Canâ(TM)t Apple restart the CSAM service and be compliant?

... but his tweeting is just inane.

So Musk 2020 then ;)

https://threadreaderapp.com/th...

Existential threat(s) - what can they not enable/achieve ?!

Bruce Schneier (circa 2015): As we look back at the post-industrial age and wonder "How could they have been oblivious to the pollution of the industrial age", 20 years from now, people will look back at present day and wonder "How could they have let so much information pollution with absolute disregard".

Challenge accepted

Big Tech has redefined privacy to mean who they share the datat they collected. It should be what they are collecting and an explicit consent to be required for doing so.

If the data was analyzed and any "metadata" saved forever, deleting the data is effectively irrelevant.

Apple should have pulled Facebook's development certificates for Facebook as a whole

I think that's exactly what has happened, as evidenced by Apple's statement : Any developer using their enterprise certificates to distribute apps to consumers will have their certificates revoked, which is what we did in this case to protect our users and their data."

Now, you can create an Animoji for that ;)

Citation ? I thought when Messages determines the recipient is not an iPhone, it uses the SMS functionality of the carrier - not any iMessage-SMS gateway.

I'm sure a whole lot of folks have been waiting to get into the 2/5000 mile high club !

That would be anybody who votes for a republican or democrat. A little over 98% according to the last numbers. And they are digging in their heels when challenged over it.

Hurray, I am a 2 percenter !

Not by a Government nor by a company.

Which is effectively the same today, due to third-party doctrine ...

Perhaps people won't complain about privacy if the utility provider is the entity that builds and uses the data monitoring system, instead of a third party entity ?