list of infringements:
1. Patent 5,802,465: Data transmission in a radio telephone network.
2. Patent 5,862,178: Method and apparatus for speech transmission in a mobile communications system.
3. Patent 5,946,651: Speech synthesizer employing post-processing for enhancing the quality of the synthesized speech.
4. Patent 6,359,904: Data transfer in a mobile telephone network.
5. Patent 6,694,135: Measurement report transmission in a telecommunications system.
6. Patent 6,775,548: Access channel for reduced access delay in a telecommunications system.
7. Patent 6,882,727: Method of ciphering data transmission in a radio system.
8. Patent 7,009,940: Integrity check in a communication system.
9. Patent 7,092,672: Reporting cell measurement results in a cellular communication system.
10. Patent 7,403,621: System for ensuring encrypted communication after handover
Gee, I guess those folks at Nokia are really feeling the profit squeeze resulting from customers shifting to iPhones and Blackberries, and the recession on top of it!"
Link to Original Source
1. Patent 5,802,465: Data transmission in a radio telephone network.
2. Patent 5,862,178: Method and apparatus for speech transmission in a mobile communications system.
3. Patent 5,946,651: Speech synthesizer employing post-processing for enhancing the quality of the synthesized speech.
4. Patent 6,359,904: Data transfer in a mobile telephone network.
5. Patent 6,694,135: Measurement report transmission in a telecommunications system.
6. Patent 6,775,548: Access channel for reduced access delay in a telecommunications system.
7. Patent 6,882,727: Method of ciphering data transmission in a radio system.
8. Patent 7,009,940: Integrity check in a communication system.
9. Patent 7,092,672: Reporting cell measurement results in a cellular communication system.
10. Patent 7,403,621: System for ensuring encrypted communication after handover
Gee, I guess those folks at Nokia are really feeling the profit squeeze resulting from customers shifting to iPhones and Blackberries, and the recession on top of it!"
Link to Original Source
Comment: Re:Huh? (Score 2, Insightful) 316
I am both sad and happy that I have no idea wtf you are talking about.
Comment: Re:Can't code without them (Score 2, Funny) 303
Not a bad sentence but you are missing a full stop/period at the end.
Comment: Re:Never... (Score 1) 303
Maybe you assume that he assumed that slash.. oh screw this.
SPAM: Facebook under fire over privacy settings
Submitted
by
ZeeNews
ZeeNews writes "The latest news for all social media lovers is that the Popular social networking site Facebook is being criticised for planned changes to its privacy settings.
The Facebook officials plan to "simplify" the process so users only have to set them once, instead of for each individual feature.
The change will help people share more information with one another.
However, critics insist that the new settings can persuade members to share too many personal details — their date of birth for example.
"I'm a little bit worried about the settings recommended by Facebook because as far as I can see it's actually sharing quite a lot of information with quite a few people," the BBC quoted Tom Royal, from Computeractive magazine as saying.
"That's not something we'd advise people to do. We'd very much recommend people choose the ''limited'' option instead.
"For example, just your date of birth can be a security question for lots of internet applications," he added.
Meanwhile, Facebook execs say that the ''one size fits all'' approach will make things more straightforward for users.
"The effect of more and more settings has made controlling privacy on Facebook too complicated," said site's chief privacy officer Chris Kelly.
"It's also phasing out regional networks like London and Manchester because Kelly says "they don't adequately reflect a world where people choose the audience they want to share with," he added."
Link to Original Source
The Facebook officials plan to "simplify" the process so users only have to set them once, instead of for each individual feature.
The change will help people share more information with one another.
However, critics insist that the new settings can persuade members to share too many personal details — their date of birth for example.
"I'm a little bit worried about the settings recommended by Facebook because as far as I can see it's actually sharing quite a lot of information with quite a few people," the BBC quoted Tom Royal, from Computeractive magazine as saying.
"That's not something we'd advise people to do. We'd very much recommend people choose the ''limited'' option instead.
"For example, just your date of birth can be a security question for lots of internet applications," he added.
Meanwhile, Facebook execs say that the ''one size fits all'' approach will make things more straightforward for users.
"The effect of more and more settings has made controlling privacy on Facebook too complicated," said site's chief privacy officer Chris Kelly.
"It's also phasing out regional networks like London and Manchester because Kelly says "they don't adequately reflect a world where people choose the audience they want to share with," he added."
Link to Original Source