Do you need a fucking dictionary?

Ya, that's a fucking problem, I agree.
The system has always been vulnerable to cops lying about why they beat or shot the fucking black guy.
The justice system is slow to start stripping away their presumption of good faith.

Because it's kids doing this, and they want apps for everything.
That's why only a fool would think AI has no future- the shit is crack to everyone I know under the age of 30.

Look at the troll pretending not to be a lost causer!

A perfect example of handling a perceived problem humanely.
You support deportations, so why are you trying to use that as an attack? lol

Erm, so? Are you trying to equate asylum parolees with illegal immigrants? Fascinating. Isn't that like, you motherfuckers whole schtick? You're just against the illegal kind?

Your colors are showing, amigo.

Correct.
Which is fucking widely recognized power of the legislature. What, exactly, about that makes them terrorists?
"We consider this to be a national security concern.".
I warned the dipshits that did foamed at teh fucking mouth for a TikTok ban that this was the can of worms they were opening.
Fucking enjoy.

Note that none of this should be taken to be me condoning this mess.
However, my real beef is with the law that's on the books from 1996. Lot of dark shit happened while Clinton was trying to placate Gingrich.

I said it twice, because they invoked it as if it were a magic spell twice.
In order to say how it differs from MachineShedFred's understanding, he'd have to have explained what that was.
All I can say is that what he thinks certainly doesn't match reality if he thinks that due process is violated by the arrest.

First problem, is that he's mixing up procedural due process, and substantive due process.
Second problem, is that Congress has explicitly limited the due process of people who are here illegally (Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA)) under certain circumstances.
An example of a due process violation that would be unquestionable, would be if they were engaging in indefinite detention (effectively suspending habeas corpus), unless the court found he could legally suspend habeas corpus in this instance (which it almost certainly wouldn't- not even this Supreme Court, I don't think)
i.e., due process claims are largely overblown, and greatly misunderstood.
To be crass, black-bagging an immigrant off the street if you have reason to believe they are eligible for expedited removal is not a violation of their due process rights.
Putting them in prison indefinitely is.

That's a loaded statement.
I'm saying it's not illegal for those reasons, not that they can break the law for those reasons.
Transferring an arrested person from the point of arrest to a detention center with good faith belief that they have been involved in a crime is not unlawful, as long as the finding of good faith is held by the court.
Supremacy clause says that the Constitution and its laws are the supreme law of the land, which means that no law that doesn't explicitly remove qualified immunity (and is found to be constitutionally doing so) can make what they did illegal.

This might sound weird to you- but it makes perfect sense.

It is not reasonable to say that officers, doing their job, under orders assumed to be lawful, are criminals.

#1 is correct, but doesn't apply, making it a pointless claim.
Due process does not mean what you think it means.
#2 is also correct, but does not apply, because of Supremacy, and Qualified Immunity.

You're why we struggle.

Due process does not mean what you think it means.

My eyes are open, and I see the desperation in yours. I wish I could soothe it, but I fear you too stupid to be reasoned with.

No, it most certainly is not.

Uh, also very wrong.

Are you talking about their Office suite, perhaps?

Fail to see how the fuck that's relevant.

Pretty spot on.

I find the TNR much easier to read than the Calibri- but ya, his reversing it over "diversity" concerns is fucking trollish idiocy.

That being said, seeing people talk like Calibri is somehow scientifically proven to be more readable as opposed to just being a political decision itself... I find that bizarre.

That and his body was working on prostate cancer.
I have no ill will toward Joe Biden. Dude is a good American. I'm glad he got to be President. I wish he had been healthy enough to have 2 terms.

These days, I'm frankly content to judge a President simply by their nature. Are they a good guy/gal? Great. I've long since stopped believing that standard economic metrics have shit to do with who is President, and the largest impact they really have is setting the national mood.

Like ICE bullshit- as horrific as it all seems, it's actually pretty fucking tiny in scale. They haven't even arrested 1% of our illegal resident population. But look at the psychological effect it's had on the country. I think we need some Presidents that try to heal that psychological damage. We need more Joe Bidens and Barack Obamas.
If immigration was a problem, there was a humane way to solve it. This edge lord shit psychologically damages us all.

Misleading.
Deportation of someone who does not have a right to be here does not require a trial.
ICE is not secret police. Douche bag police? I'll grant you that.

Which law is this, now?

Because the rational parts of my brain still work, unlike yours.

This might come as news to you, but police in the US have been sticking guns in the faces of lots of people for a very long time.
Do preachers get a pass or some shit?

We're quite a ways away from having an SA or Gestapo, comrade.

And no, that is not the definition of retreat.
Withdrawing to resupply does not indicate defeat. Especially if you come back and continue to dish out the nonconsensual missile-up-your-ass sex.

That would be bad. Commanders would lose their commands, that's for sure.
That also didn't happen.
Ships left to resupply well before they ran out of ammunition.