So is your brain. Inherently. That was the point.

Ah, yes. Can't do that with a human.

I was actually referring to your brain.

lol. Do you feel that your brain has a logic engine that doesn't sit upon a purely probabilistic circuit?

Absolutely. Logic exists outside of everything.
Human logic does not exist outside of its neurons. To claim otherwise is dualist absurdity.

Indeed they are. In order to make that claim have anything whatsoever to do with anything, you'll have to pivot to your mind also being independent of human existence.

Imperfections? The system they implement is purely stochastic. If it had been beneficial to compute differently, they'd have evolved a more resilient neuron.

Good- then you agree that handwaving logic performed by an LLM as "applying statistical probability" is dumb.

What in the fuck are you talking about? Iran has successfully demonstrated that they can exercise control over the strait at-will.

What is up with your apologism?

A ship that wishes to transit requires the consent of Iran, or Iran will attack that ship.
It's not like there's a fucking stoplight there, dude.

No, it absolutely has not, and cannot.

This is correct.

No, ships are still following the rules set by Iran, because the US Navy cannot reasonably protect them from ballistic missiles and drones.

Completely wrong.

Iran will continue to control the strait until it is disarmed, out of ammunition, or peace is achieved. That much has been made perfectly clear throughout the course of this conflict.

There was a rational question, not an argument.

However, while I fully endorse the use of expletives as much as possible, in this case however, the substance-less insults outweighed the question by 4:1. That's more than enough to make any rational person question if there's any reason to look for a coherent thought there. Do better.

Tesla's own stats, which I don't believe for a second.

And those stats are for managed "Full Self Driving", where a human has to monitor it all the time. Competitors have had actual self driving cars where there is no full time human monitoring, for years.

Have you considered hiring someone on a contract basis to maintain ufraw? If you depend on it, surely it's worth investing in.

My experience with Debian is similar. Much less broken stuff than Ubuntu or Mint. But also the usual problems with things changing in breaking ways between versions, which makes instructions on how to do things outdated within a year or two, 3rd party software stops building and so on... Like you, I have VMs with obsolete versions of Debian and Ubuntu, just to keep certain bits of software working. Meanwhile on Windows I can still install a version of MPLAB from the 90s to build some old firmware.

Out of interest, how do you discover the IPv6 addresses of your IoT devices, so you can connect to them?

I looked into IPv6 for home use a while back, and basic stuff like adding new devices to the network and finding them is a bit of a nightmare.

On IPv4 with DHCP it's easy enough to just scan the entire subnet looking for the new device, if you don't know its IP address. With IPv6... There are three of four different ways devices can make themselves discoverable, and Windows support for them is a bit limited.

IPv4 works, it's familiar, it's easy. That's why there hasn't been a big migration. There just aren't big benefits for most people, and there are considerable downsides.

Point of order rejected.

High order approximations of logic can absolutely be implemented stochastically. If they couldn't, you'd have to concede that humans can't logic.
Neurons do not fire reliably. At the base, your neural circuitry is fundamentally probabilistic.

The phrase "LLMs are not applying logic to a data set. They are applying statistical probability models to a data set." is as pointless as saying, "The Universe can be modeled with a Markov Chain."

Good- we agree here. We're on the same page, logic wise.

Is it? No. It is not.
Is your implementation of it an approximation? Yes. By any definition you can conjure.

Indefinitely, because it is.
Neurons are fundamentally non-deterministic (at least in the sense that we cannot reasonably predict Brownian motion). Only the group of neurons as a whole provide any semblance of order.
This is how an inherently stochastic system providers a high order approximation of logical inference.

That's the problem. Luls you into a false sense of security, then when you aren't paying attention it fails and you die.

It's easier to capture the emissions of gas electricity plants. Everything else can be electric.

I'm up in the Pacific Northwest.
My cousin lives down in Galveston, TX, and we went to a similar place there years ago.
There and here- they're not super-well known, and for the life of me, I can't figure out why.