Comment Re:some doubts: (Score 1) 260
Thanks, those are very interesting links with solid information.
Thanks, those are very interesting links with solid information.
There is no right to privacy.
There is no right to your image.
Government can TRY to make those rights, but the freedom of expression is superior to the idea that you can stop me from hand drawing your image when you're at the beach.
According to the article, the hit rate of drones isn't all that amazing, either.
Artillery pretty much works by saturating the area with explosions until some of them hit something. So a low hit rate is expected. Maybe a decade after the war ends we'll get some actual numbers to compare to other theaters.
And yet, Ukraine took out half of Russia's bombers, deep in Russian territory, with drones. They could not have done that with conventional artillery.
That is correct, though it doesn't seem to have affected the course of the war noticeably.
Something like 80% of all causalities in the war right now are coming from drones.
Source?
That's a bold claim.
There are many ways around jamming
The article I linked to speaks about that. Essentially: Yes. But: Not the cheap stuff used, and stuff like fiber optics come with their own drawbacks.
(unsure which "cheaper" weapons you believe exist...drones are dirt cheap)
The article I linked to includes prices.
according to the Wall Street Journal
Meanwhile, some reports from the frontlines indicate that while drones are ubiquituous, they aren't the game-changer the tech-industry wants them to be.
tl;dr essential bits: a) most drone strikes could have been done by other, cheaper weapons. b) drones are an unreliable weapon due to jamming, dependency on weather and light and many technical failures.
I love that the advertisement I'm seeing on this page right now is for a browser extension (from Microsoft)
This is statism, writ large.
You get paid for work you PERFORM, but not work you RECORD. Copyright is anti-individual rights and liberties.
I'll be glad when Ai truly replaces all of these artists.
JSON is an improvement over XML and easier to transmit than YAML.
I guess the fact that this can win a prize just tells me it was good that I never bothered to enter any 'hacking' contests in my entire 35 (+ education) year career.
It's like visual coding or RAD all over again. Whenever suits and PHBs are told there's a magic wand that'll allow them to do without paying people for the nitty-gritty bits, they get all excited and convince each other in their echo chamber that their dream of a company of all managers and no workers is just around the corner.
Then reality says "hi", the hype dies down, a few scam artists got rich and the world continues as it was, with a couple new cool tools in the toolbox of those who know how to use them correctly - which is generally the same people that were supposedly being replaced.
That's how I see AI. I've been writing software for the better part of 40 years. What I see from AI is sometimes astonishing and sometimes pathetic. I would never, ever, ever put AI generated code into production software without carefull checking and refactoring, and I would fire anyone who does.
Code completion is mostly in the "astonishing" part. If I write a couple lines of near-identical stuff, like assigning values from an input to a structured format for processing, the AI most of the time gets right the next line I want to write. Anything more complex than that is hit-and-miss.
Mostly, I use AI the way I would use an intern. "Can you look up how to use this function correctly? What are the parameters and their defaults?" or "Write me some code that's tedious to write (like lots of transformation operations) but not rocket science by far.
Essentially, it does faster and a little bit better what previously I'd have done with Google and Stackoverflow.
I have no fear it'll replace developers anytime soon. Half of the time the code is outright wrong, most of the time it has glaring security issues or isn't half as fault-tolerant as it should be, and for any case where I know how to do it without any research, I'd be faster writing the code myself then going through several iterations with an AI to get it done.
I'm having flashbacks to that sequence in Real Genius (the 1980s movie with Val Kilmer) where over time, tape recorders have replaced not only all the students in a lecture hall (except for Mitch), but also the professor.
Oh come on.
We've been saying "Thanks, Biden!" for years as a joke, and you blue haired legbeards always got riled up with your "source????" and "citation needed???" cries.
(FWIW I don't support Trump and have never voted Republican).
Diminished maybe, but not all that much.
I think we can reasonably assume that if there's a huge blackout, it won't last forever. A lot of smart people will work hard on getting things up and running again. A few years ago in the USA it lasted for a bit longer, what was it, a week or two? Recently in Spain it lasted a few days. But all those power stations and power grid operators don't just shrug and go home. So getting through those days is probably all it takes for any reasonably realistic scenario.
And you can build things up piecewise. I've got my solar now. The next thing will be a battery. Once I have that, I can think about an electric car.
The person who's taking you to lunch has no intention of paying.