Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: 2030 (Score 1) 74

I used to run analysis using the US road network and the list of charging stations. A year ago, the longest stretch of roads without high-speed chargers was Montana to North Dakota, with 220 miles. The next one was in Oregon, something around 180 miles. More than 99% of the named locations reachable by numbered US highways and freeways were within 100 miles of a fast charger.

So technically, if you did even a bit of planning, you could reach ANY point on the public US roads and still have energy to drive to the next charger with a car having around 350 miles of range. With just 20-30 carefully placed stations, you can cut that down to about 250 miles of range, well within the current capabilities of EVs.

I eyeballed the map, and it looked like around 200 additional fast DC stations would put _any_ reachable location in the lower 48 states within 50 miles of a charger. This is the endgame for the range anxiety. And even at $1m per charger, it would cost less than one day of funding the military. Heck, even at $10m per charger it would still be less!

Comment Re:2030 (Score 4, Interesting) 74

"introduce". This means that actual use is going to they are aiming to work out production snags in 2028 before scaling up in 2029. 2030 is when you should expect these to be generally available.

Duh. BMW and Toyota. They have squandered years of development time. BYD is producing solid-state batteries in small batches for engineering tests, and they're scaling up the production now. They are expecting production rollout around 2027, with gradual scaling over the next several years.

At the same time, CATL is already producing LFPs with 200Wh/kg system density, enough for a 400-mile range on a typical EV ( https://www.catl.com/en/news/6... ). And the sodium-ion cells are at around 140Wh/kg, comparable to Li-Ion batteries in Teslas just 10 years ago with 200Wh/kg cells announced this year!

We might end up not even _needing_ solid-state batteries for most needs. I actually expect them to be used only for devices that need high energy density, like wearables and phones.

Comment Re:but, but, but (Score 1) 103

What do you mean “pushing for”?

Advising customers, providing discounted traffic and instances, defaulting to us-east-2 in the console for new accounts, etc.

Why is Amazon having to convince their users to use what should be automatic redundancy?

It's not the question of redundancy. It's the problem with customers just building everything in us-east-1, so it now dwarfs everything else.

Comment Re:but, but, but (Score 1) 103

For large failures that won't save you. Does Amazon have enough infrastructure to run all of the East instances on their West hardware? That's doubtful and if they tried it would degrade performance if not outright take down the West due to the load.

The replacement for us-east-1 is us-east-2. Amazon has been pushing companies to use it for quite a while. They even have discounted traffic between us-east-1 and us-east-2, it costs exactly the same as traffic within the us-east-1.

Comment Re:Good! (Score 1) 15

It's not disruptive, but it'll help a bit. And yes, pharmacists are important. But do you need them for ALL orders? Even if you're doing a routine refill for a medication that you've been using for years. Or you're picking up an antibiotics prescription. I'm not saying that people should just buy antibiotics without prescription, I'm saying that there's no real need to involve pharmacists in these simple transactions.

Comment Good! (Score 2) 15

Right now I need to go to a pharmacy, drop off my prescription (if it's not electronic), and then wait for somebody to count out pills into a box. And there must be a pharmacist present in case I have questions.

And all of this even if you're buying a pack of antibiotics for an ear infection.

Slashdot Top Deals

The rule on staying alive as a program manager is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once.

Working...