Comment: Re:It's too bad tablets are pretty much useless. (Score -1) 287
Comment: Re:Why Freemason? (Score 5, Funny) 612
As an open source fanatic, freemasonry has always rubbed me a little the wrong way
Would you like him better if he was an OpenMason?
Comment: Re:Image is poorly Photoshopped - restored version (Score -1) 272
Comment: Re:That's nothing serious (Score -1) 272
Comment: Re:All these studies (Score -1) 102
Comment: Great... (Score 5, Funny) 338
plans to build a toilet that's better suited to developing countries
toilet starter edition...
Comment: Re:The what? (Score -1) 328
Comment: Re:We're all doomed (Score -1) 625
Comment: Re:So, let me see if I got this right ... (Score -1) 625
What if I don't drink coke, I don't use windows, and I don't buy prada? Is that suspicious too?
Commie.
Comment: Will they become... (Score 1) 93
Comment: Re:DVORAK & Emacs Pinky (Score -1) 557
Comment: Re:No. (Score -1) 98
Comment: Re:Reddit made some observations (Score 0) 518
Comment: At least it doesn't affect the whole thing (Score -1) 287
From: Fedora 18's features page
"Note that this feature does not prevent you from using yum and other commandline tools to install updates whenever you want to. We also differentiate updates of 'OS components' (which we want to do in this offline fashion) from application updates and installations, which should still be possible from the UI without restarting the system. The differentiation between 'OS components' and applications is necessarily a heuristic, since Fedora only knows about packages. The initial heuristic is that a package is considered an application if it installs a desktop file that is shown in the menus. This is not perfect and can be refined when additional metadata becomes available. Also note that this feature is about implementing offline updates for GNOME. Other spins are not affected, although they could choose to use the same systemd and PackageKit infrastructure, and provide a similar experience. "
So we will still be able to do "yum update", and packagekit will remain behaving "normally" on the KDE Spin (at least for a while). So if it's just an option for GNOME users, it doesn't seem to be a big deal.
What is scary is the logic behind these changes, which seems to be: "Windows and OSX have nice screens to update and reboot so we must reboot too"