Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not for long they don't (Score 1) 183

To be fair your link does say "designed to bypass internet filtering mechanisms or content restrictions", so it sounds like SSH, work VPNs, banking etc. don't count because they aren't designed to get around the porn filters.

It still seems pointless because most of the VPN services are based outside the US for legal reasons anyway.

Comment Re:If only they didn't burn so much fossil fuels (Score 1) 81

I didn't say you're a communist.
I didn't say you're a coastal elite or any of that other straw man bullshit you put in my mouth.

Can't be a straw man, I was making no argument to tear down.
Also, it's time for some rudimentary English education.
"I'm what you dipshits call..." does not imply you personally called me anything. Please tell me you understood that and were just being lazy.
That aside, nobody here is blind to how you paint "Democrats" and "the left", so your dodge isn't even just lazy, it's also intellectually dishonest.

You're a Democrat.

A Democrat is a member of the Democratic party, or at the very least a voter who identifies as such.
Ergo, I am not.

Have you ever voted for a Republican?

Indeed I have. Not since 2012, I'll grant you.

How many not-Democrats have you EVER voted for at ANY level?

Many, particularly at local levels.
These days, they're all MAGA morons unfortunately, so I'm still waiting for you people who live in a fever dream of constantly fellating Trump while a stoma supplies you with a constant supply of air so that you don't ever have to stop to fucking fade back into their trailers.

Your inability to understand basic English and resort to ad hominem and strawman is because you're a Democrat and a moron. But now I'm being redundant.

God, yet another day, yet another misuse of the term ad hominem.
It's so ridiculous. Certainly one amongst you has some fucking formal education, no?
Unless I used the insult as a tu quoque argument, it's just a fucking insult, shit-for-brains. Trying to dress it up in big words doesn't alter its nature.

You are a Democrat.

Except not, lol.
Though I suppose in the universe you live in where you're either sucking Trump's cock or a big-D Democrat- then sure, I guess I am.

Comment Re:The YouTuber Adam Something (Score 1) 38

China is building a maglev line between Beijing and Shanghai, which will then extend south. Given how fast they build conventional high speed rail, I expect that expansion will be rapid.

It's an interesting design too, and a largely domestic one. They do have a German built maglev in Shanghai, but the new EMUs they have been showing off bare little resemblance beyond using electromagnetic suspension. I'm looking forward to comparing it to Japan's electrodynamic suspension.

Comment Re:Don't blame the pilot prematurely (Score 1) 53

The switches moved before the conversation between the pilot and copilot took place.

Your proposed sequence of events:
Engines shut off.
Pilot flips fuel switches to cutoff.
Copilot asks pilot if he cut the engines.
Pilot says they didn't.
Someone then flips the fuel switches back to run.

Makes a whole lot of fucking sense. No, seriously. I bet you're the best fry cook in town.

Comment Re:President Trump ... (Score 1) 259

You've just moved the goalposts.

You said:
[So you're saying America elected] [one of the worst leaders of all time anywhere.]

That dumbshit isn't anywhere close to one of the worst leaders of all time anywhere. That is, again, one of the dumbest fucking things I have ever read.
When he's got a few million dead under his belt, we can begin to talk about his ranking under the "worst" category of "of all time anywhere".

If you'd like to limit that to say, "American Presidents", then alright- we can play ball with that.
Quit being a fucking moron.

Comment Re:If only they didn't burn so much fossil fuels (Score 1) 81

Just did, from what I've read, MWP 1a took around 500 years to happen, 1b took even more. Not as fast as what's happening nowadays, nature had more time to adapt.

Sealevel rise (per year) during the MWPs was an actual (correctly used) order of magnitude higher than today. So scale-wise, it was far more significant. Speed-wise, the level of change was much more rapid.

But I'd not even compare both events to the global temperature rising which is currently happening, they're different phenomena. Global temperature rise is more troubling, and this rhythm is, AFAIK, unprecedented.

Correct. Today's problem is a different kind, and one that is far more dangerous the extant ecosystem.

This is one of the ways that "Climate Change" fucks as a description. "Global Warming" really was always better.
The problem isn't that the climate is changing. Life works around that. The real danger is that it's warming- that it's trying to adapt to a warmer and warmer world. There will be no equilibrium until it stops, and the world will get less and less habitable to us.

Comment Re:If only they didn't burn so much fossil fuels (Score 1) 81

I'm not a Democrat. I said some of their values align with mine.
I've been an independent my entire life. I am, however, a liberal.

I'm what you dipshits call one of the "Coastal Elites".
People with a substantial income and net worth that are somehow also communists (weird).

Your inability to see any nuance in positions is because you're a stupid person. It's ok. Your time in the sun is almost over, now. It'll be a while before America empowers morons again.

Comment Re: Human (Score 1) 53

Or, perhaps, just make the process take more time, so that a copilot 1) can easily see that it's happening, 2) put a stop to it
You need to be able to shut off the engines with 1 single pilot, but you don't want 1 pilot to do it if another pilot countermands them (i guess there's a weakness too, but less of one)

I do feel like we can do better, but I don't feel like there's any way to make it perfectly safe. At the end of the day- the guy is piloting the plane- there are a near infinite ways he can crash it.
But we want the redundant pilots to be able to prevent that from happening, if possible.

Comment Re:Don't blame the pilot prematurely (Score 1) 53

Captain Steeeve is a fucking dipshit who promulgated flat out misinformation for views.

Engines shut down. That's why data streams are evaluated for why.
This shutdown was manual- accidental or otherwise.

All of the conspiracy theorizing about ways the engines both could have shut off are all based on ignoring one fundamental fact- that the switches were were moved to cutoff.

Comment Re:Don't blame the pilot prematurely (Score 1) 53

Indisputable is too strong of a word, yes.

But disputed is as well.
We're currently in the throw-spaghetti-at-the-wall phase of coping with what happened.
Some people are very personally invested in that pilot not having cratered that plane.

The disputes become less credible every passing day, and their credibility was strained to begin with.

Comment Re:Don't blame the pilot prematurely (Score 1) 53

Complete bullshit.

The engines were turned back on- by the copilot- to save the craft.
The engines did not shut down due to an interruption in throttle control- it was recorded as going to off.
Both Geoffrey Thomas and Richard Godfrey have been consistently wrong, to the point where I no longer watch any pilots on YouTube, since listening to how wrong they end up being is starting to erode my trust in their ability to pilot aircraft.

Slashdot Top Deals

If mathematically you end up with the wrong answer, try multiplying by the page number.

Working...